would be upgraded, but nothing happend...
>>
>> You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE 3.1
>> in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
>
> What does that mean, "waiting on dependencies to work their way down?"
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Tom Verbreyt wrote:
>> Paul Johnson sagte:
>> > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
>> > 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier wa
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:31:03PM +0330, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> > For the umpteenth time, yes, I'm sure. This is really happening.
> > Damn, folks, you bitch about how slow things take to update, then you
> > don't believe it when it happens.
>
> I admit that's right ;-)
>
> maybe it's because we
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:18:55AM -0600, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> Is there an automated process at work, or do you mean waiting on bug
> reports from people who find things missing?
Neither. It takes a while, especially when the developers have lives,
to compile and package the world.
--
.''`
On Friday 07 February 2003 14:08, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:52:49PM +0330, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> > Are you sure they are putting 3.1 in sid? I use 3.1 RC5 right now, and
> > would like to upgrade to sid, instead of just upgrading to KDE 3.1 final,
> > if they are gonna put 3.1
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:18:55AM -0600, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:39:16AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE 3.1
> > in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
>
>
der switching back, as they really are putting KDE 3.1
> in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
What does that mean, "waiting on dependencies to work their way down?"
Is there an automated process at work, or do you mean waiting on bug
reports from people who f
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:52:49PM +0330, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2003 13:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > I just happened to look at incoming.debian.org that day and saw random
> > kde 3.1 packages filtering in.
>
> From what I can see, it is just KDE 3.1's language packs. I don't s
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:52:49PM +0330, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> Are you sure they are putting 3.1 in sid? I use 3.1 RC5 right now, and would
> like to upgrade to sid, instead of just upgrading to KDE 3.1 final, if they
> are gonna put 3.1 in sid in the next one or two weeks.
http://packages.debia
On Friday 07 February 2003 13:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Tom Verbreyt wrote:
> > > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> > > 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
> >
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Tom Verbreyt wrote:
> Paul Johnson sagte:
> > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> > 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
>
> Now how do you people know that so fast and
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Tom Verbreyt wrote:
> > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> > 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
>
> Now how do you people know that so fast and so sure? I seem
> to al
Paul Johnson sagte:
> You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
Now how do you people know that so fast and so sure? I seem
to always be the latest to get to know such "important"
Paul Johnson sagte:
> You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
Now how do you people know that so fast and so sure? I seem
to always be the latest to get to know such "important"
fine for me.
>
> deb ftp://download.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/latest/Debian stable main
You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE 3.1
in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 07 February 2003 03:30, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> kde: Depends: libarts or
> libarts-alsa but it is not
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:30:31PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Btw, is kde3.1 already in sid? I thought when I did my upgrade kde
> would be upgraded, but nothing happend...
Give it time for the dependancies to work out.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 06 February 2003 05:17, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:45:54AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > KDE starts drifting into sid! .debs at 11:00 (-0100).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 February 2003 05:17, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:45:54AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > KDE starts drifting into sid! .debs at 11:00 (-0100). There's some
> > kde related debs on incoming.debian.org that should be
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:45:54AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> KDE starts drifting into sid! .debs at 11:00 (-0100). There's some
> kde related debs on incoming.debian.org that should be in tonight's
> update.
Before I upgrade my system, does anyone experience some fallbacks?
Upgrading that do
KDE starts drifting into sid! .debs at 11:00 (-0100). There's some
kde related debs on incoming.debian.org that should be in tonight's
update.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a sys
21 matches
Mail list logo
