Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:46:11AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>> Is it correct to assume that any given debian package whose name is of
>> the form lib.*-perl corresponds to one and only one CPAN module,
>
> Not quite, but more or less.
>
>> and that the
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:46:11AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>> Is it correct to assume that any given debian package whose name is of
>> the form lib.*-perl corresponds to one and only one CPAN module,
>
> Not quite, but more or less.
>
>> and that the
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:46:11AM -0500, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
> Is it correct to assume that any given debian package whose name is of
> the form lib.*-perl corresponds to one and only one CPAN module,
Not quite, but more or less.
> and that the algorithm for determining the corresponding debian
Is it correct to assume that any given debian package whose name is of
the form lib.*-perl corresponds to one and only one CPAN module, and
that the algorithm for determining the corresponding debian package name
from a given CPAN module name is this? ...
- Add a leading "lib" and a trailing "-per
4 matches
Mail list logo
