Re: KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1)

1999-02-11 Thread Peter Weiss
> On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 05:01:26 +, Mark Wagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Mark> "Gregory T. Norris" wrote: >> >> Looks like I was a tad hasty toward the end there... It seems that the >> "-1" revision of the two kdesupport*.deb packages are ok. I see that >> they've now removed all of the

Re: KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1)

1999-02-11 Thread Mark Wagnon
"Gregory T. Norris" wrote: > > Looks like I was a tad hasty toward the end there... It seems that the > "-1" revision of the two kdesupport*.deb packages are ok. I see that > they've now removed all of the other (bad) "-1" packages, as well. > Looks like it should all be fixed! I'm grabbing them

Re: KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1)

1999-02-11 Thread Gregory T. Norris
Looks like I was a tad hasty toward the end there... It seems that the "-1" revision of the two kdesupport*.deb packages are ok. I see that they've now removed all of the other (bad) "-1" packages, as well. Looks like it should all be fixed! On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 04:45:57PM -0600, Gregory T. No

Re: KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1)

1999-02-10 Thread Gregory T. Norris
t 12:59:18PM +0100, Mathieu Legrand wrote: > Hello, > > I downloaded yesterday KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1) from ftp.kde.org. The .deb > files seems to be corrupted: dpkg tells that into the deb file, there is an > invalid ZIP file and it can't decompress. I tried to redownload the fil

KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1)

1999-02-10 Thread Mathieu Legrand
Hello, I downloaded yesterday KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1) from ftp.kde.org. The .deb files seems to be corrupted: dpkg tells that into the deb file, there is an invalid ZIP file and it can't decompress. I tried to redownload the files from a second computer on a different network, and this is the