On Sunday 18 January 2009 18:37:38 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> > >> "Unfortunately Sun then developed the CDDL[1] and Jörg Schilling
> > >> released parts of recent versions of cdrtools under this license."
> > >>
> > >> True.
> > >
> > >Given the fact that attacking
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> >> "Unfortunately Sun then developed the CDDL[1] and Jörg Schilling
> >> released parts of recent versions of cdrtools under this license."
> >>
> >> True.
> >Given the fact that attacking Sun (the largest donator of OpenSOurce
> > software) is definitely FUD, w
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: winfr...@tilanus.com
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: k3b & brasero don't work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X
>Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:28:50 +0100
>
>>On 01/18/2009 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On 01/18/2009 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Hi,
> Can anyone that cares (or, perhaps, is
> schooled in formal logic and needs some exercise) back me up on that
> assertion?
Maybe it is time to stop discussing and look at this discussion from a
distance.
Jörg didn't produce solid evidence for
On Sunday 18 January 2009, Joerg Schilling
wrote about 'Re: k3b & brasero don't
work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X':
>"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
>> On Saturday 17 January 2009, Joerg Schilling
>> wrote about 'Re: k3b & brasero
>
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> On Saturday 17 January 2009, Joerg Schilling
> wrote about 'Re: k3b & brasero don't
> work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X':
> >Chris Bannister wrote:
> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/198171/
> >
> >
On Saturday 17 January 2009, Joerg Schilling
wrote about 'Re: k3b & brasero don't
work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X':
>Chris Bannister wrote:
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/198171/
>
>Everything starting with the word "Unfortunately" in this article is
Chris Bannister wrote:
> Maybe Jörg could comment on the below article:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/198171/
Let me answer as quick as your question was:
Everything starting with the word "Unfortunately" in this article is plain FUD.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jör
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 04:31:47PM +0100, Winfried Tilanus wrote:
> On 01/16/2009 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>
> > Debian however is definitively in conflict with the Copyright law
>
> Jörg, this is a severe accusation. If it is true, then it calls for
> immediate action. So I ask you once aga
On Sat,10.Jan.09, 12:30:07, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Still, I have no doubt reportbug could be improved.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/reportbug-ng
Careful, several Debian Developers have complained about it, including
the Release Team:
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/
On Friday 2009 January 16 09:57:53 Jochen Schulz wrote:
>Joerg Schilling:
>> You as a user are not going to run into problems as the Copyright law
>> allows to run software independent from whether it has been published
>> illegally. Debian however is definitively in conflict with the Copyright
>>
Joerg Schilling:
> Jochen Schulz wrote:
>
>> Jörg, is there anything we can do to make you recognize the fact that
>> there are different opinions on that subject and that there is no sense
>> in trying to educate anyone on this list? You are doing yourself and
>> this list a disservice by repeat
On 01/16/2009 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Debian however is definitively in conflict with the Copyright law
Jörg, this is a severe accusation. If it is true, then it calls for
immediate action. So I ask you once again: please give us all juridical
details, so we can judge the validity of this a
Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Joerg Schilling:
> >
> > As mentioned before: cdrkit is neither free nor working.
>
> Jörg, is there anything we can do to make you recognize the fact that
> there are different opinions on that subject and that there is no sense
> in trying to educate anyone on this list?
Joerg Schilling:
>
> As mentioned before: cdrkit is neither free nor working.
Jörg, is there anything we can do to make you recognize the fact that
there are different opinions on that subject and that there is no sense
in trying to educate anyone on this list? You are doing yourself and
this lis
On Thursday 2009 January 15 09:10:21 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> >So you are happy if someone givey you pre-alpha's and calls them
>> > "stable"? This sounds really strange.
>>
>> My first requirement is that the release team does not feel t
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> >So you are happy if someone givey you pre-alpha's and calls them "stable"?
> >This sounds really strange.
>
> My first requirement is that the release team does not feel the need to use
> the qualifier "alpha". I did not say that was my only condition. Please
On Monday 2009 January 12 09:41:45 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
>> >The minimum requirements one need to have on a "stable release" is that
>> > it does not have known bugs at the time of piublishing.
>>
>> We have different requirements for a stable release.
>>
>> >Cdre
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> >The minimum requirements one need to have on a "stable release" is that it
> >does not have known bugs at the time of piublishing.
>
> We have different requirements for a stable release.
>
> >Cdrecord had 50 stable releases that match the requirements within th
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. schrieb:
If Paul makes a bug report, this will just add another bug to the long list
of bugs in cdrkit but it will not result in a bugfix.
Since previous bugs files have resulted in a bugfix, I choose not to believe
your predictions of the future.
Given the bug stati
On Sunday 2009 January 11 08:17:19 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>Then please follow the Nettiquette rules and send Cc:'s!
The rules for this mailing list are available from the URL I posted. Please
follow them and do not CC me on posts to the list. If you would like to be
CC'd on posts to the list,
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> On Friday 2009 January 09 09:25:31 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >There recently have been some mails from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. and
> >Johannes Wiedersich that have not been send to me, so it seems that the
> >authors are not interested in a discussion.
>
> Actually
On Sat January 10 2009, Celejar wrote:
> > yes, that is my bug report. When I type "reportbug" it started the
> > process. I'm not sure how it picked that namd/email combo, unless I
> > signed up for reportbug with it long ago I use my yahoo account for
> > some online STUFF where I don't want
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:37:23 -0500
Paul Cartwright wrote:
...
> yes, that is my bug report. When I type "reportbug" it started the process.
> I'm not sure how it picked that namd/email combo, unless I signed up for
> reportbug with it long ago I use my yahoo account for some online STUFF
On Sat January 10 2009, Bob Cox wrote:
> Hi Paul - I have just been looking at this bug report of yours, which I
> assume is the one at
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511369
yes, that is my bug report. When I type "reportbug" it started the process.
I'm not sure how it picked
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:59:52PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Friday 2009 January 09 21:15:31 Paul Cartwright wrote:
> >On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >> I usually search/browse b.d.o looking for
> >> my bug. If I find it I just add more information by email.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 01:32:47 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
(b...@iguanasuicide.net) wrote:
> On Saturday 2009 January 10 00:22:17 Bob Cox wrote:
> >Anyway, in your bug report you say you "took out" genisoimage, but then
> >go on to say you were able to successfully use mkisofs. However, on
On Saturday 2009 January 10 00:22:17 Bob Cox wrote:
>Anyway, in your bug report you say you "took out" genisoimage, but then
>go on to say you were able to successfully use mkisofs. However, on my
>system, mkisofs is just a symlink to genisoimage. In fact the package
>description for mkisofs say
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 21:32:20 -0500, Paul Cartwright (a...@pcartwright.com)
wrote:
> On Fri January 9 2009, Rainer Kluge wrote:
> > I am afraid that this bug report will have no effect. The problem
> > discussed in this thread seems to be a problem in the tools used by k3b
> > and not a probl
On Friday 2009 January 09 21:15:31 Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> I usually search/browse b.d.o looking for
>> my bug. If I find it I just add more information by email. If I am
>> unable to find it, I'll then use reportbug and generally tell repor
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> It's really a judgement call. I usually search/browse b.d.o looking for my
> bug. If I find it I just add more information by email. If I am unable to
> find it, I'll then use reportbug and generally tell reportbug that "None of
> these are
On Friday 2009 January 09 20:32:20 Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On Fri January 9 2009, Rainer Kluge wrote:
>> I am afraid that this bug report will have no effect. The problem
>> discussed in this thread seems to be a problem in the tools used by k3b
>> and not a problem in k3b itself. The bug report sh
On Fri January 9 2009, Rainer Kluge wrote:
> I am afraid that this bug report will have no effect. The problem
> discussed in this thread seems to be a problem in the tools used by k3b
> and not a problem in k3b itself. The bug report should be for growisofs.
> I would be surprised if the k3b maint
cate the thread.
> Your description "see thread is debian-user:
> Re: k3b & brasero don't work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X" is much harder
> to find than you might think, especially "later". A link to gmane or marc
> a al. would be best, I think.
here is the orig
On Fri January 9 2009, Rainer Kluge wrote:
> ...and you should try to give a more specific description of the
> problem. Does the write process fail?
yes it did. with K3B it would say completed, yet when I ejected the DVD & then
put it back in, it said it was blank. Other times, it wouldstart buri
On Friday 2009 January 09 16:37:23 Wayne Topa wrote:
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> it is possible that the bug may need to be reassigned (e.g. to
>> cdrkit or the kernel).
>
>I must be missing somthing here. Running Testing/unstable and the only
>cdrkit I can find is cdrkit-doc. Is this just
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Friday 2009 January 09 13:50:57 Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #499066
done.
Thank you. You also might want to subscribe to the bug to receive updates to
it as email. (Link at the bug page.) A
27;t want to
repeat information you've already given the mailing list, please add some URL
to the bug report that the maintainer can use to locate the thread. Your
description "see thread is debian-user:
Re: k3b & brasero don't work, nerolinux does- works ar 2X" is much h
3B stopped working, but Nerolinux works, and cdrecord works. Wodim
and genisoimage didn't work. somehow I have to log in to change the info,
or.. maybe I can just update reportbug... I'm not real happy with that
reportbug system, I probably should have just created a NEW bug, but that one
l
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. schrieb:
On Friday 2009 January 09 13:50:57 Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
Followup-For: Bug #499066
done.
Thank you. You also might want to subscribe to the bug to receive updates to
it as email. (Link at the bug page.)
gt; cdrkit or the kernel).
it also affected Brasero, which is the gnome tool, correct? Not sure that it
is kernel related, no kernel updates have been done in quite a while.. still
on 2.6.26-1
the problem is, I don't exactly know what broke, all I know is it stopped
working. K3B stopped
On Friday 2009 January 09 13:50:57 Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>Followup-For: Bug #499066
>
>done.
Thank you. You also might want to subscribe to the bug to receive updates to
it as email. (Link at the bug page.) Also,
https://bugs.kde.org/sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> There recently have been some mails from Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. and
> Johannes Wiedersich that have not been send to me, so it seems that the
> authors are not interested in a discussion.
This was not my intention.
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >point me in the right direction.
>
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
Package: k3b
Version: 1.0.5-3
Followup-For: Bug #499066
done.
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Fri January 9 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >point me in the right direction.
>
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
We strongly recommend that you report bugs in Debian using the reportbug
program. To install and start it, simply run:
aptitude install reportbug; reportbug
I'll
ion to reproduce the bug on his or her system.
> I have now created a large
> pile of coasters trying to get k3B, Brasero, and makedvd to work, without
> success. Nerolinux works everytime, and I was finally able to burn a DVD
> using mkisofs to create an iso image, and cdrecord to burn
On Fri January 9 2009, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> There is a setting in K3B where you specify the paths to the programs it
> uses. (Not sure the exact menu,but it is something like "Configure K3B".)
>
Settings menu-Configure k3b
> If your problem was solved with the original cdrecord, point k3b
of coasters trying
> to get k3B, Brasero, and makedvd to work, without success. Nerolinux works
> everytime, and I was finally able to burn a DVD using mkisofs to create an
> iso image, and cdrecord to burn it. Luckily I am command-line literate ( ok,
> somewhat) so I can create sc
working system that could burn a DVD any time I wanted.Under
SUSE 9-10.1 I could, and under Debian Etch I could, and probably earlier this
year under Lenny I could. I have now created a large pile of coasters trying
to get k3B, Brasero, and makedvd to work, without success. Nerolinux works
e
going to http://www.cdrkit.org/releases/ and
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/ then counting the number of releases since
2005 displayed.
>Given the fact that the initator of wodim stopped working on wodim on May
> 6th 2007 and started to advertize for nerolinux instead, it is interesting
>
at is just the way Debian sees things, and does
not say anything about the software itself or its author.
> Let me go back to the original topic.
>
> Given the fact that the initator of wodim stopped working on wodim on May 6th
> 2007 and started to advertize for nerolinux instead,
advertize for nerolinux instead, it is interesting to
read the term nerolinux in the subject of this thread. Is Debian moving to
closed software like nerolinux or what is the backgrund for not distrubuting
working CD/DVD/BD writing software with Debian? Did the initiator of wodim
intentionally introduce
On 01/09/2009 Joerg Schilling wrote:
Hi,
> It does not make sense to inform you about these details.
It is a pity you see it like that, see below.
> The people who are responsible for the violations and the redistributors are
> informed, they know that they are in conflit GPL and and that
>
John Hasler wrote:
> > The people behind wodim do not follow the conditions of the GPL and they
> > do not follow the conditions in the higher worthy Urbebertrechts law.
>
> > Whether the name is used directly or via a symlink does not matter. The
> > original names are used without permission an
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. writes:
> The DFSG doesn't mention the CDDL specifically, but I'm fairly sure CDDL
> is generally considered a free license. I could be wrong, DFSG-free is
> generally more strict that OSI-open.
The CDDL is DFSG-compliant.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Thursday 2009 January 08 04:14:02 Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>It _is_ a shame
>> that Debian does not come with the bug-free original software but with a
>> replacement that causes many problems for the Debian U
Joerg Schilling writes:
> Well, I did discuss the problems with a German specialized lawyer who is
> also active on the OSS community and it turns out that I am of course
> able to sue the people behind wodim for more than violation.
> ...
> The people behind wodim do not follow the conditions of
On Thursday 2009 January 08 08:08:58 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
>> On Wednesday 2009 January 07 10:23:52 Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> > The problem with wodim is that it is not a real fork.
>> > A fork is something that is supported,
>>
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> On Wednesday 2009 January 07 10:23:52 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > The problem with wodim is that it is not a real fork.
> > A fork is something that is supported,
>
> Not true. "In software engineering, a project fork happens wh
Joerg.Schilling writes:
> Debian acuses me for creating an alleged GPL problem.
Debian has accused you of nothing. Debian has determined that the license
conflict you have created could lead to legal problems for its distributors
and so has chosen not to distribute your software.
> Debian on the
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Debian on the other side violates GPL and Urheberrcht with the cdrkit fork.
> >
>
> I've seen you say that several times on this thread (an in other times),
> but I've missed the explanation of exactly why did this allegedly
> happen. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Debian on the other side violates GPL and Urheberrcht with the cdrkit fork.
You should consider filing a bug report (or point us to the relevant one
in case I missed it). Violation of a license or a law is considered RC,
IIUC.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Debian on the other side violates GPL and Urheberrcht with the cdrkit fork.
>
I've seen you say that several times on this thread (an in other times),
but I've missed the explanation of exactly why did this allegedly
happen. I also did not find it in the cdrecord site,
John Hasler wrote:
> Joerg.Schilling writes:
> > This seems to be an interesting claim.
>
> > If you only believe a lawsuit in court, then you would obviously not
> > believe the
> > claims from Debian. Nice to see!
>
> Debian is accusing no one of copyright infringement.
In case you did no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Jörg,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>It _is_ a shame
> that
> Debian does not come with the bug-free original software but with a
> replacement
> that causes many problems for the Debian Use
Joerg.Schilling writes:
> On the other side, Debian introduced problems with GPL and Urheberrecht
> in the fork so wodim/cdrkit cannot be legally distributed (see above).
I wrote:
> When and in what court was your lawsuit filed? Where can we read the
> decision? If no suit has been filed, where
Disclaimers: IANAL; IANADD; TINLA; TINASOTODP.
On Wednesday 2009 January 07 13:26:33 Joerg Schilling wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
> > Joerg.Schilling writes:
> > > On the other side, Debian introduced problems with GPL and Urheberrecht
> > > in the fork so wodim/cdrkit cannot be legally distribute
John Hasler wrote:
> Joerg.Schilling writes:
> > On the other side, Debian introduced problems with GPL and Urheberrecht
> > in the fork so wodim/cdrkit cannot be legally distributed (see above).
>
> When and in what court was your lawsuit filed? Where can we read the
> decision? If no suit has
Joerg.Schilling writes:
> On the other side, Debian introduced problems with GPL and Urheberrecht
> in the fork so wodim/cdrkit cannot be legally distributed (see above).
When and in what court was your lawsuit filed? Where can we read the
decision? If no suit has been filed, where can we read t
I'm sorry if anyone is on the CC list that doesn't want to be. I was simply
following Joerg's lead. I understand that unrequested CCing is against the
Code of Conduct @ http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct and will
gladly drop your address from my mails if requested.
On Wednesday
s supported, but wodim is unsupported.
This pseudo fork has been initiated by a person that soon stopped working on
the "fork" and then started to advertize for Nerolinux. Please explain
me the background for this kind of habbit!
>assertion that wodim violates the GPL and Germany's
Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > We had a server outage last weekend. If you still have problems, ask your
> > ISP for help, thousands of people are using ftp.berlios.de without any
> > problem.
> >
> > Jörg
>
> I am having problems getting to this site and downloading updates:
>
> http://freshmeat.net
an what it is defined to mean.
I seem to have issues getting files from his site.. even using --passive-ftp
fails.. I'll keep trying..
I guess my question is, what is NeroLinux using THAT WORKS, that K3B ISN'T..
I hate to use Nerolinux !
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
On Tuesday 2009 January 06 06:17:49 Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue January 6 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > >Are you sure it it using the "new cdrecord"?
> >
> > What do you understand by "new cdrecord"?
>
> I don't think I knew all of that, thanks for the background. Why do people
> always have
Please keep me on the CC!
Paul Cartwright wrote:
>> I recommand to have a look at the latest release (2.01.01a55) in
>> ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/
>> make sure to be root when calling make install, to allow cdrecord to be
>> installed suid root as needed on Linux.
>I have a48
>f
On Tue January 6 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> >Are you sure it it using the "new cdrecord"?
>
> What do you understand by "new cdrecord"?
>
I don't think I knew all of that, thanks for the background. Why do people
always have to mess with something that is working!!
>
> I recommand to have a
ear reasons.
There are no real bug fixes and there is no development in wodim.
Wodim still has more bugs than the original cdrecord it was based on.
Since May 2007, the initiator of the fork did not work on a single
change but rather advertizes for the closed source software "nerolinux&quo
On Mon January 5 2009, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > ok, I'm not sure if it was the addition of the new cdrecord that I
> > installed, but this just worked:
> > $ makedvd -burn -speed 2
>
> Are you sure it it using the "new cdrecord"?
no, how would I know? the man page doesn't show any options for cdr
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 07:37:56AM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Sat January 3 2009, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > Have you changed/upgraded any hardware, in particular, added any HDs?
> > Does /var/log/syslog show anything interesting?
> > Does it work from the command-line, using videotrans or
On Sat January 3 2009, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Have you changed/upgraded any hardware, in particular, added any HDs?
> Does /var/log/syslog show anything interesting?
> Does it work from the command-line, using videotrans or tovid or ...?
ok, I'm not sure if it was the addition of the new cdrecor
On Sat January 3 2009, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Have you changed/upgraded any hardware, in particular, added any HDs?
yes, actually I did add a second HD.. /dev/sdb
> Does /var/log/syslog show anything interesting?
It did show some errors but, no one at the time mentioned anything.
> Does it work
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 08:33:26PM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I've been having problems burning DVDs using K3B recently. I know I used to
> do
> this, not too long ago, maybe 2-3 months..
> Now I'm getting errors, and K3B says it burns the DVD, then ejects it, but it
> is empty. Or it stops
On Wed December 31 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > ii cdrecord 9:1.1.9-1 Dummy transition package for wodim
> > the link to the ftpde site seems to be down, or not available to me
> > now..
>
> Right. You'll have to install it from source.
that's what I was trying to get, get the tar
On 12/30/08 22:22, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Tue December 30 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
Wodim is a fork of cdrecord, which isn't in Debian anymore (which
itself is a long, fruitless discussion). You could install it from
source and hopefully tell k3b to use it.
I did aptitude install cdrecord, t
On Tue December 30 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Wodim is a fork of cdrecord, which isn't in Debian anymore (which
> itself is a long, fruitless discussion). You could install it from
> source and hopefully tell k3b to use it.
I did aptitude install cdrecord, then I got this:
ii cdrecord 9:1.
>Configuring Cdrkit, version 1.1.9
>CMake Error at wodim/CMakeLists.txt:18 (MESSAGE):
> Error: found a Linux system but no libcap header. Install libcap-dev.
Thanks! this is another hint that wodim is in conflict with the GPL.
Some notes:
k3b works best with cdrecord as cdrecord is well main
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 06:54:01 -0500, Paul Cartwright (a...@pcartwright.com)
wrote:
> On Mon December 29 2008, A. F. Cano wrote:
> > k3b uses wodim as a backend, so I think the problem is with wodim.
> > I tried it on a Philips CD/DVD writer SDVD6004. That gave the fewest
> > errors, but the
On 12/30/08 05:35, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Mon December 29 2008, A. F. Cano wrote:
Well, you're not alone. I spent days and wasted an untold amount
of blanks until I finally gave up.
so, what do you use in its place??
k3b uses wodim as a backend, so I think the problem is with wodim.
I tr
On Mon December 29 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> What kind of burner/media?
ok, so I wanted to install cdrkit. I see cdrkit-doc installed, but it can't
find cdrkit. So I download the source to cdrkit-1.1.9 and try a make:
# make
make: [build/Makefile] Error 1 (ignored)
cd build && cmake ..
CMake
On Mon December 29 2008, A. F. Cano wrote:
> k3b uses wodim as a backend, so I think the problem is with wodim.
> I tried it on a Philips CD/DVD writer SDVD6004. That gave the fewest
> errors, but the disks were useless afterward. They caused errors when
> read in the same drive. They could be r
On Mon December 29 2008, A. F. Cano wrote:
> Well, you're not alone. I spent days and wasted an untold amount
> of blanks until I finally gave up.
so, what do you use in its place??
>
> k3b uses wodim as a backend, so I think the problem is with wodim.
> I tried it on a Philips CD/DVD writer SDV
hrough and just stalls. I've tried cranking down the speed to 4X (
> 16X burner).
I have tried using different speeds on all 3 drives and wodim ignores
the requests. It goes ahead and burns at the speed the drive says it
can do it.
> I installed the demo for nerolinux, and burned a DVD t
d cranking down the speed to 4X (
16X burner).
I installed the demo for nerolinux, and burned a DVD the first time.
I am a member of the cdrom group, and I've tried to run k3b via a root
console, no luck.
what to look for? I also removed/purged K3B and reinstalled it. no change.
running Lenny,
installed the demo for nerolinux, and burned a DVD the first time.
I am a member of the cdrom group, and I've tried to run k3b via a root
console, no luck.
what to look for? I also removed/purged K3B and reinstalled it. no change.
running Lenny, up-to
I've been having problems burning DVDs using K3B recently. I know I used to do
this, not too long ago, maybe 2-3 months..
Now I'm getting errors, and K3B says it burns the DVD, then ejects it, but it
is empty. Or it stops about 30% of the way and errors out. I've tried slowing
down the burn rate
Atis wrote:
On 6/25/07, Orestes leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Folks!
Recently i've installed NeroLinux to taste the linux version, at that
moment
I didn't get the key, passed a few days when I execute NeroLinux this
show me
a alert box that "this program has expi
On 6/25/07, Orestes leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Folks!
Recently i've installed NeroLinux to taste the linux version, at that moment
I didn't get the key, passed a few days when I execute NeroLinux this show me
a alert box that "this program has expired", s
2007/6/26, Orestes leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Folks!
Recently i've installed NeroLinux to taste the linux version, at that
moment
I didn't get the key, passed a few days when I execute NeroLinux this show
me
a alert box that "this program has expired", so I del
Hi Folks!
Recently i've installed NeroLinux to taste the linux version, at that moment
I didn't get the key, passed a few days when I execute NeroLinux this show me
a alert box that "this program has expired", so I delete the $HOME/.nero folder,
reinstalled nero but this
99 matches
Mail list logo
