Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>> I tried gocr and the result was quite miserable. Then I tried with MS
>> Windows
>> and it was almost perfect. Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software
>> under
>> Linux is very poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> I tried gocr and the result was quite miserable. Then I tried with MS Windows
> and it was almost perfect. Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software
> under
> Linux is very poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for
> that: unfortunately my test see
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 07:54:40PM -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
> On 7/21/07, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nelson Castillo([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>> > On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer
If you install as stated above with aptitude, tesseract-ocr-data is
automatically installed unless you change default behavior of aptitude.
FTBFS is just package issue. This package should work. Otherwise,
please file bug report.
Osamu, thanks a lot. The package works well.
Sorry -- if I was
On 7/21/07, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nelson Castillo([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Nelson Castillo([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >> Why not use the Debian package? It is called "t
On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Why not use the Debian package? It is called "tesseract-ocr".
Yes. But it is old 1.02 version and has FTBFS bug.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Why not use the Debian package? It is called "tesseract-ocr".
Yes. But it is old 1.02 version and has FTBFS bug.
If anyone here is interesed to help maintain update w
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 22:25:43 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
[...]
> I installed tesseract with configure, make, make install, then tried to run it
> but got the following error message:
>
> Unable to load unicharset file /usr/local/share/tessdata/eng.unicharset
>
> . In the README file ther
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> I tried gocr and the result was quite miserable. Then I tried with MS Windows
> and it was almost perfect. Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software
> under
> Linux is very poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for
> that: unfortunately my test see
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 08:10:27PM +0200, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> > Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software under Linux is very
> > poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for that:
> > unfortunately my test seems to confirm that. What do you Debian
> >
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Somewhere in the web I read that OCR software under Linux is very
> poor at the moment and that it's better to use MS Windows for that:
> unfortunately my test seems to confirm that. What do you Debian
> listers think?
I think you should check out these articles.
http:/
Rodolfo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Excuse the basic question:
>> > I wish to scan a printed text so to have it in an editable text file.
>> > How can I do that with `sane' and `scanimage'?
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:57:03AM -0400, Celejar wrote:
>> Scanners scan to image formats.
13 matches
Mail list logo
