On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:10:05 Camaleón wrote:
> Sorry, Lisi but on a mailing list there are some rules you should try to
> follow, and I don't want to sound rude but you insisted too much in
> remarking something I was not talking about, dunno why.
Camaleón - this is absurd. You do soun
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:34:23 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011 schrieb Camaleón:
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:50:05 +0100, Lisi wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 27 September 2011 12:53:34 Camaleón wrote:
>> >> Then, you have to start reading the "whole thing" (aka, the whole
>>
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011 schrieb Camaleón:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:50:05 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 September 2011 12:53:34 Camaleón wrote:
> >> Then, you have to start reading the "whole thing" (aka, the whole
> >> thread) before making such statements on what you find "qualified
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:50:05 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 September 2011 12:53:34 Camaleón wrote:
>> Then, you have to start reading the "whole thing" (aka, the whole
>> thread) before making such statements on what you find "qualified" or
>> not because something can look unqualified only t
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 12:53:34 Camaleón wrote:
> Then, you have to start reading the "whole thing" (aka, the whole thread)
> before making such statements on what you find "qualified" or not because
> something can look unqualified only to unqualified eyes, so please, I
> understand that som
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:06:06 +0100, Lisi wrote:
Gee... still with this? :-)
> On Monday 26 September 2011 19:07:17 Camaleón wrote:
>> Yes, you should have read the full thread
>
> I'm not the only one who has been known to transgress in that manner.
> And I'm sure that I won't be the last. Don
On Monday 26 September 2011 19:07:17 Camaleón wrote:
> Yes, you should have read the full thread
I'm not the only one who has been known to transgress in that manner. And I'm
sure that I won't be the last. Don't you think that this all getting a bit
OTT for what was, after all, not that seriou
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:47:45 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 25 September 2011 18:29:10 Camaleón wrote:
>> It seems to me that you replied to more than that statement as we were
>> not talking about external hard disks at all.
>
> I _was_ replying solely to the statement.
And you expanded with
On Sunday 25 September 2011 18:29:10 Camaleón wrote:
> It seems to me that you replied to more than that statement as we were
> not talking about external hard disks at all.
I _was_ replying solely to the statement. I did not read thro' the thread and
make sure of the context, and you can and do
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:48:16 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> On 09/25/11 06:36, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:34:12 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>>
>> No new modern hard disk will come partitioned, they come low-level
>> formatted from factory :-)
>
> That shows how long it's been since I
On 09/25/11 06:36, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:34:12 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
No new modern hard disk will come partitioned, they come low-level
formatted from factory :-)
That shows how long it's been since I installed a new drive. The last
time that I did so, it was the curren
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:30:24 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 25 September 2011 17:25:16 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:11:38 +, Curt wrote:
>> > On 2011-09-25, Camaleón wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:24:30 +0100, Lisi wrote:
>> >>> On Sunday 25 September 2011 14:36:57 Camaleón
On Sunday 25 September 2011 17:25:16 Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:11:38 +, Curt wrote:
> > On 2011-09-25, Camaleón wrote:
> >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:24:30 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 25 September 2011 14:36:57 Camaleón wrote:
> No new modern hard disk will come partiti
On Sunday 25 September 2011 16:49:35 Camaleón wrote:
> I never buy those pre-boxed disks... I prefer to get an external USB/
> Firewire case and put an internal disk on it, they're far better and
> easily to upgrade than the others ;-)
After this battle, I think that I shall remember that! Thanks
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:11:38 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2011-09-25, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:24:30 +0100, Lisi wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday 25 September 2011 14:36:57 Camaleón wrote:
No new modern hard disk will come partitioned, they come low-level
formatted from factory :-)
>
On 2011-09-25, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:24:30 +0100, Lisi wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 25 September 2011 14:36:57 Camaleón wrote:
>>> No new modern hard disk will come partitioned, they come low-level
>>> formatted from factory :-)
>>
>> Unless it's external.
>
> Barracuda disks are no
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:24:30 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 25 September 2011 14:36:57 Camaleón wrote:
>> No new modern hard disk will come partitioned, they come low-level
>> formatted from factory :-)
>
> Unless it's external.
Barracuda disks are not usually external. Seagate uses fancy name
On Sunday 25 September 2011 14:36:57 Camaleón wrote:
> No new modern hard disk will come partitioned, they come low-level
> formatted from factory :-)
Unless it's external. Then it will be clogged up with Windows stuff that it
will relinquish only very, very reluctantly. I still haven't got my
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:34:12 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> On 09/24/11 20:48, Marc Shapiro wrote:
(...)
>> Do I need to make changes in the BIOS to recognize SATA drives?
>
> Obviously, I needed to answer my own question. Yes! I did need to
> activate SATA in the BIOS.
(...)
It's not very
On 09/24/11 20:48, Marc Shapiro wrote:
I'm feeling really dumb right now. Okay, I'm not dumb, I'm just lacking
the information that I need at this time.
I just installed a new SATA 1TB Seagate Barracuda drive in my Lenny box
with FVWM as my window manager. This is the first time that I have
inst
20 matches
Mail list logo
