[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:56:15 -0600
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 192.168.1.1 <--
network 192.168.1.0
netmask 255.255.255.252
broadcast 192.168.1.3
auto eth2
iface eth2 inet static
addre
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:40:39 -0600
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case, I believe a primary purpose of this list is to teach, not
> just solve problems. If I can make someone _think_ I've been more
> successful than if I fixed whatever was broke. Oh and BTW, the OP
> respond
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 07:59:21PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:56:15 -0600
> Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > auto eth1
> > iface eth1 inet static
> > address 192.168.1.1 <--
> > network 192.168.1.0
> > netmask 255.255.255.
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 13:56:15 -0600
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
> address 192.168.1.1 <--
> network 192.168.1.0
> netmask 255.255.255.252
> broadcast 192.168.1.3
>
> auto eth2
> iface eth2 inet static
> a
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 01:23:09PM -0600, Eric Eelkema wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 486 with three 3c509 cards set up as a router. It
> took some work to get the cards on different IRQs, but I
> think I did that correctly, and all of them work individually.
> The problem is, when I bring up both int
Hi,
I have a 486 with three 3c509 cards set up as a router. It
took some work to get the cards on different IRQs, but I
think I did that correctly, and all of them work individually.
The problem is, when I bring up both interfaces to the internal
network, the one I bring up first works, but the o
6 matches
Mail list logo