Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Joey Hess
Andrew n marshall wrote: > Ah.. yes. perl was pointing to an old copy of 5.6. Now I have removed > 5.6 completely, verified that both perl-5.005-base and perl-5.005 are > properly installed. Now this is the error I get: > > Can't locate object method "value" via package "Debconf::Question" at

Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Andrew n marshall
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > Andrew n marshall wrote: > > I think I should have phrased the above as a question: > > Since I have 5.005 installed and it still doesn't work, what else can I > > try or read? > > You can trying making use that /usr/bin/perl points to some version of > p

Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Joey Hess
Andrew n marshall wrote: > I think I should have phrased the above as a question: > Since I have 5.005 installed and it still doesn't work, what else can I > try or read? You can trying making use that /usr/bin/perl points to some version of perl which you have the full package, not just a perl-

Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Joey Hess
Dave Bresson wrote: > I'm all for that. Right now there's so many different versions and perl > packages (dependencies and conflicts) that i can't make heads or tails of > it. No, it's quite simple. In unstable there are two packages: perl-base perl Notice there are no longer versions or any of

Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Andrew n marshall
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > > > When will people learn? > > > > When there is obvious documentation on the difference, such in the > > description of the packages. If this is a reoccuring problem, then the > > current documentation on the issue should be revaluated. > > Unfortunatly

Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Dave Bresson
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Andrew n marshall wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > > Install perl-5.004 (not -base) > > I have perl-5.005.03-7 installed, which I would think would be enough. > > > When will people learn? > > When there is obvious documentation on the difference, such in the

Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Joey Hess
Andrew n marshall wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > > Install perl-5.004 (not -base) > > I have perl-5.005.03-7 installed, which I would think would be enough. > > > When will people learn? > > When there is obvious documentation on the difference, such in the > description of

Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Andrew n marshall
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > Install perl-5.004 (not -base) I have perl-5.005.03-7 installed, which I would think would be enough. > When will people learn? When there is obvious documentation on the difference, such in the description of the packages. If this is a reoccuring proble

Re: Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Joey Hess
Install perl-5.004 (not -base) When will people learn? -- see shy jo

Missing Warnings.pm => broken debconf

2001-02-20 Thread Andrew n marshall
Hi, In a recent attempt to install the Glide3 libraries from unstable, I recently broke my debconf. Apparently, I tried this during the Perl 5.6 package upheaval, which the new debconf relied on, and libglide3 relied on that. Currently, I am just looking to return to a working debconf since