>
> Alternatively, he's talking about Novell's eDirectory, which
> he says kicks the butt of any other directory service.
That is probably true, but if you want a high performace LDAP directory,
don't go with the Netware/eDirectory/LDAP solution. My experience of it is
that it works fine under lig
Stephen R Laniel napisał(a):
And I guess OpenLDAP has lots
of cool GUI admin tools for managing a number of machines at
once.
Alternatively, he's talking about Novell's eDirectory, which
he says kicks the butt of any other directory service.
The trouble with eDirectory and OpenLDAP, from my
per
I'm in a discussion with my boss about deploying LDAP or
something like it across my organization, which has around
200 people. He's advocating a Mac OpenLDAP server, because
he says it's a great amalgam of LDAP, Kerberos, and WinBIND.
And apparently Apple gives unlimited OpenLDAP site licenses
whe
3 matches
Mail list logo
