On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 05:52:05PM +, Mihira Fernando wrote:
> On Fri December 28 2007, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > AFAIR the mail would show up in Inbox, but I couldn't download it. Maybe
> > things changed?
> This is what I meant too. It is in the inbox in gmail's web interface.
>
> > What mai
On Fri December 28 2007, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> AFAIR the mail would show up in Inbox, but I couldn't download it. Maybe
> things changed?
This is what I meant too. It is in the inbox in gmail's web interface.
> What mailing list are you talking about? All debian lists send a copy of
> your e-mai
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:27:13AM +, Mihira Fernando wrote:
> Have to disagree there. If you send a test mail to yourself using a gmail
> account, it WILL come to your gmail inbox.
AFAIR the mail would show up in Inbox, but I couldn't download it. Maybe
things changed?
> The reason why
On Mon December 17 2007 2:40 am, hce wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2007 7:04 PM, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > If you are trying to retrieve your own test mail from gmail that won't
> > work due to a strange idea of gmail: there should only be one copy of an
> > email. Because this is
On Dec 16, 2007 7:04 PM, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:08:46AM +1100, hce wrote:
>
> > Sorry for faulse alarm, it is actually working. I sent a test mail
> > from my mutt client, the mail was received, but not delivered by the
> > pop server. Some how, the
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:08:46AM +1100, hce wrote:
> Sorry for faulse alarm, it is actually working. I sent a test mail
> from my mutt client, the mail was received, but not delivered by the
> pop server. Some how, the fetchmail stopped workijng. That is another
> issue I'll have to fix it mys
On 12/16/07, hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/15/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 07:49:20PM +1100, hce wrote:
> >
> > > > Aha, the old "no worthy mechs" error. What libsasl packages do you have
> > > > installed? Please post the output of
> > > >
> >
On 12/15/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 07:49:20PM +1100, hce wrote:
>
> > > Aha, the old "no worthy mechs" error. What libsasl packages do you have
> > > installed? Please post the output of
> > >
> > > dpkg -l libsasl*
> >
> >
> > $ dpkg -l libsasl*
> > De
On Sat December 15 2007 8:49 am, hce wrote:
> $ dpkg -l libsasl*
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
>
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
> | uppercase=bad)
> |
> ||/ Name V
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 07:49:20PM +1100, hce wrote:
> > Aha, the old "no worthy mechs" error. What libsasl packages do you have
> > installed? Please post the output of
> >
> > dpkg -l libsasl*
>
>
> $ dpkg -l libsasl*
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-
On 12/15/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 11:08:19AM +1100, hce wrote:
>
> > > You're the client here not the server. For gmail as relayhost I have
> > > this setup:
> >
> > Does that mean I don't need to worry about ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem and
> > ssl-cert-snak
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 11:08:19AM +1100, hce wrote:
> > You're the client here not the server. For gmail as relayhost I have
> > this setup:
>
> Does that mean I don't need to worry about ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem and
> ssl-cert-snakeoil.key, were they created by server?
I never cared about those a
On 12/15/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:54:17PM +1100, hce wrote:
>
> > Could it be the problem of ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem and
> > ssl-cert-snakeoil.key? Should I manually to create them by openssl
> > (and how?)?
> >
> > smtpd_tls_cert_file=/etc/ssl/certs/
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:54:17PM +1100, hce wrote:
> Could it be the problem of ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem and
> ssl-cert-snakeoil.key? Should I manually to create them by openssl
> (and how?)?
>
> smtpd_tls_cert_file=/etc/ssl/certs/ssl-cert-snakeoil.pem
> smtpd_tls_key_file=/etc/ssl/private/ssl-ce
On 12/14/07, Mihira Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu December 13 2007 9:16 pm, hce wrote:
> > $ sudo apt-get install sasl
> > E: Couldn't find package sasl
> >
> > What is the SASL package name?
> > Thank you.
> > Kind Regards,
> > Jim
>
> $apt-cache search libsasl
E: Couldn't find pac
On Thu December 13 2007 9:16 pm, hce wrote:
> $ sudo apt-get install sasl
> E: Couldn't find package sasl
>
> What is the SASL package name?
> Thank you.
> Kind Regards,
> Jim
$apt-cache search libsasl
I believe the package is libsasl2
Mihira.
PS. Please send replies to list only.
--
Random Q
On 12/14/07, Mihira Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu December 13 2007 10:58 am, hce wrote:
>
> > I did exactly as per above, but it still cannot post as the same
> > following ssl errors, is there something missing?
> >
> > Dec 13 21:43:53 debian postfix/smtp[4100]: certificate verifica
On Thu December 13 2007 10:58 am, hce wrote:
> I did exactly as per above, but it still cannot post as the same
> following ssl errors, is there something missing?
>
> Dec 13 21:43:53 debian postfix/smtp[4100]: certificate verification
> failed for smtp.gmail.com: num=20:unable to get local issuer
On 12/13/07, Mihira Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed December 12 2007 10:58 am, hce wrote:
> > Almost, but it has following error for certificates, it seems that was
> > a ssl proglem, but I don't know how to fix it:
> >
> > Dec 12 21:50:42 debian postfix/master[2740]: reload configurat
On Wed December 12 2007 10:58 am, hce wrote:
> Almost, but it has following error for certificates, it seems that was
> a ssl proglem, but I don't know how to fix it:
>
> Dec 12 21:50:42 debian postfix/master[2740]: reload configuration
> /etc/postfix Dec 12 21:50:42 debian postfix/qmgr[4881]: B7BF
On 12/12/07, Mihira Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hce wrote:
> >
> > $ /usr/sbin/postconf -n
> > alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
> > alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
> > append_dot_mydomain = yes
> > biff = no
> > canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
> > config_directory = /etc/pos
hce wrote:
$ /usr/sbin/postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = yes
biff = no
canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
config_directory = /etc/postfix
inet_interfaces = loopback-only
inet_protocols = ipv4
mailbox_size_limit = 512
On 12/10/07, Mihira Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hce wrote:
>
> >
> > Indeed, my ISP blocks port 25. How can I config the postfix to change
> > to use 465 or 587? I have following sasl_passwd:
> >
> > smtp.gmail.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> > Jim
>
[back on list]
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:40:09 +1100
hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 7:35 AM, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > > The port 25 return error immediately, is it port 25 problem?
> > >
> > > Seems it is a network connection problem, isn't it?
> >
> > Many I
hce wrote:
Indeed, my ISP blocks port 25. How can I config the postfix to change
to use 465 or 587? I have following sasl_passwd:
smtp.gmail.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Jim
It would help if you can post results of postconf -n
and show the relevant map files (with the
On Dec 10, 2007 7:35 AM, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:46:47 +1100
> hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 12/9/07, John Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > hce wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am using mutt in Debian, it was workng fine in both receive and
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 16:46:47 +1100
hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/9/07, John Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hce wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am using mutt in Debian, it was workng fine in both receive and send
> > > emails (gmail server), but it is now only working receive email, d
On 12/9/07, John Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hce wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using mutt in Debian, it was workng fine in both receive and send
> > emails (gmail server), but it is now only working receive email, does
> > not work to send email since last week, please see following error
> >
On 12/9/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/08/07 21:35, hce wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using mutt in Debian, it was workng fine in both receive and send
> > emails (gmail server), but it is now only working receive email, does
> >
hce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using mutt in Debian, it was workng fine in both receive and send
> emails (gmail server), but it is now only working receive email, does
> not work to send email since last week, please see following error
> message. Any suggestion what I could do wrong?
>
> Dec 9 14:13:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/07 21:35, hce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using mutt in Debian, it was workng fine in both receive and send
> emails (gmail server), but it is now only working receive email, does
> not work to send email since last week, please see following error
Hi,
I am using mutt in Debian, it was workng fine in both receive and send
emails (gmail server), but it is now only working receive email, does
not work to send email since last week, please see following error
message. Any suggestion what I could do wrong?
Dec 9 14:13:48 debian postfix/smtp[13
32 matches
Mail list logo
