On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:54:43AM +0100, David Baron wrote:
> I still have no DRI. Daenzer packages are hard enough to compile. A friend
When people report glxgears framerates, are they reporting it with the
small window that comes up by default? Or when the window is maximised?
$ fglrxinfo
d
I still have no DRI. Daenzer packages are hard enough to compile. A friend
finally go it compiled for 2.4.22-xfs but it does not "catch". There are now
"binaries" around that ask a few questions and attempt the compile for you.
This does not mean it will procede nor does it mean the module will
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:25:31AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Johann Spies wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:07:40AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> >
> >
> >>"glxinfo | more"
> >>
> >>and then about the fourth line down to see if you have DRI enabled.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Thanks - also for the othe
Johann Spies wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:07:40AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
"glxinfo | more"
and then about the fourth line down to see if you have DRI enabled.
Thanks - also for the others for their answers.
A further question: I see that DRI is not enabled for me. How do I
enable
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:07:40AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
>
> "glxinfo | more"
>
> and then about the fourth line down to see if you have DRI enabled.
Thanks - also for the others for their answers.
A further question: I see that DRI is not enabled for me. How do I
enable it?
I have the f
Fredag den 5. marts 2004 15:20 skrev Mike Dresser:
> The other annoying thing is that XFree 4.3.0 takes about 35 seconds
> to start, compared to the 8 of 4.2.x
Your are not the only one that have got this slow start up of the
XFree86 on unstable. I see this too on my Intel Graphics Exteme
embed
Johann Spies wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote:
DRI | Knoppix Sid
yes |1330 800
no | 380 320
Sorry for showing my ignorance, but how do you measure this?
Regards
Johann
"glxinfo | more"
and then about the fourth line down to see i
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:24:11PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote:
> >
> > DRI | Knoppix Sid
> > yes |1330 800
> > no | 380 320
>
> Sorry for showing my ignorance, but how do you measure this?
You're not ignorant in
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 04:24:11PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote:
> >
> > DRI | Knoppix Sid
> > yes |1330 800
> > no | 380 320
>
> Sorry for showing my ignorance, but how do you measure this?
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Mike Dresser wrote:
> I'm sure I've done something wrong on both problems :)
Well, found the first problem.
Don't run setiathome while glxgears is running.
1800 fps now. Much more respectable.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote:
>
> DRI | Knoppix Sid
> yes |1330 800
> no | 380 320
Sorry for showing my ignorance, but how do you measure this?
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036
Informasietegnologie, Universiteit
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, [iso-8859-1] Pål Dahle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a Dell D600 laptop with a ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 M9 graphics
P4 2.53, Geforce4 MX 440(hey, i didn't want it, it was given to me at
work)
With DRI on Sid, i get around 175 fps.
Without DRI on Knoppix, i get around 350.
Bo
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:00:08AM +0100, Pål Dahle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a Dell D600 laptop with a ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 M9 graphics
> card.
Different laptop, but same graphics card here.
> Now, I am somewhat frustrated about the fact that Knoppix beats the shit
> out of sid when it
Hi all,
I've got a Dell D600 laptop with a ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 M9 graphics
card. I started out in october last year installing Knoppix 3.1 and
later 3.3 on it. At that time Knoppix was an appealing distribution,
since it came with XFree 4.3.0.
It wasn't what I eventually wanted, however, an
14 matches
Mail list logo
