On 04/11/2014 02:56 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
8< snip
Thus my question:
Is it possible to use debmirror, to mirror stable,testing,sid as well
as debian-security for stable and testing, and have them all share the
same package pool?
I can't see it, and I'm hoping I am simply not understanding
s
On 11/04/14 15:25, Lisi Reisz wrote:
("One" is very clumsy in
> English, but in this case I felt that the second person would appear
> to target Zenaan.)
Best Queen's English, Lisi ;)
--
Tony van der Hoff | mailto:t...@vanderhoff.org
Ariège, France |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Friday 11 April 2014 03:46:49 Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> In my foggy memory, that at least for debian stable, I seem to
> remember something about security updates all get collected up,
> possibly with other updates (??) and they become the next stable
> point release.
Erm... No! I can accept th
On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> Thus my question:
>> Is it possible to use debmirror, to mirror stable,testing,sid as well
>> as debian-security for stable and testing, and have them all share the
>> same package pool?
> I guess another way to answer my
On 4/11/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Thus my question:
> Is it possible to use debmirror, to mirror stable,testing,sid as well
> as debian-security for stable and testing, and have them all share the
> same package pool?
In particular, for example, I stopped my initial debian-security (off
of aar
I currently know to some degree, and use, debmirror.
I admin/help-desk for quite a few people in a rural area - the PCs I
admin are typically only connected to the Internet via high-latency,
low-bandwidth internet connections.
So, I run a debian mirror from a particular host which has a
high-band
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> I have not myself used LVM mirroring. I have only used mdadm MD
>>> mirroring. This means I am fuzzy on your exact configuration. But
>>> the above tells me that you
Tom H wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I have not myself used LVM mirroring. I have only used mdadm MD
> > mirroring. This means I am fuzzy on your exact configuration. But
> > the above tells me that you have the root volume directly on lvm using
> > the rootVG-ro
6.32-5-686 root=/dev/mapper/rootVG-rootLV ro
>> quiet
>> echo'Loading initial ramdisk ...'
>> initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
>> }
>
> I have not myself used LVM mirroring. I have only used mdadm MD
> mirroring. This means I am fuzzy on your
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Luca Saletta wrote:
> Dear Mailinglist
> ...
> The mirroring ist done but as soon as i try to reboot my system, it
> doesn't starts up and im entering the "grub recover"-mode.
>
Where you can't boot before you do the mirror, it
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set
> 809a5d50-9789-4e56-952d-868cb243cd0c
> echo'Loading Linux 2.6.32-5-686 ...'
> linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686 root=/dev/mapper/rootVG-rootLV ro
> quiet
> echo'Loading initial ramdisk ...'
7;ve created,
was no problem. But as soon as I tried to set the mirroring my problem
came up.
The mirroring ist done but as soon as i try to reboot my system, it
doesn't starts up and im entering the "grub recover"-mode.
I used following commands :
Resizing a FS - lvextend –L +500M
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Note that after a power cycle even if the RAID 1 array needs to be
> sync'd between the mirrored disks that the system will still boot okay
> and will operate normally. I have no idea what other systems do but
> you can boot the system, log in
Bob Proulx wrote:
> The Linus software raid also had the capability to use a block bitmap
> to speed up resync after a crash because then it tracks which blocks
> are dirty.
> See the documentation on this mdadm command to configure an internal
> bitmap to speed up a re-sync after an event such
yudi v wrote:
> I am looking at using Debian software RAID mirroring and would like
> to know how it handles system crashes and disk failures.
It handles it quite well.
> My only experience with software RAID 1 is with windows 7 inbuilt
> option. Whenever the system does not shut
Hi all,
I am looking at using Debian software RAID mirroring and would like to know
how it handles system crashes and disk failures.
My only experience with software RAID 1 is with windows 7 inbuilt option.
Whenever the system does not shutdown cleanly, upon reboot the disks start
resynching and
26/01/2012 23:07, Joey L wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> When I boot the system with all drives in, I get the superflous error.
>>>
>>> So the only way to boot is only to put in /dev/sdc alone and boot.
>>> when i get to a linux prompt, I insert the second drive into the system
>>> /dev/sdd
>>>
>>> To sync the
> You could check whether grub's OK via bootinfoscript (although the
> only real test'll be a reboot...).
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/bootinfoscript/
>
thanks for the script - will check it out
>
>>> My parted -l is:
>>>
>>> Disk /dev/sda: 1000GB
>>> Number Start End Size Type
>>
>> My configuration is as such:
>> /dev/md0 = /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdd1
>> /dev/md1 = /dev/sda1 and /dev/sb1
>>
>> My swap partitions are not part of the array or mirror at all -
>> they are just regular partitions - they are:
>> /dev/sdc2 and /dev/sdd2.
>
> Any particular reason do do that ?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:35 PM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> 25/01/2012 19:16, Joey L wrote:
>> Okay..I am telling all in this email -:)
>>
>> My configuration is as such:
>> /dev/md0 = /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdd1
>> /dev/md1 = /dev/sda1 and /dev/sb1
>>
>> My swap partitions are not part o
25/01/2012 19:16, Joey L wrote:
In-line reply ;
> Okay..I am telling all in this email -:)
>
> My configuration is as such:
> /dev/md0 = /dev/sdc1 and /dev/sdd1
> /dev/md1 = /dev/sda1 and /dev/sb1
>
> My swap partitions are not part of the array or mirror at all -
> they are just regular p
es
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x0005d0fd
>>
>>
>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> /dev/sdd1 1 121091 97
24/01/2012 19:10, Joey L wrote:
> Sorry to load up on related issues in this mail, but have a big issue:
> After having synced my mirrored drives in software raid -
> I get the following error:
> error: superfluous RAID member (2 found).
There is a good chance that the error reported is more cosme
2 Linux swap / Solaris
>
>
> thanks
> mjh
>
What are you trying to achieve exactly ? fdisk knows nothing about mdadm
raid, here you say that /dev/sdd is part of a mirroring raid (each
partitions are I guess), and later you are working with fdisk on
/dev/sdd2. If /dev/sdd2 is part
Sorry to load up on related issues in this mail, but have a big issue:
After having synced my mirrored drives in software raid -
I get the following error:
error: superfluous RAID member (2 found).
the boot drive is /dev/sdc1 but added another one to the mirror - /dev/sdd1
my questions :
1. should
In related questions - i hope you can answer - are :
1. why do i get an error when trying to make swap partition - i get
this error below after running fdisk, creating a primary partition
/dev/sdd2 and then changing the type - with t -
As in below ---
2. the /dev/sdd drive is the mirrored drive i
Jon Dowland writes:
>
> Pretty sure at that stage it has loaded modules that let it interpret
> a selection of filesystem types, in order to fetch grub.cfg (and
> further
How does it decide which partition (on which disk) and what pathname
to use to find grub.cfg. I assume one it chooses a part
On 18/01/12 16:23, Joey L wrote:
When i put the drive sda into the system to add it back to the md0 -
the system keeps booting from it and refuses to boot from the good sdb
drive.
Boot with just the good drive; degrade the array (fail the missing
drive); relabel your root partition (whatever i
On 19/01/12 02:04, Marc Auslander wrote:
Now, does that code contain a copy of grub.cfg? Or
does it read it from someplace? If the second, how does it decide
where/how to read grub.cfg.
I understand how, once it has grub.cfg, it decides what to boot. It's
where grub.cfg comes from that I don'
19/01/2012 01:43, Joey L wrote:
> Also - is there a way in debian to realize which drive is mapped to
> which linux device ??
> When I go into the bios - i see disk labels or names as DSK04, DSK02
> and also long string of numbers - i guess it is the serial number of
> drive.
For partition UUID:
19/01/2012 00:03, Joey L wrote:
> Sorry - just a couple of last things:
>
>
> 1. do i run the command - "grub-install --recheck --no-floppy
> /dev/sdc1" and "grub-install --recheck --no-floppy /dev/sdd1" ???
>
> or do I run it on the whole drive meaning - "grub-install --recheck
> --no-floppy
This discussion opens a question I've been curious about.
IIUC, bios choses a boot device and runs the MBR code. Assuming
that's GRUB2 MBR code, GRUB2 then loads the 1.5 code hidden before the
first partition of the same device. Next step is to process grub.cfg.
Now, does that code contain a co
Also - is there a way in debian to realize which drive is mapped to
which linux device ??
When I go into the bios - i see disk labels or names as DSK04, DSK02
and also long string of numbers - i guess it is the serial number of
drive.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Joey L wrote:
> Sorry - just
Sorry - just a couple of last things:
1. do i run the command - "grub-install --recheck --no-floppy
/dev/sdc1" and "grub-install --recheck --no-floppy /dev/sdd1" ???
or do I run it on the whole drive meaning - "grub-install --recheck
--no-floppy /dev/sdc" and "grub-install --recheck --no-flopp
18/01/2012 22:22, Joey L wrote:
> okay..thanks for the clarification.
> I think it was initrd - busybox.
>
> my debian version is:
> root@rider:~# lsb_release -a
> No LSB modules are available.
> Distributor ID: Debian
> Description:Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.3 (squeeze)
> Release:6.0.3
> Co
okay..thanks for the clarification.
I think it was initrd - busybox.
my debian version is:
root@rider:~# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.3 (squeeze)
Release:6.0.3
Codename: squeeze
uname -mrs
Linux 2.6.32-5-am
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 13:38 -0500, Joey L wrote:
> thanks for the reply -
>
> 1. my issue is that i am not getting to the grub menu on the good
> disk, it always goes to the bad one.
> I think it puts me in a intrdfsram prompt or something similar - even
> if i change the bios settings.
> - so edi
18/01/2012 19:38, Joey L wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:49 PM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
>> > 18/01/2012 18:03, Joey L wrote:
>>> >> The issue I am having is that if I put into the system both drives,
>>> >> the system always chooses the faulty drive.
>>> >> I do not even get linux sy
thanks for the reply -
1. my issue is that i am not getting to the grub menu on the good
disk, it always goes to the bad one.
I think it puts me in a intrdfsram prompt or something similar - even
if i change the bios settings.
- so editing the grub menu option - is unavailable for me.
2. regardin
18/01/2012 18:03, Joey L wrote:
> The issue I am having is that if I put into the system both drives,
> the system always chooses the faulty drive.
> I do not even get linux system - i get a weird text prompt - i think
> it is initrdfs - even if i change it in the bios.
>
> On installing grub - ca
The issue I am having is that if I put into the system both drives,
the system always chooses the faulty drive.
I do not even get linux system - i get a weird text prompt - i think
it is initrdfs - even if i change it in the bios.
On installing grub - can you tell me what is the procedure for that
18/01/2012 17:23, Joey L wrote:
> I have a raid 1 mdadm setup.
> I have devices sda and sdb with 2 partitions on each - sda1 and sda2
> on the other drive i have sdb1 and sdb2.
>
> Partition sda1 is the root partition and sda2 is the swap partition.
>
> My sda failed yesterday and now i am runnin
I have a raid 1 mdadm setup.
I have devices sda and sdb with 2 partitions on each - sda1 and sda2
on the other drive i have sdb1 and sdb2.
Partition sda1 is the root partition and sda2 is the swap partition.
My sda failed yesterday and now i am running in sdb only.
When i put the drive sda into
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 01:40:59AM -, Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> I have a few debian unstable boxes that I like to keep up-to-date.
>
> Currently, I run apt-cacher-ng (a proxy for apt-get which stores
> packages so they don't need to be downloaded again) on my gateway box
> (lenny 32-bit), so
On Mon,31.May.10, 01:40:59, Cameron Hutchison wrote:
>
> I've looked at apt-proxy, apt-cacher, apt-cacher-ng and approx, but they
> all appear to download on demand, not according to a schedule.
Maybe apt-zip or apt-offline (not in lenny) can be used for what you
need.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offto
Celejar writes:
>Cameron Hutchison wrote:
>> >and then have the gateway box get those packages.
>>
>> hmmm. How? Is there an existing tool that will do this? Doing it
>> manually (in a script) would require too much work (essentially
>> implementing apt-get -d dist-upgrade against a specifie
On Mon, 31 May 2010 04:09:19 -
Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> >Cameron Hutchison wrote:
>
> >> Is there some way to do an
> >> intelligent partial mirror of the archive of what is installed on other
> >> boxes, without too much overhead of managing a package list? (i.e. I don
Celejar writes:
>Cameron Hutchison wrote:
>> Is there some way to do an
>> intelligent partial mirror of the archive of what is installed on other
>> boxes, without too much overhead of managing a package list? (i.e. I dont
>> want to have to manually update some package list on my lenny box whe
On Mon, 31 May 2010 01:40:59 -
Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> I have a few debian unstable boxes that I like to keep up-to-date.
>
> Currently, I run apt-cacher-ng (a proxy for apt-get which stores
> packages so they don't need to be downloaded again) on my gateway box
> (lenny 32-bit), so I don
I have a few debian unstable boxes that I like to keep up-to-date.
Currently, I run apt-cacher-ng (a proxy for apt-get which stores
packages so they don't need to be downloaded again) on my gateway box
(lenny 32-bit), so I don't double download from my couple of other boxes
(sid 64-bit). This work
2009/6/9 michal krajcirovic :
> hello,
> solves a simple problem complicated solution:)
>
> I have two servers, one on the disk any data that need to the second.
You could try drbd
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
hello,
solves a simple problem complicated solution:)
I have two servers, one on the disk any data that need to the second.
Currently exports to the disc via NFS, however, load the disk is too big
and the whole is slow.
Then I need in two places at the same time maintain the same data. Among
Dennis Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
I remember there was a discussion sometime back about this but I can't
locate it.
Here is my situation. I have six Debian/Lenny machines that I have to
update/upgrade at various times, and some of these runs take hours for
each system over my 768Kbs connection
> Here is my situation. I have six Debian/Lenny machines that I have to
> update/upgrade at various times, and some of these runs take hours for each
> system over my 768Kbs connection.
Same here. For various reasons, I found apt-cacher and friends
unsuitable for my needs (can't remember the reas
On Mar 12, 12:40 pm, "Stackpole, Chris"
wrote:
> > From: Dennis Wicks [mailto:w...@mgssub.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:22 AM
> > Subject: Local mirroring How-To?
>
> > Greetings;
>
> > I remember there was a discussion sometime back ab
> From: Dennis Wicks [mailto:w...@mgssub.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 11:22 AM
> Subject: Local mirroring How-To?
>
> Greetings;
>
> I remember there was a discussion sometime back about this
> but I can't locate it.
>
> Here is my situation. I have
Dennis Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
I remember there was a discussion sometime back about this but I can't
locate it.
Here is my situation. I have six Debian/Lenny machines that I have to
update/upgrade at various times, and some of these runs take hours for
each system over my 768Kbs connection
Greetings;
I remember there was a discussion sometime back about this
but I can't locate it.
Here is my situation. I have six Debian/Lenny machines that
I have to update/upgrade at various times, and some of these
runs take hours for each system over my 768Kbs connection.
I have the space
er had disk
failures.
Currently, I have no software RAID on my system yet. Just a small /boot
partition, and a huge LVM partition for everything else. I recently
discovered I could use LVM's mirroring capabilities. This would probably be
easiest and fastest for me, since I wouldn't have to t
On 6 Sep., 00:40, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jens wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity, what exactly did you do?
>
> I'll have to dig up the configs, will send a reply when I find them..
Thanks!
> > OK, I do this with quotas mainly. I haven't yet come across a scenario
> > where these were
Jens wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what exactly did you do?
-- snip from kickstart --
# manually isntall grub
cat >/tmp/grub.txt <&1 | tee /root/grub-install.txt
-- end snip --
Now that I thought about it I never did have a disk failure
so I didn't actually test it.. BUT without doing that u
Jens wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what exactly did you do?
I'll have to dig up the configs, will send a reply when I find
them..
> That was an advantage, true.
> Nowadays you can mount using UUIDs or disk labels which also works
> fine.
Yeah that's true..
> OK, I do this with quotas mainly.
e fly as needed.
I also looked at lvm mirror, the difference is lvm need a bitmap (which
you have the option of keeping in memory - which is transient). The
overhead of using lvm raid1 did not seem worth it (echo by my results
from googling)
Alex
>
> I have read contradicting reports reg
LVM, and not use LVM's mirror
feature?
Any specific reason?
I have read contradicting reports regarding performance - one said LVM
mirroring was faster since it read from both disks in parallel, one
said the same about MD.
What is your experience?
> mySQL servers and it works great. We do n
On 5 Sep., 20:10, "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jens wrote:
> > Generally I would like to hear any experiences with LVM2 you can
> > offer.
> > The last time I tried LVM I hosed everything, but that was eight years
> > ago, at least partly due to a user error, and with LVM1 on Debian
> > Woo
We use LVM and software raid via md on every server. We use md to run raid
10 arrays and then we use LVM on top of that. We use snapshots to backup our
mySQL servers and it works great. We do nightly snapshots and rsync/tar that
stuff to central on line storage server. Though we do have to issue a
Jens wrote:
> Generally I would like to hear any experiences with LVM2 you can
> offer.
> The last time I tried LVM I hosed everything, but that was eight years
> ago, at least partly due to a user error, and with LVM1 on Debian
> Woody
> with a self-compiled kernel on 2.4.2x.
I would stick to MD
utilities, to ease upgrades.
Questions:
-- Generally: Is it a good idea to use LVM2 mirroring or should I
stick to
MD for mirroring, and use LVM only for the snapshots? This seems
overcomplicated.
-- Can Lenny create and use mirrored LVM partitions? I tried a test
installation in VMware but the inst
I suppose you have multiples interfaces on your 192.168.1.10. Normally,
you have multiple IP addresses on your 192.168.1.10, one address for
each interface. If you bridge interfaces, all your interfaces will have
one and only one IP address 192.168.1.10. If you prefer, your machine
(192.168.1.1
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Bonnel Christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why don't you bridge the interfaces of 192.168.1.10?
I don't have in depth experience with bridging, would you mind
explaining a little bit about it please. (Example tutorial pointers will
be appreciated.)
> In that case, you ne
Why don't you bridge the interfaces of 192.168.1.10 ? In that case, you
need to reconfigure client to point to 192.168.1.20 and you can sniff
your network via the 192.168.1.10 machine ?
Hope this helps,
Christophe
Volkan YAZICI a écrit :
Hi,
In one of our servers, I want to debug a network
Hi,
In one of our servers, I want to debug a network server daemon. The
problem is I don't have luxury for a downtime or to iterrupt related
server's network traffic. Current routing structure looks like below.
VPN Switch (192.168.1.1) -> Server Machine (192.168.1.2)
To debug the related serve
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:13:16AM -0400, Zach Uram wrote:
> How exactly can I do this:
>
> There is a website I wish to mirror. It has many pages and images and
> it uses CSS.
>
> I wish to run wget and have it:
> 1) download all HTML/CSS/images
> 2) uses local references so HREF="http://site.o
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:13:16 -0400
"Zach Uram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How exactly can I do this:
>
> There is a website I wish to mirror. It has many pages and images and
> it uses CSS.
You also might be interested in httrack.
> Zach
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via
Zach Uram escreveu:
How exactly can I do this:
There is a website I wish to mirror. It has many pages and images and
it uses CSS.
I wish to run wget and have it:
1) download all HTML/CSS/images
2) uses local references so http://site.org/images/image.jpg";> will be saved as
3) do the same thin
How exactly can I do this:
There is a website I wish to mirror. It has many pages and images and
it uses CSS.
I wish to run wget and have it:
1) download all HTML/CSS/images
2) uses local references so http://site.org/images/image.jpg";> will be saved as
3) do the same thing for CSS etc.
I am n
Thanks for reply,
I added the official Release and the gpg files to the approprate
place dists/etch ( I am using etch/R3), but I got same error unable
to find the Release file.
Maybe this can help to understand:When I start the client
machine, the dhcp and tftp ran correctly ( the addre
Please do not start a new thread unless the new problem is totally
unrelated.
abdelkader belahcene wrote:
Thanks for reply,
I put in the server as it is described in the doc, the netboot, and
used the tftp, it runs correctly, and started nice,
when it asked for the mirror, If I declare an off
Thanks for reply,
I put in the server as it is described in the doc, the netboot, and
used the tftp, it runs correctly, and started nice,
when it asked for the mirror, If I declare an official mirror, it
runs correctly, and installed, when I declare my own mirror, I fails.
I mean by my own mirror
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 09:55:41AM -0400, harland christofferson wrote:
>
> i have a sarge installation.
>
> i have two ide drives (hda and hdc) that are partitioned identically.
>
> when doing the install a while ago, i tried to configure partitions for
> raid1 but some how goofed.
>
> i canno
also sprach harland christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.04.1555 +0200]:
> has anyone successfully implemented raid1 on an existing system by using
> raid tools and mdadm?
README.recipes says how to do that.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. mart
i have a sarge installation.
i have two ide drives (hda and hdc) that are partitioned identically.
when doing the install a while ago, i tried to configure partitions for
raid1 but some how goofed.
i cannot risk losing data on hda while getting raid1 up and running.
has anyone successfully imp
Douglas Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:38:43PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
There is a server(sarge) that I maintain that used to be mirrored and
all was well. However, the mirror was recently broken and when trying to
rebuild, I run into an interesting problem.
The array rebuilds t
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:38:43PM +, Shri Shrikumar wrote:
> There is a server(sarge) that I maintain that used to be mirrored and
> all was well. However, the mirror was recently broken and when trying to
> rebuild, I run into an interesting problem.
>
> The array rebuilds to about 80% and t
Hi All,
I tried posting this yesterday while not subscribed and didn't look like
it got through - so trying again after subscribing. If it gets through
twice - please accept my apologies.
I wonder if someone can help me with a problem that I am having.
There is a server(sarge) that I maintai
On 6/24/06, Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am repeating this issue to give it it's own subject line and thread.
Since the change from marillat to debian-multimedia I have not yet found a
satisfactory way of mirroring debian-multimedia. The site does not seem to offer
anonymous r
Marty wrote:
Since the change from marillat to debian-multimedia I have not yet found a
satisfactory way of mirroring debian-multimedia. The site does not seem to offer
anonymous rsync or ftp, and wget and debmirror don't work as I expect them to.
Replying to my own posting, I have found
I am repeating this issue to give it it's own subject line and thread.
Since the change from marillat to debian-multimedia I have not yet found a
satisfactory way of mirroring debian-multimedia. The site does not seem to offer
anonymous rsync or ftp, and wget and debmirror don't
Colin wrote:
Ryan Nowakowski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 11:06:44PM +0800, Muthukumaran Saravanan wrote:
Will Debian supports Intel 64 bit processor.
Yes: http://www.debian.org/ports/ia64/
I don't think Muthukumaran means Itanium. The amd64 architecture is
probably what he means.
Ryan Nowakowski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 11:06:44PM +0800, Muthukumaran Saravanan wrote:
>
>>Will Debian supports Intel 64 bit processor.
>
> Yes: http://www.debian.org/ports/ia64/
I don't think Muthukumaran means Itanium. The amd64 architecture is
probably what he means.
--
To UNSUB
.
apt-get install samba
> How to setup mirroring using debian in the same server. I have 2 73 GB SCSI
> Harddisk, for this i want to setup mirroring.
apt-get install mdadm
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear all,
I want some technical details.
Will Debian supports Intel 64 bit processor.
I want to install debian file server which the data should be shared with windows clients, need to install smb server also.
How to setup mirroring using debian in the same server. I have 2 73 GB SCSI
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 04:08:08PM -0500, Marty wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> >If the drives are *exactly* identical, you can move your old drive to be
> >the slave on the secondary ide channel, which makes it hdd. Then place
> >the new drive on hda. Boot Knoppix, or another suitable li
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:15:56PM -0500, Marty wrote:
I plan to mirror then replace a hard drive, using an identical model drive.
Instead of a device-device copy e.g. "cp /dev/hda /dev/hdb" I hope to do
"cp image" followed by cp image " where "image" is
a disk image
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 04:08:08PM -0500, Marty wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> >If the drives are *exactly* identical, you can move your old drive to be
> >the slave on the secondary ide channel, which makes it hdd. Then place
> >the new drive on hda. Boot Knoppix, or another suitable li
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
If the drives are *exactly* identical, you can move your old drive to be
the slave on the secondary ide channel, which makes it hdd. Then place
the new drive on hda. Boot Knoppix, or another suitable live CD distro,
and then do this:
dd if=/dev/hdd of=/dev/hda
That
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 03:15:56PM -0500, Marty wrote:
> I plan to mirror then replace a hard drive, using an identical model drive.
>
> Instead of a device-device copy e.g. "cp /dev/hda /dev/hdb" I hope to do
> "cp image" followed by cp image " where "image" is
> a disk image file of the origina
I plan to mirror then replace a hard drive, using an identical model drive.
Instead of a device-device copy e.g. "cp /dev/hda /dev/hdb" I hope to do
"cp image" followed by cp image " where "image" is
a disk image file of the original drive.
Will the physical sector arrangment be preserved using
On Friday 30 September 2005 05:11 pm, Radhika wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are going to host the webserver for our ISP and we need to install
> high availability.So is there any free webcluster software`with more
> reliability and good performance or free mirroring software to
> c
Hi,
We are going to host the webserver for our ISP and we need to install high availability.So is there any free webcluster software`with morereliability and good performance or free mirroring software to configure this.I am planning to install this on debian linux.
Thanks for your help
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
