On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 12:52:17PM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > If these Debian patches are so great, why aren't they in the official
> > > kernel source?
> > >
> >
> > Because the patches didn't exist when 2.2 was released. That is the
> > nature of
Well, OK.. I guess *somebody* has to patch the kernels, so it may as
well be the people who "sell" them, i.e. distribution "vendors" like
Debian and RedHat.. as long as the patches aren't forking the kernel
source tree, official or effective, I'm happy -
chris
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Shawn Yarbr
Krzys Majewski wrote:
>
> OK, so these are official kernel.org patches then? Or something else?
>
Here is the README.Debian file from kernel-source-2.2.18pre21:
(yes it looks like somebody forgot to update the title)
kernel-source-2.2.17 for DEBIAN
---
These patch
ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If these Debian patches are so great, why aren't they in the official
> > kernel source?
> >
>
> Because the patches didn't exist when 2.2 was released. That is the
> nature of a patch. For the most part patches are created to fix
> bugs that were unknown
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 08:53:46AM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Shawn Yarbrough wrote:
>
> > Use the 'kernel-source' packages and you will get extra features and
> > bugfixes patched in by Debian which are not in stock Linux. For example
> > 'kernel-source-2.2.18pre21'. Wh
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Shawn Yarbrough wrote:
> Use the 'kernel-source' packages and you will get extra features and
> bugfixes patched in by Debian which are not in stock Linux. For example
> 'kernel-source-2.2.18pre21'. When installed the archive gets put into
Is this anything like RedHat's cu
Krzys Majewski wrote:
>
> There is an official debian way to recompile kernels, but I don't
> bother.. download the kernel source from debian.org or kernel.org
Use the 'kernel-source' packages and you will get extra features and
bugfixes patched in by Debian which are not in stock Linux
There is an official debian way to recompile kernels, but I don't
bother.. download the kernel source from debian.org or kernel.org
(avoid minor versions which are not divisible by 2, like 2.1.* or
2.3.*) read the README in /usr/src/linux, and you're go. Basically
make menuconfig
ma
From: Mike Egglestone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm having a tough time finding info on how to
> edit the kernel so I can add "transparent_proxy" support.
> Isn't there some utility to do this?
You want to recompile the kernel with transparent_proxy?
If so, see http://www.chowells.uklinux.net/files
Hi all...
I'm having a tough time finding info on how to
edit the kernel so I can add "transparent_proxy" support.
Isn't there some utility to do this?
I'm running potato
If someone could help me out.. that would be great!!
Thanks
Mike
Thanks Martin, it is working now
Martin Fluch wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > I am trying to recompile the kernel according to KERNEL HOWTO, when I do
> > make menuconfig it complains that there is no rule. I checked the info
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> I am trying to recompile the kernel according to KERNEL HOWTO, when I do
> make menuconfig it complains that there is no rule. I checked the info
> make, it tells me that rule is a file that instructs about changes
I am trying to recompile the kernel according to KERNEL HOWTO, when I do
make menuconfig it complains that there is no rule. I checked the info
make, it tells me that rule is a file that instructs about changes to be
made. The same happens with xconfig. This is vague for me, I have not
any good und
Package: ncurses
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
I got the following lines when trying to make menu config.
How can I solve it ?
Aren't dependency problems supposed to be fixed automatically by dpkg ?
There seems to be a problem with the lxdialog companion utility which is
built prior to running
14 matches
Mail list logo
