Subject: Kernel 2.2.3 & Kernel Panic...
Date: Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 04:06:55PM -0400
In reply to:Brant Wells
Quoting Brant Wells([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Howdy All!
>
> I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a
> problem... After I run
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 03:45:15PM -0400, Brant Wells wrote:
> Howdy All...
>
> My Linux box is running on an ext2 partition.
>
> I use 'make install' , because it automatically makes the necessary changes
> for
> me, plus the fact that the last time I tried 'make zImage', it wiped out my
> Hard
On Mon, Apr 05, 1999 at 04:06:55PM -0400, Brant Wells wrote:
> Howdy All!
>
> I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a
> problem... After I run the 'make menuconfig' and then 'make clean; make
> dep; make install'... I then
Howdy All...
My Linux box is running on an ext2 partition.
I use 'make install' , because it automatically makes the necessary changes for
me, plus the fact that the last time I tried 'make zImage', it wiped out my
Hard Drive when I installed it.
I just went back and looked at the setup in 'menu
Howdy All!
I've been working with installing the Kernel 2.2.3, and I have a
problem... After I run the 'make menuconfig' and then 'make clean; make
dep; make install'... I then make a boot file for the NT Boot Manager...
When I get the NT Boot Manager to go to Linux, Eve
Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
>
> This is done by 'depmod -a'. In my system (slink) I have modutils package
I did that and received a bunch of strange messages for my effort. I
took a look at the Changes file that comes with the kernel sources. I a
have versions of some packages that are older than what
John Leget wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> "depmod -a"
>
> check out "man depmod"
>
> cheers
Thanks, I'll check that out.
--
__ _
Mark Wagnon Debian GNU/ -o) / / (_)__ __ __
Chula Vista, CA /\\/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 08:39:00PM +, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
>
> I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
> but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was
> empty. I took a look
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, John Leget wrote:
> Seems to work ok here, runnning potata SMP with kernel 2.2.3 also running the
> distributed-net client and top shows full utilisation, i was also using
> xosview but
> that seems to be broken with my current setup :(
You are right, I think i
Hi,
Seems to work ok here, runnning potata SMP with kernel 2.2.3 also running the
distributed-net client and top shows full utilisation, i was also using xosview
but
that seems to be broken with my current setup :(
Interestingly some months back when i went SMP top showed 200% for a while
Hi,
"depmod -a"
check out "man depmod"
cheers
Mark Wagnon wrote:
> I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
>
> I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
> but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was
> empty. I too
Has anyone here tried running an SMP system with kernel 2.2.3? If so, can
you get it to use both processors? For some reason, I can get it to
recognize two processors (this shows up in xproc), but top shows that at
most 50% of the CPU is getting used, i.e. only one of the processors. At
first I
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
>
> I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
> but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was
> empty. I took a look at /lib/modules/2
I have couple of questions about upgrading my kernel to 2.2.3.
I downloaded the full source and went through all the steps to compile,
but when I rebooted I received an error telling me that modules.dep was
empty. I took a look at /lib/modules/2.2.3/modules.dep and yep, it's
empty. I looked at the
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.3
Date: Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:01:13AM -0600
In reply to:steven walsh
Quoting steven walsh([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >
> > If you have 2.2.1 and successfully add the 2.2
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 09:20:04PM -0600, Faton Useni wrote:
> When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package
> from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that there where no
> patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian. I am wondering si
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Ed Cogburn wrote:
[snip]
>
> If you have 2.2.1 and successfully add the 2.2.2 and 2.2.3
> patches, then the end product *is* 2.2.3. Just tar it up yourself
> and name it as 2.2.3 tgz.
>
>
Details, details. >:)
"See you on the flip side"
- Steve Walsh (EfN
Yes, there are Linux 2.2x kernels in .deb format at
http://netgod.net/ Follow their 2.2.3 button in the upper
left hand corner of their home page. Version 2.2.3 is the
one you, now, immediately get to but the older 2.2.x
versions are in the archives.
At 3/10/99 08:20 PM , you wrote:
When i
steven walsh wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Is a lot faster to just apply the 2.2.2 & 2.2.3 patches. About 350 K
> > for the 2 or > 12M for 2.2.3 Kernel. Your choice.
> >
>
> On the other hand, i like having the full tgz around Just In
> Case.
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
[snip]
> Is a lot faster to just apply the 2.2.2 & 2.2.3 patches. About 350 K
> for the 2 or > 12M for 2.2.3 Kernel. Your choice.
>
On the other hand, i like having the full tgz around Just In
Case.
"See you on the flip side"
- Steve Walsh (E
Subject: Kernel 2.2.3
Date: Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 09:20:04PM -0600
In reply to:Faton Useni
Quoting Faton Useni([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package
> from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I rea
> When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source
> package from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that
> there where no patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian.
> I am wondering since i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i
> ca
When i updated slink from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 i got a kernel source package
from the debian ftp site. It was a debian package. I read that there where no
patches applied to the kernel source for use with debian. I am wondering since
i dont see a deb package for 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 if i can grab the 2
23 matches
Mail list logo
