Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"DSC" == DSC Siltec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DSC> *SIGH* That's exactly what I'm doing, "the debian way", except that I DSC> also run one additional step, "make BzImage" if I want a DSC> BzImage. The kernel-package default for i386 is BzImage, so you should not have to run tha

Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-30 Thread ben
On Thursday 30 May 2002 06:55 am, DSC Siltec wrote: [snip] > > *SIGH* That's exactly what I'm doing, "the debian way", except that I > also run one additional step, "make BzImage" if I want a BzImage. No > matter whether I use the kernel BzImage or VmLinuz, I get the error > mentioned at bugs.deb

Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-30 Thread DSC Siltec
Ivo Wever wrote: > > you wrote: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > I don't understand what you are talking about. I run Woody > > > and boot from Win98, using loadlin. > >[snip] > >but Loadlin can't understand it. > >This problem is documented in the bug reports. See > >bugs.debian.org/loadl

Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-29 Thread Kent West
DSC Siltec wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, it looks like Loadlin and Woody will not be compatible for some time [I hate to say not ever... but I wonder...] If that is the case, it is a shame, because I suspect there are a lot of users like me who want to keep Windows as their main boot

Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-29 Thread DSC Siltec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Well, it looks like Loadlin and Woody will not be > > compatible for some time [I hate to say not ever... but > > I wonder...] > > > > If that is the case, it is a shame, because I suspect > > there are a lot of users like me who want to keep Windows > > as their m

Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-29 Thread I . J . W . Wever
> Well, it looks like Loadlin and Woody will not be > compatible for some time [I hate to say not ever... but > I wonder...] > > If that is the case, it is a shame, because I suspect > there are a lot of users like me who want to keep Windows > as their main bootup option just in case they ha

Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-29 Thread Anthony Campbell
On 29 May 2002, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:07:18AM +0200, DSC Siltec wrote: > > Well, it looks like Loadlin and Woody will not be compatible for some > > time [I hate to say not ever... but I wonder...] > > Out of interest, what's the problem? (Did I miss a thread?) > > --

Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-29 Thread Keith Powell
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 10:07 am, DSC Siltec wrote: Snip > > But anyhow, since Loadlin won't work, I'd like to know about other > bootup options. > Mike. I don't have a hard drive inside my computer. Instead I have three hard drives each in a removeable tray (caddy). There is one slo

Re: Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:07:18AM +0200, DSC Siltec wrote: > Well, it looks like Loadlin and Woody will not be compatible for some > time [I hate to say not ever... but I wonder...] Out of interest, what's the problem? (Did I miss a thread?) -- Colin Watson [E

Loadlin alternatives

2002-05-29 Thread DSC Siltec
Well, it looks like Loadlin and Woody will not be compatible for some time [I hate to say not ever... but I wonder...] If that is the case, it is a shame, because I suspect there are a lot of users like me who want to keep Windows as their main bootup option just in case they have problems with