Re: Interfaces configuration and tap0

2002-11-04 Thread Philippe Raxhon
Hi Philippe! On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Philippe Raxhon wrote: Thanks a lot (I had forgoten that line) but I still have tap0 on startup, but not in single mode, so it's probably a daemon that is setting it. The real problem is that tap0 is set has the default route, and I still have to do; if

Re: Interfaces configuration and tap0

2002-03-14 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Philippe! On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Philippe Raxhon wrote: > Thanks a lot (I had forgoten that line) but I still have tap0 on > startup, but not in single mode, so it's probably a daemon that is > setting it. The real problem is that tap0 is set has the default route, > and I still have to do; >

Re: Interfaces configuration and tap0

2002-03-13 Thread Philippe Raxhon
Subject: Re: Interfaces configuration and tap0 From: Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:27:58 +0100 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Hi Philippe! On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Philippe

Re: Interfaces configuration and tap0

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Wuertele
Hi Philippe! On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Philippe Raxhon wrote: > I'm running a Debian 2.2 with testing packages. I have 2 network cards: > - eth0: not configured, it's used by pppd (ADSL line) when started. > - eth1: configured as 192.168.1.254, for my local network (configured > using linuxconf, pres

Interfaces configuration and tap0

2002-03-12 Thread Philippe Raxhon
Hi, I'm running a Debian 2.2 with testing packages. I have 2 network cards: - eth0: not configured, it's used by pppd (ADSL line) when started. - eth1: configured as 192.168.1.254, for my local network (configured using linuxconf, present in /etc/network/interfaces) But when I boot, ifconfig