Re: Merits of approxy

2008-10-18 Thread Bob
Sylvain Le Gall wrote: I was using apt-proxy 3 years ago and it randomly have failures (404 from time to time). It was also quite slow to my mind (considering the fact that it is a proxy). Since then, I use approx (etch version and now backport version). Never had a failure and it is fast (as I

Re: Merits of approxy

2008-10-06 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 05-10-2008, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 04:39:33 -0700 > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 14:38 -0400, Celejar wrote: >> > approx >> > >> > [I use approx; various readers of this list have their own preferences.] >> >> I'm curious,

Re: Merits of approxy

2008-10-05 Thread Celejar
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 04:39:33 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 14:38 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > approx > > > > [I use approx; various readers of this list have their own preferences.] > > I'm curious, what does approx bring to the table in comparison to the > o

Merits of approxy

2008-10-05 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 14:38 -0400, Celejar wrote: > approx > > [I use approx; various readers of this list have their own preferences.] I'm curious, what does approx bring to the table in comparison to the others? -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitall