Re: Merging workstation and server systems

2005-06-29 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:16:04PM +0200, VSJ wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Why not just run sarge for everything? > > So then why the need to run etch packages > > for logged in users? > > No one knows how long it will take before etch becomes stable. I don't want > to run old softwar

Re: Merging workstation and server systems

2005-06-27 Thread VSJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why not just run sarge for everything? > So then why the need to run etch packages > for logged in users? No one knows how long it will take before etch becomes stable. I don't want to run old software for workstation desktop users (sarge will be ancient in three years

Re: Merging workstation and server systems

2005-06-27 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 08:09:13AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting VSJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >Hi, > >I've a small home network, with an old server system, running Woody and > >WWW/mail/proxy/NFS/Samba/NIS services. This system is up 24/7. > >I also have another old system, acting as a

Re: Merging workstation and server systems

2005-06-27 Thread michael
Quoting VSJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, I've a small home network, with an old server system, running Woody and WWW/mail/proxy/NFS/Samba/NIS services. This system is up 24/7. I also have another old system, acting as a workstation, currently running Etch and physically located next to the server

Merging workstation and server systems

2005-06-27 Thread VSJ
Hi, I've a small home network, with an old server system, running Woody and WWW/mail/proxy/NFS/Samba/NIS services. This system is up 24/7. I also have another old system, acting as a workstation, currently running Etch and physically located next to the server system. This system is also up 24/7.