Re: Linux Standard Base

2003-11-06 Thread Bob Proulx
Paul E Condon wrote: > I've been talking to other Linux users in my area (Colorado, USA) > about their problems with Red Hat dropping their user, non-enterprise, > distribution. I suggest Debian. I say its really great. But I'm told > "But it doesn't comply wit

Re: Linux Standard Base

2003-11-06 Thread Ron Johnson
nge their manhood and geekitude, cause maybe they aren't tough enough to handle the command line. > So what is Linux Standard Base? And who does comply with it? And is http://www.linuxbase.org/index.php "The goal of the LSB is to develop and promote a set of standards that will increa

Re: Linux Standard Base

2003-11-06 Thread Chris Ochs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:33 PM Subject: Linux Standard Base > I've been talking to other Linux users in my area (Colorado, USA) > about their problems with Red Hat dropping their user, non-enterprise, > distribution

Re: Linux Standard Base

2003-11-05 Thread Greg Madden
ian. I say its really > great. But I'm told "But it doesn't comply with 'Linux Standard Base' > ". > > So what is Linux Standard Base? And who does comply with it? And is > this important to Debian? No flames please. If it is something that > was started b

Linux Standard Base

2003-11-05 Thread Paul E Condon
I've been talking to other Linux users in my area (Colorado, USA) about their problems with Red Hat dropping their user, non-enterprise, distribution. I suggest Debian. I say its really great. But I'm told "But it doesn't comply with 'Linux Standard Base' ".