On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 11:07:44PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > > > Emailled to you. I am guessing we'll soon see the patch applied to the
> > > > procmail in slink, which is cool by me. =>
> > >
> > > you got me again... what is slink?
> >
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 11:07:44PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > > Emailled to you. I am guessing we'll soon see the patch applied to the
> > > procmail in slink, which is cool by me. =>
> >
> > you got me again... what is slink?
> >
>
> Next release of debian... bo--> hamm --> slink
On Fri, Apr 24, 1998 at 01:51:06AM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
> > Emailled to you. I am guessing we'll soon see the patch applied to the
> > procmail in slink, which is cool by me. =>
>
> you got me again... what is slink?
That's the new unstable. There was a request for objection to the patch
g
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Adam Shand wrote:
>
> > Emailled to you. I am guessing we'll soon see the patch applied to the
> > procmail in slink, which is cool by me. =>
>
> you got me again... what is slink?
>
Next release of debian... bo--> hamm --> slink
1.3.1
> Emailled to you. I am guessing we'll soon see the patch applied to the
> procmail in slink, which is cool by me. =>
you got me again... what is slink?
> not sure, check www.qmail.org, they list most of the patches there.
ya ... nothing for cucipop though ... have to keep searching.
adam.
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 12:38:19AM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
> > Currently the only way to use maildir with sendmail is via the (excellent)
> > procmail patch.
>
> hi,
Hi back =>
> do you (or anyone else) have link for the maildir patch for procmail? i
> am in the process of tuning a nfs moun
> Currently the only way to use maildir with sendmail is via the (excellent)
> procmail patch.
hi,
do you (or anyone else) have link for the maildir patch for procmail? i
am in the process of tuning a nfs mounted /var/mail and one of the things
i am considering is migrating to maildir format.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Paul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > [ do some changes, for example, removing -lcrypt somewhere ]
>
> what kind of changes? why remove the -lcrypt? I'm using the lastest
> debian/hamm, so I do have glibc.
O
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Santiago Vila wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP DECRYPTED MESSAGE-
> On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Paul Miller wrote:
>
> > I got the copy from the unstable tree to compile, but the binary file is
> > well over 2 megs... which is 4 times the size of the distributed copy! Do
> > I need to dis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Paul Miller wrote:
> I got the copy from the unstable tree to compile, but the binary file is
> well over 2 megs... which is 4 times the size of the distributed copy! Do
> I need to disable debugging or change the optimization? If so, how?
PGP DECRYPTED MESSAGE-
> On Mon, 2 Feb 1998, Paul Miller wrote:
>
> > is there any plans for adding Qmail's Maildir support to the following
> > packages soon?
> >
> > pine (there already is a patch, but I couldn't compile it)
>
> The one in un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 2 Feb 1998, Paul Miller wrote:
> is there any plans for adding Qmail's Maildir support to the following
> packages soon?
>
> pine (there already is a patch, but I couldn't compile it)
The one in unstable has the patch alread
is there any plans for adding Qmail's Maildir support to the following
packages soon?
pine (there already is a patch, but I couldn't compile it)
cfinger (does need one? how can I fix it to check maildirs?)
login (seems to not like the QMAIL_DIR parameter.. possible bug?)
Thanks
Pa
13 matches
Mail list logo
