Ogya Chief wrote:
> On the linux box, if I try to ping the Win2K laptop, I get the following:
>
> PING laptop.network.home (192.168.0.5): 56 data bytes
> ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
> ping: wrote laptop.network.home 64 chars, ret=-1
>
> On the Win2K machine, the following is what I get
From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I doubt it; have you tried pinging by address instead of by name?
This "feels" like a problem with Windows; do you have a firewall on the W2K
laptop? It might be blocking ping traffic.
I'd pop a Knoppix CD into the W2K box and see if it works correctly on the
Ogya Chief wrote:
From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So your Win2K laptop gets the 0.5 address when connected to your home
LAN?
And your Linux server has the address of 0.1?
Correct
Can you ping localhost? Do you have other machines on the network you
can ping? What's the result of "ifconfig"?
From: Nayyar Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Nayyar Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
what seems to me ,is that you have duplicate ip's on both
linux and win2k machine . as you say "also I have the same entries in
the host file on win2k" if my guess is wrong please supply full detail
of your linux and
From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network setup problems
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:47:45 -0500
So your Win2K laptop gets the 0.5 address when connected to your home LAN?
And your Linux server has the address of 0.1?
Correct
Can you ping localhost? Do yo
Ogya Chief wrote:
I have a Win2K laptop with a full computer name like henry.workdomain.com
and a domain name like workdomain.com. This gets assigned an automatic ip
address anytime I log onto the work network.
I have a small linux network at home and I wanted to setup samba to be
able to use the l
Hi All,
I have a Win2K laptop with a full computer name like henry.workdomain.com
and a domain name like workdomain.com. This gets assigned an automatic ip
address anytime I log onto the work network.
I have a small linux network at home and I wanted to setup samba to be
able to use the laptop at h
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 06:34:01 +0200, Ogya Chief <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a Win2K laptop with a full computer name like henry.workdomain.com
> and a domain name like workdomain.com. This gets assigned an automatic ip
> address anytime I log onto the work network.
>
> I have a
Hi All,
I have a Win2K laptop with a full computer name like henry.workdomain.com
and a domain name like workdomain.com. This gets assigned an automatic ip
address anytime I log onto the work network.
I have a small linux network at home and I wanted to setup samba to be
able to use the laptop at h
Thanks Pigeon,
I think it will be the trial and error method for ethernet irq over next
couple of days. But since I'm not used to running modprobe I want to do
a little reading before I start experimenting with this.
Ken
Pigeon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:40:06AM -0500, Ken Januski wrot
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:40:06AM -0500, Ken Januski wrote:
> Pigeon,
>
> Thanks again for all your work on this. I'm still not successful but
> will keep investigating it later today when I get back from work. As
> noted below all attempts to change irq of modem with setserial ended up
> wit
Pigeon,
Thanks again for all your work on this. I'm still not successful but
will keep investigating it later today when I get back from work. As
noted below all attempts to change irq of modem with setserial ended up
with a hung pc. I want to research modprobe a bit before trying it.
The onl
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 04:29:22PM -0500, Ken Januski wrote:
>
> Pigeon,
>
> Thanks for your input. My answers are below:
>
> >>
> >>I've been experimenting wth changing settings in serial.conf but have
> >>had no luck. Though dmesg says that a modem is found at ttys00 with an
> >>irq of 4 set
Added note: I was able to find the key (F2) to get to the bios and
couldn't find anything there on modem , ethernet card or interrupts. The
only thing that seemed close was the option to set Serial to Auto. I
left that as it was.
Ken
Ken Januski wrote:
Pigeon,
Thanks for your input. My answ
Pigeon,
Thanks for your input. My answers are below:
I've been experimenting wth changing settings in serial.conf but have
had no luck. Though dmesg says that a modem is found at ttys00 with an
irq of 4 setting that in serial.conf results in a hanging modem. I keep
having to set it to ttys0 wi
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:48:55AM -0500, Ken Januski wrote:
> Pigeon wrote:
> >Your /proc/interrupts output shows irq 3 being allocated to "serial",
> >which is probably the serial port being used for your modem, which
> >probably explains why ppp is involved in the conflict.
> >
> >Rather than tr
Thanks Pigeon,
I've been experimenting wth changing settings in serial.conf but have
had no luck. Though dmesg says that a modem is found at ttys00 with an
irq of 4 setting that in serial.conf results in a hanging modem. I keep
having to set it to ttys0 with irq of 3. I'm really unclear about h
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:02:02PM -0800, Kevin Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:00:19PM -0500, Ken Januski wrote:
> >
> > I still have the problem of not being able to use pon and ethernet and
> > same time but at least I'm headed back in the right direction.
>
> >From your earlier du
After doing a little research on Google it does look like interrupts
with that nic aren't unheard of. So I'll see what I can find out about
resolving irq conflicts. But I don't expect any quick answers on my own
so if anyone has any ideas on how to change the irq I'd appreciate it.
Ken
Kevin B
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:00:19PM -0500, Ken Januski wrote:
>
> I still have the problem of not being able to use pon and ethernet and
> same time but at least I'm headed back in the right direction.
>From your earlier dumps, it does look indeed like the ethernet
card is fighting over irq 3 and
Ken Januski declaimed:
> I still have the problem of not being able to use pon and ethernet and
> same time but at least I'm headed back in the right direction.
>
> I continue to get "Can't get terminal parameters: input/output error"
> when trying to run pon with ethernet up.
Disclaimer: I don'
No, it couldn't be so simple. BUT IT IS!! Sure enough I forgot that I'd
turned on the XP firewall. Once I turned it off I was able to ping the
XP machine. Thanks for pointing that out!
I still have the problem of not being able to use pon and ethernet and
same time but at least I'm headed back
Thanks Stephen,
Here's the output of most of what you asked for.
lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82815 815 Chipset Host Bridge and
Memory Controller Hub (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: I
Ken Januski wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting this thread over from one that used to be called "Can
anyone give me a clue..." . Sorry for anyone that was trying to help me
with that thread. I'm thankful for your help but feel I need to rephrase
the problem.
First of all I have a crossover cable connec
Ken Januski wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting this thread over from one that used to be called "Can
anyone give me a clue..." . Sorry for anyone that was trying to help
me with that thread. I'm thankful for your help but feel I need to
rephrase the problem.
First of all I have a crossover cable connect
Hi,
I'm starting this thread over from one that used to be called "Can
anyone give me a clue..." . Sorry for anyone that was trying to help me
with that thread. I'm thankful for your help but feel I need to rephrase
the problem.
First of all I have a crossover cable connecting my Debian machin
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, John Stevenson wrote:
> Here is the info you asked for:
>
> Our office network is fairly simplistic, basically we use the
> ISDN modem as a router / gateway to the internet. It has an
> internal IP address of 172.16.1.1 which I set on my laptop to be
> the address of the gate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> John Stevenson writes:
> > I am running Apache as a web server and everything runs fine
> > when I am attached to my home LAN, using my own machine as the
> > gateway.
>
> Why do you need a gateway at all for your home LAN?
I have absoultely no idea, but it works...
"Stephen A. Witt" wrote:
> I've been looking at the info you provided and I don't think there is
> enough to troubleshoot your problem. What are the IP addresses/netmasks
> of your machine(s)? How is your network connected together (number of
> ethernet segments, IP address/netmask assigned to
John Stevenson writes:
> I am running Apache as a web server and everything runs fine
> when I am attached to my home LAN, using my own machine as the
> gateway.
Why do you need a gateway at all for your home LAN?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, John Stevenson wrote:
>
> Do I need to add a route to my web server, or change my configs
> to represent it?
> Do I need to have DNS services running??
>
> Can anyone help me ??
I've been looking at the info you provided and I don't think there is
enough to troubleshoot your
Hello,
I have a strange problem I cant seen to understand what to do
about it.
I am running Apache as a web server and everything runs fine
when I am attached to my home LAN, using my own machine as the
gateway.
However, when I connect to the office to use the internet I have
to assign our ISDN
Hello,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I am having some problems getting my lan working. I'm trying to
> > connect my win95 machine to my linux machine. Both have 3c509's
> > connected to a hub. I've given my linux box 192.168.1.1 and windows
> > 192.168.1.2. However, I can not ping either
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am having some problems getting my lan working. I'm trying to
> connect my win95 machine to my linux machine. Both have 3c509's
> connected to a hub. I've given my linux box 192.168.1.1 and windows
> 192.168.1.2. However, I can not ping either machine from the
Hi there !
Sorry to come in late on this ...
Have you set you /etc/hosts file correctly ?
127.0.0.1 localhost
192.168.1.1 linux.networkname linux
192.168.1.2 windows.networkname windows
Also in W95 have you configured your network setup ?
Make sure TCP/IP networking is
Subject: Network Setup Problems
Date: Sun, Dec 06, 1998 at 09:45:38PM -0500
In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I am having some problems getting my lan working. I'm trying to
> connect my win95 machine to my linux
On Sun, 6 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having some problems getting my lan working. I'm trying to
> connect my win95 machine to my linux machine. Both have 3c509's
> connected to a hub. I've given my linux box 192.168.1.1 and windows
> 192.168.1.2. However, I can not ping either ma
Hey Chris:
>I am having some problems getting my lan working. I'm trying to
>connect my win95 machine to my linux machine. Both have 3c509's
>connected to a hub. I've given my linux box 192.168.1.1 and windows
>192.168.1.2. However, I can not ping either machine from the other.
>Any ideas?
J
I am having some problems getting my lan working. I'm trying to
connect my win95 machine to my linux machine. Both have 3c509's
connected to a hub. I've given my linux box 192.168.1.1 and windows
192.168.1.2. However, I can not ping either machine from the other.
Any ideas?
BTW, here is a bas
39 matches
Mail list logo
