On Fri 13 Jul 2018 at 13:52:23 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> On Thu 12 Jul 2018 at 16:22:33 -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Wed 11 Jul 2018 at 16:34:48 (+), Curt wrote:
> > > On 2018-07-11, Brian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The interest being expressed is one in printing a PDF directly to a
> > > >
On Thu 12 Jul 2018 at 16:22:33 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 11 Jul 2018 at 16:34:48 (+), Curt wrote:
> > On 2018-07-11, Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > The interest being expressed is one in printing a PDF directly to a
> > > printer, so CUPS isn't (or needn't be) be involved. No conversion t
On Wed 11 Jul 2018 at 16:34:48 (+), Curt wrote:
> On 2018-07-11, Brian wrote:
> >
> > The interest being expressed is one in printing a PDF directly to a
> > printer, so CUPS isn't (or needn't be) be involved. No conversion to
> > or from PostScript (which is no longer being developed) is unde
On Wed 11 Jul 2018 at 16:34:48 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-07-11, Brian wrote:
> >
> > The interest being expressed is one in printing a PDF directly to a
> > printer, so CUPS isn't (or needn't be) be involved. No conversion to
> > or from PostScript (which is no longer being developed) is under
On 2018-07-11, Brian wrote:
>
> The interest being expressed is one in printing a PDF directly to a
> printer, so CUPS isn't (or needn't be) be involved. No conversion to
> or from PostScript (which is no longer being developed) is undertaken.
> Any delays would lie in transporting the file to the
On Wed 11 Jul 2018 at 22:03:57 +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 10.07.18 12:53, David Wright wrote:
> > On Mon 09 Jul 2018 at 19:05:52 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wr
> Yes. The all-in-ones are terrible at that, proprietary software or not.
FWIW, the XSane thingy worked fairly well for me with my last all-in-one
(using the HP driver bundled with Debian). It definitely worked much
better than with the crappy software they provided for Windows (I got
the impress
On 10.07.18 12:53, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Jul 2018 at 19:05:52 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > You're both missing the main point, which is that a Brother
On Tue 10 Jul 2018 at 12:53:20 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Jul 2018 at 19:05:52 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > You're both missing the main point, whi
On Tue 10 Jul 2018 at 14:20:50 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:53:20PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Mon 09 Jul 2018 at 19:05:52 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -040
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:53:20PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 09 Jul 2018 at 19:05:52 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > You're both missing the main point,
On Mon 09 Jul 2018 at 19:05:52 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > You're both missing the main point, which is that a Brother
> > > printer with BRscript/3 is essentially a
On Tuesday 10 July 2018 10:09:04 Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:38:41PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 07:05:52PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400,
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:38:41PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 07:05:52PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > > You're both missing the main poin
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 07:05:52PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> You're both missing the main point, which is that a Brother
> printer with BRscript/3 is essentially a Postscri
On 10/07/18 10:39, Dan Ritter wrote:
You're both missing the main point, which is that a Brother
printer with BRscript/3 is essentially a Postscript printer, and
you can treat it as one. No drivers needed.
And AFAIK models with BR-Script3 support also support PCL6, for which we
have great CUPS
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:53:44PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > You're both missing the main point, which is that a Brother
> > printer with BRscript/3 is essentially a Postscript printer, and
> > you can treat it as one. No drivers n
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:39:29PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
You're both missing the main point, which is that a Brother
printer with BRscript/3 is essentially a Postscript printer, and
you can treat it as one. No drivers needed.
So you can use it as an all-in-one postscript printer/scanner?
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 06:16:59PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > If you meant hplip drivers, which are available from Debian
> > repository, then I wonder what actually makes them so much "from
> > Debian"? IMHO, their avalability from Debian repository does not
> > really make them particular
> If you meant hplip drivers, which are available from Debian
> repository, then I wonder what actually makes them so much "from
> Debian"? IMHO, their avalability from Debian repository does not
> really make them particulary "Debian". They are still developed by HP
> or their development is
On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 11:14:53 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> I used to own MFC 7460DN. I own currently HL-L2389DW wireless -e
>> xcellent unit. Any of them work under Ubuntu, Debian (my current
>> distro), Fedora,
>> OpenSuse, etc. without a problem. Installation is a breeze. The
>> drivers ava
> Note that these settings use PCL6 emulation. Models that lack PCL6 support
> may need proprietary Brother CUPS drivers. When I checked, these were only
> available for i386. When I switched to the foomatic PCL6 driver, I was able
> to ditch the i386 drivers and my entire i386 arch support. This w
> I used to own MFC 7460DN. I own currently HL-L2389DW wireless -e xcellent
> unit. Any of them work under Ubuntu, Debian (my current distro), Fedora,
> OpenSuse, etc. without a problem. Installation is a breeze. The drivers
> available on Brother website.
Wait, does that mean the printer is no
I use and recommend the Brother MFC-L2740DW wireless multifunction
device (greyscale duplex laser and colour scanner). It works well for
both Linux and Mac clients. You might not be able to get this exact
model any more as it is over three years old. I suspect that the current
equivalent is the
On Sat, 07 Jul 2018 13:50:56 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I know there are probably multiple places where such ratings can be
> found. Not knowing which are reliable, I'm sort of asking for ratings of
> the ratings, I guess. Mostly, though, I want ratings of recent models,
> from a Linux/Debian
On 08/07/2018, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I know there are probably multiple places where such ratings can be found.
> Not knowing which are reliable, I'm sort of asking for ratings of the
> ratings, I guess. Mostly, though, I want ratings of recent models, from a
> Linux/Debian/Ubuntu perspective a
I know there are probably multiple places where such ratings can be found.
Not knowing which are reliable, I'm sort of asking for ratings of the
ratings, I guess. Mostly, though, I want ratings of recent models, from a
Linux/Debian/Ubuntu perspective as opposed to the usual Windows slant. I'm
pre
27 matches
Mail list logo
