Re: Mail front end

2000-02-12 Thread webmaster
> > As we are at the topic: > > where can I find "pine" on Debian V2.1.9 slink? > > Binaries are available from: > ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/ > > Pine has a "weird" kind of license, which, IIRC, > prohibits the distribution of pre-compiled binaries > (such as .rpm's or .deb's), but you can do

Re: Mail front end

2000-02-12 Thread Jeremy Gaddis
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Can anyone tell me if there is a supported and > > fairly bug-free front end for mail? > As we are at the topic: > where can I find "pine" on Debian V2.1.9 slink? Binaries are available from: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/ Pine has a "weird" kind

Re: Mail front end

2000-02-12 Thread webmaster
> Can anyone tell me if there is a supported and > fairly bug-free front end for mail? As we are at the topic: where can I find "pine" on Debian V2.1.9 slink? Uwe

Mail front end

2000-02-12 Thread Timothy Bedding
Can anyone tell me if there is a supported and fairly bug-free front end for mail? Something using an X window (so not mutt). I think someone mentioned exmh. Is that right? Is it supported by people? Are there any bugs? Cordially Tim

Mail front end

2000-01-29 Thread Timothy Bedding
Hello. I am trying to get Ishmail to work. If Phillip Deackes or anyone else with experience with using Ishmail, can help me, I would be grateful. Ishmail seems to require popclient to get mail but on my system popclient is just a symbolic link to fetchmail which is quite a different program. Ho

Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread claw
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999 20:12:34 + (GMT) Phillip Deackes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> XFMail is tightly married to XForms. I would not expect this to >> change. > Darned ugly too. Enough to make you yearn for Windows!! This is a common disagreement for me. I just

Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread Phillip Deackes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 27 Nov 1999 18:16:47 +0100 > Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Has this already been ported to a better (and freer) toolkit than > > xforms, like GTK+ (or at least Qt)? > > XFMail is tightly married to XForms. I would not expect this to > change. Darn

Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread claw
On 27 Nov 1999 18:16:47 +0100 Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has this already been ported to a better (and freer) toolkit than > xforms, like GTK+ (or at least Qt)? XFMail is tightly married to XForms. I would not expect this to change. -- J C Lawrence

Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread claw
On Sat, 27 Nov 1999 17:07:28 +0100 Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In lists.linux.debian.user, you wrote: >> I am looking for something like MS Exchange with folder and such. > You could try xfmail, for example -- IIRC it supports folders. Most if not all MUA (Mail User Agens) s

Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread Remco van de Meent
In lists.linux.debian.user, you wrote: > I am looking for something like MS Exchange with folder > and such. You could try xfmail, for example -- IIRC it supports folders. Remco

Re: Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > Hi. Does anyone know of a good front end for email? > > I do not like elm, mutt or XEmacs. > > I am looking for something like MS Exchange with folder and such. You mean something like Outlook? I'm afraid that no such program exists

Mail front end

1999-11-27 Thread Timothy Bedding
Hi. Does anyone know of a good front end for email? I do not like elm, mutt or XEmacs. I am looking for something like MS Exchange with folder and such. Please email me off-list if you have any ideas. Thanks.