Re: Nspluginwrapper small problem

2009-01-14 Thread mathengejr
hu, 15 Jan 2009 10:59 am Subject: Re: Nspluginwrapper small problem Still wunt come round it. I tried replacing firefox with iceweasel for the second option but it wunt work still. Uname -all gives Linux debian 2.6.18-6-686 #1 SMP i686 if it makes a difference. -Original Message- From: Kum

Re: Nspluginwrapper small problem

2009-01-14 Thread mathengejr
am Subject: Re: Nspluginwrapper small problem On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM, wrote: I have yesterday just installed Etch(read not confident enough to go into Lenny) i386 netinstall on my laptop and the first thing I thought I would do is make flashplayer 10 work but it is actually my only

Re: Nspluginwrapper small problem

2009-01-14 Thread André Neves
I also think that the Original Poster won't need nspluginwrapper, but for the record I'll just tell my tale here. > I think nspluginwrapper is useful is you need to get the x86 Flash > plugin working on an amd64 machine. i386 installations should not need > nspluginwrapper. I run amd64, and the v

Re: Nspluginwrapper small problem

2009-01-14 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM, wrote: > I have yesterday just installed Etch(read not confident enough to go into > Lenny) i386 netinstall on my laptop and the first thing I thought I would do > is make flashplayer 10 work but it is actually my only remaining problem > second to wireless. What

Nspluginwrapper small problem

2009-01-14 Thread mathengejr
I have yesterday just installed Etch(read not confident enough to go into Lenny) i386 netinstall on my laptop and the first thing I thought I would do is make flashplayer 10 work but it is actually my only remaining problem second to wireless. What is the exact target file to place the .so plugi