On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 11:05:26AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote in Article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
> gmane.linux.debian.user:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:08:39PM -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
> >> I saw this on usenet and wonder about the validity of this stat
Andrew Sackville-West wrote in Article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:08:39PM -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
>> I saw this on usenet and wonder about the validity of this statement.
>>
>> 'Seriously any system is as secure as the services you expor
Mike McClain wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to gmane.linux.debian.user:
> I saw this on usenet and wonder about the validity of this statement.
>
> 'Seriously any system is as secure as the services you export, if you
> have nothing listening that can do you harm you are secure...'
>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 11:08:39PM -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
> I saw this on usenet and wonder about the validity of this statement.
>
> 'Seriously any system is as secure as the services you export, if you
> have nothing listening that can do you harm you are secure...'
>
> Disregarding email e
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 23:08:39 -0700, Mike McClain wrote:
>I saw this on usenet and wonder about the validity of this statement.
>
>'Seriously any system is as secure as the services you export, if you
>have nothing listening that can do you harm you are secure...'
>
>Disregarding email exploits
I saw this on usenet and wonder about the validity of this statement.
'Seriously any system is as secure as the services you export, if you
have nothing listening that can do you harm you are secure...'
Disregarding email exploits and exploits through your browser is this
true? Assume the hardwa
6 matches
Mail list logo