On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:07:59 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 February 2012 15:22:20 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> I feel your pain :-)
>
> You sound like Master Yoda :-D
>
> I hope this is not the way to the dark side...
I still have to think about that >>:-)
>> > Is there an
I would be interested for a solution.
Regards,
Alvin
On Feb 26, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 February 2012 15:22:20 +,
> Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> I was never very fond of sending emails in HTML format, but recently
>>> I changed of job and when my boss saw I was us
On Sunday, 26 February 2012 15:22:20 +,
Camaleón wrote:
> > I was never very fond of sending emails in HTML format, but recently
> > I changed of job and when my boss saw I was using a company's
> > signature without the company logo, he asked me to put the pictures
> > in the signature. It se
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:27:09 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I was never very fond of sending emails in HTML format, but recently I
> changed of job and when my boss saw I was using a company's signature
> without the company logo, he asked me to put the pictures in the
> signature. It seemed more
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I was never very fond of sending emails in HTML format, but recently I
> changed of job and when my boss saw I was using a company's signature
> without the company logo, he asked me to put the pictures in the
> signature. It seemed more a psychological than a real problem..
Hi all!
I was never very fond of sending emails in HTML format, but recently I
changed of job and when my boss saw I was using a company's signature
without the company logo, he asked me to put the pictures in the
signature. It seemed more a psychological than a real problem...
Is there any way
On Wednesday, 07.09.2005 at 13:13 +0100, Peter J Ross wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:52:28AM +0100, Peter J Ross wrote:
>
> > Drifting further off-topic, I notice that Mozilla Thunderbird
> > defaults to sending html email.
>
> No it doesn't, as I've learned after too hastily submitting a w
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:52:28AM +0100, Peter J Ross wrote:
> Drifting further off-topic, I notice that Mozilla Thunderbird defaults
> to sending html email.
No it doesn't, as I've learned after too hastily submitting a wishlist
bug (#327011). The default is to *compose* as HTML, but to *send*
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 06:44:21AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:06:22PM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
> > David Jardine wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> >
On Tuesday, 06.09.2005 at 06:51 +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> It's just that people on the list sometimes complain that someone has
> posted in html when it comes through as normal text for me, whereas I
> sometimes do get html attachments.
Some clients will send *both* plain text and HTML: Mutt
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:05:31PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Some MUAs can be configured to send the same message as both a plain
> text message and an HTML message, nothing very magical and only slightly
> more wastful than HTML alone.
Yes, I've noticed that. Wasteful maybe, but it gives yo
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:26:48PM -0400, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2005-09-06T03:47:55+0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > (a) the difference in the way mutt deals with html emails
> > (sometimes outputting them as normal text, sometimes presenting
> > them as attachments),
>
> I do not un
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:06:22PM -0700, James Vahn wrote:
> David Jardine wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> >> > Any way, have you any advice
> >>
> >> not using HTML...
> >
> > Us
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:47:55AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:23:15PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:04:58AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2005-09-0
On 2005-09-06T03:47:55+0200, David Jardine wrote:
> (a) the difference in the way mutt deals with html emails
> (sometimes outputting them as normal text, sometimes presenting
> them as attachments),
I do not understand the question. By default mutt list html files as
attachm
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:23:15PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:04:58AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> > > > Any way, have you any
David Jardine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
>> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
>> > Any way, have you any advice
>>
>> not using HTML...
>
> Using mutt, I see no html. Is this a bug or a feature of mutt?
> (I do ofte
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 01:04:58AM +0200, David Jardine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> > > Any way, have you any advice
> >
> > not using HTML...
>
> Using mutt, I see no html. Is t
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:09:31PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 16:36 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
> > Any way, have you any advice
>
> not using HTML...
Using mutt, I see no html. Is this a bug or a feature of mutt?
(I do often get html attachments - and also
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:55:02AM -0600, dman wrote:
| On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:46:29AM -0500, Jason M. Harvey wrote:
| | hello,
| |
| | i run mutt in Eterm. with $DISPLAY set, it launches galeon to view html,
| | but not only does galeon not find mutt.html (?), but i don't want to
| | spawn an
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:46:29AM -0500, Jason M. Harvey wrote:
| hello,
|
| i run mutt in Eterm. with $DISPLAY set, it launches galeon to view html,
| but not only does galeon not find mutt.html (?), but i don't want to
| spawn another window (galeon). so, i unset $DISPLAY in that term, and
| mu
hello,
i run mutt in Eterm. with $DISPLAY set, it launches galeon to view html,
but not only does galeon not find mutt.html (?), but i don't want to
spawn another window (galeon). so, i unset $DISPLAY in that term, and
mutt uses w3m to view html. this is nice, i like it better.
i just found w3m-im
22 matches
Mail list logo
