Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Simon L
Chris Metzler wrote: On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:15:14 + Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now I am all :S It wrote 362.600 FPS so I said to myself "how come". I ran "Tuxracer" and now it works... I don't know what happened, I don't know what I did, but now it works. 3 Hours before it didn't w

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Chris Metzler
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:15:14 + Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now I am all :S > It wrote 362.600 FPS so I said to myself "how come". I ran "Tuxracer" > and now it works... > I don't know what happened, I don't know what I did, but now it works. 3 > > Hours before it didn't worked and

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Simon L
Chris Metzler wrote: On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:55:05 + Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Chris Metzler wrote: On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:02:43 + Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will take a concrete example: "Tuxracer". I can run it (at approx 1frame/sec). Whoa. If y

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Chris Metzler
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:55:05 + Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Chris Metzler wrote: >>On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:02:43 + >>Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I will take a concrete example: "Tuxracer". I can run it (at approx >>> 1frame/sec). >> >> Whoa. If you're only getting 1 f

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Simon L
Chris Metzler wrote: On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:02:43 + Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I will take a concrete example: "Tuxracer". I can run it (at approx 1frame/sec). Whoa. If you're only getting 1 fps on tuxracer, that strongly suggests you're using software rendering rather than ha

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Chris Metzler
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:02:43 + Simon L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I will take a concrete example: "Tuxracer". I can run it (at approx > 1frame/sec). Whoa. If you're only getting 1 fps on tuxracer, that strongly suggests you're using software rendering rather than hardware. Can you run

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Simon L
Greg Folkert wrote: On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 05:02, Simon L wrote: I will take a concrete example: "Tuxracer". I can run it (at approx 1frame/sec). With any linux distribution, it is always at that speed that I go, except one time I got one that ran Tuxracer at a very good speed (like windows wi

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 05:02, Simon L wrote: > I will take a concrete example: "Tuxracer". I can run it (at approx > 1frame/sec). With any linux distribution, it is always at that speed > that I go, except one time I got one that ran Tuxracer at a very good > speed (like windows will). So I know

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-07 Thread Simon L
Erik Steffl wrote: Simon L wrote: Do you know where I could find informations on how to make my Debian computer go faster for all the media things? I know that my computer can go much more faster than now, because it does on Windows and I would like to do the same on linux. depends on what yo

Re: Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-06 Thread Erik Steffl
Simon L wrote: Do you know where I could find informations on how to make my Debian computer go faster for all the media things? I know that my computer can go much more faster than now, because it does on Windows and I would like to do the same on linux. depends on what you want and what is t

Multimedia Optimisation

2004-06-06 Thread Simon L
Do you know where I could find informations on how to make my Debian computer go faster for all the media things? I know that my computer can go much more faster than now, because it does on Windows and I would like to do the same on linux. Thanks for the links -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI