Re: Non US, PGP and slink

1999-01-07 Thread Georg Bauer
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >deb http://www.rising.com.au/debian-non-US dists/unstable/non-US/binary-$(ARCH)/ I'll try it next time I have to do an update. Thanks. bye, Georg -- http://www.westfalen.de/hugo/

Re: Non US, PGP and slink

1999-01-06 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 01:32:41PM +, Georg Bauer wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randy Edwards > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I get the same thing about several non-existent files in non-us/slink. > >This was discussed a week or two ago and I had hoped that it'd soon be > >cl

Re: Non US, PGP and slink

1999-01-04 Thread Georg Bauer
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randy Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get the same thing about several non-existent files in non-us/slink. >This was discussed a week or two ago and I had hoped that it'd soon be cleared >up, but it hasn't been. I currently think that non-us.debian.org is

Re: Non US, PGP and slink

1999-01-02 Thread Randy Edwards
> Has anyone else had problems with the non US debian slink sites? The > Packages file seems to contain pgp-us version 2.6.3a-5, but, for at > least a month now, the pgp-us package itself is version 2.6.3a-4. I get the same thing about several non-existent files in non-us/slink. This was discu

Non US, PGP and slink

1999-01-02 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
Has anyone else had problems with the non US debian slink sites? The Packages file seems to contain pgp-us version 2.6.3a-5, but, for at least a month now, the pgp-us package itself is version 2.6.3a-4. This has caused me no end of problems with "apt-get upgrade", at least until I removed the nonus