On 2022-11-15, mick.crane wrote:
> On 2022-11-15 14:03, Curt wrote:
> I recommend a reboot at this point to remove the currently running
>> network and to ensure that your network comes up properly.
>>
>> This is all it takes for a simple case.
>>
>> Good luck.
>
> I used to look how long upti
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 02:21:01PM +, mick.crane wrote:
> On 2022-11-15 14:03, Curt wrote:
> I recommend a reboot at this point to remove the currently running
> > network and to ensure that your network comes up properly.
> >
> > This is all it takes for a simple case.
> >
> > Good luck.
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 02:03:19PM -, Curt wrote:
> [...] (whether this is a somehow invalidating reminder of
> Microsoft Windows is left as the traditional exercise):
I know that smugness. I'm old, after all :-)
That said, as age accrues, I've learnt an upside of rebooting after
sweeping co
On 2022-11-15 14:03, Curt wrote:
I recommend a reboot at this point to remove the currently running
network and to ensure that your network comes up properly.
This is all it takes for a simple case.
Good luck.
I used to look how long uptime was but now I reboot in case I broke
something th
On 2022-11-14, jeremy ardley wrote:
>
> On 15/11/22 00:22, Curt wrote:
>> On 2022-11-14, jeremy ardley wrote:
>>>
>>> Network Manager is terrible. Some of the instructions include you having
>>> to reboot your system to make chages take.
>> What "instructions" would those be, and of what provenan
On Tue 15 Nov 2022 at 05:17:33 (+0800), jeremy ardley wrote:
> On 15/11/22 00:22, Curt wrote:
> > On 2022-11-14, jeremy ardley wrote:
> > >
> > > Network Manager is terrible. Some of the instructions include you having
> > > to reboot your system to make chages take.
> > What "instructions" would
On 14/11/22 22:34, hw wrote:
[...]
However, systemd-networkd works as well (and better) with
an easier configuration.
Hm, then why isn't it the default, and what's network manager for?
NetworkManager seems to be a RedHat baby and has some effort put into a
GUI. systemd-networkd has not go
On 15/11/22 00:22, Curt wrote:
On 2022-11-14, jeremy ardley wrote:
Network Manager is terrible. Some of the instructions include you having
to reboot your system to make chages take.
What "instructions" would those be, and of what provenance, that require a
system reboot rather than a resta
On 2022-11-14, jeremy ardley wrote:
>
>
> Network Manager is terrible. Some of the instructions include you having
> to reboot your system to make chages take.
What "instructions" would those be, and of what provenance, that require a
system reboot rather than a restart of networking to make cha
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 19:23 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
>
> On 14/11/22 19:14, hw wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 07:50 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
> > >
> > > I decided to use systemd-networkd service and removed most of the stuff
> > > from /etc/network/interfaces
> > > [...]
> > Thanks! I co
On 14/11/22 19:14, hw wrote:
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 07:50 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
I decided to use systemd-networkd service and removed most of the stuff
from /etc/network/interfaces
[...]
Thanks! I considered installing network manager, but the Debian wiki gave me
the impression that it
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 07:50 +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
>
>
> On 14/11/2022 12:07 am, hw wrote:
> > > Hi, > > the subject says it ... I have an interface that is being
> configured > with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses via dhcp. I need to assign an
> > addi
On Sun, 2022-11-13 at 19:49 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> On 13/11/2022 16:07, hw wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the subject says it ... I have an interface that is being configured with
> > IPv4
> > and IPv6 addresses via dhcp. I need to assign an additional I
On 14/11/2022 7:50 am, jeremy ardley wrote:
> How do I additionally assign fd53::40/16?
I faced exactly the same problem on a recent new install of Debian 11.
I decided to use systemd-networkd service and removed most of the
stuff from /etc/network/interfaces
This is my /etc/systemd/network
On 14/11/2022 12:07 am, hw wrote:
> Hi, > > the subject says it ... I have an interface that is being
configured > with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses via dhcp. I need to assign an
> additional IPv6 address to the interface. > > > > How do I
additionally assign fd53::
On 13/11/2022 16:07, hw wrote:
Hi,
the subject says it ... I have an interface that is being configured with IPv4
and IPv6 addresses via dhcp. I need to assign an additional IPv6 address to the
interface.
This is all very easy with network-manager but that seems to be kinda deprecated
and
Hi,
the subject says it ... I have an interface that is being configured with IPv4
and IPv6 addresses via dhcp. I need to assign an additional IPv6 address to the
interface.
This is all very easy with network-manager but that seems to be kinda deprecated
and we're supposed to us
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:41:21 -0600
John Hasler wrote:
> This may be what you have:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#IPv4-mapped_IPv6_addresses
Thank you. As per my other mail, it turns out that it's apparently this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_transition_mechanisms#NAT64
https://en.w
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:27:51 +0300
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 04:54:17PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > But the IPv6 address e:f:g:h:i:j:k:l is not actually configured
> > anywhere on the router (as shown by 'ip a' and other tools)!
>
> Either there's some IPv6 - IPv4 conver
This may be what you have:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#IPv4-mapped_IPv6_addresses
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
at you're given a /64 block of IPv6
addresses (whenever it's DHCPv6, RA or static configuration).
But you can clear things out easily.
Can you establish an outbound connection from the router via IPv6?
Something like this should do it:
curl https://ipv6.google.com
Reco
Hi,
[Somewhat off-topic, since this is a general networking topic:]
I have Verizon Fios residential internet service. Verizon is
notoriously cagey about its deployment of IPv6 for residential service
[1], but I don't seem to officially have it - my router (running
OpenWrt) tries dhcp6 but fails t
Le 08/02/2019 à 04:00, Richard Hector a écrit :
However, it's starting to look like the router actually does
advertise the ULA as well (I thought it didn't)
AFAIK, a router does not advertise a prefix by itself, if it has not
been configured to do so.
It just appears that the idea of using
On 8/02/19 8:30 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> Huh ? Isn't it the autoconfigured address you expect to get from an "auto"
>> stanza ?
> I bet there's at least a little confusion between
>
> auto ens3
>
> and
>
> iface ens3 inet6 auto
>
> the first one tells the system to bring ens3 up at boot time;
>
On 8/02/19 8:08 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 07/02/2019 à 10:15, Richard Hector a écrit :
>>>
>>> # this one should hopefully configure via SLAAC
>>> iface ens3 inet6 auto
>>>
>>> # this one is for my static stuff (using a ULA prefix)
>>> iface ens3 inet6 static
>>> address 2001:db8::1/64
>>>
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 07/02/2019 à 10:15, Richard Hector a écrit :
> > >
> > > # this one should hopefully configure via SLAAC
> > > iface ens3 inet6 auto
> > >
> > > # this one is for my static stuff (using a ULA prefix)
> > > iface ens3 inet6 static
> > >address 2001:db8::1/64
> > >
Le 07/02/2019 à 10:15, Richard Hector a écrit :
# this one should hopefully configure via SLAAC
iface ens3 inet6 auto
# this one is for my static stuff (using a ULA prefix)
iface ens3 inet6 static
address 2001:db8::1/64
up ip -6 route add ...
up ip -6 route add ...
up ip -6 route ad
On 7/02/19 10:05 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Tipped off by a comment on here, and confirmed I think by reading the
> manpage, it seems I should be able to set multiple addresses on an
> interface by using multiple iface stanzas for the same interface in
> /etc/network/interfaces.
>
>
Hi all,
Tipped off by a comment on here, and confirmed I think by reading the
manpage, it seems I should be able to set multiple addresses on an
interface by using multiple iface stanzas for the same interface in
/etc/network/interfaces.
So I have something like this:
iface ens3 inet static
Hello,
I made the following tests on ETCH and SID with the same result. I
tested on COMPAQ Deskpro EN and VMware machines (the captures below are
taken from the VMware machine) .
RFC4193 defines fc00::/8 and fd00::/8 IPv6 addresses known as "Local
IPv6 addresses" and stated that
Can anybody confirm that this is not possible ? if so, I'll submit a feature
request.
On Thursday 26 October 2006 23:40, Pupeno wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to configure multiple IPv6 addresses on the same interface of a
> Debian box. I need the configuration that would have the same
Hello,
I need to configure multiple IPv6 addresses on the same interface of a Debian
box. I need the configuration that would have the same effect as `ip addr add
IP dev eth0`.
I tried adding another device, eth0:0, but that caused problems: two devices
with the same MAC address turns into two
The following line (executed by the dhclient script on my machine)
ifconfig eth0 inet 152.81.2.43 netmask 255.255.240.0 broadcast 152.81.15.255
creates IPv6 addresses (starting with 2001: and 2002:), given by
"ifconfig eth0". The problem is that these addresses do not work
(well, at
33 matches
Mail list logo
