-Mensaje original-
De: Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Javier Sieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Debian User
Fecha: Sábado, 16 de Diciembre de 2000 10:35 a.m.
Asunto: Re: I'm Confused with SBLive!
>Hi, Javier!
>
>In my /etc/modules.conf i have two lines (
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Javier Sieben wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I tried to install the emu10k1 module from ALSA. Having any troubles with
> it, I deinstalled it. When I read that the final kernel (version 2.2.17)
> had these module in it, I download, compile and install it with the modules.
> But I can't use
Well, one way I guess the creative drivers could be different is that fact that
there are always daily builds at opensource.creative.com, so if there are any
recent changes, they would be there first.
-Rob
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:11:41AM -0500, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
> > "stef" == stef wr
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:40:46PM -0500, S . Salman Ahmed wrote:
> > "RV" == Rob VanFleet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RV> AFAIK, it's exactly the same.
I'm not sure of that. With kernel 2.2.17, I had version 0.6 and with the
driver from creative, it is version 0.12. What's more, the s
> Is there any difference b/w the SB Live! driver available from
> opensource.creative.com and the one that is already in the current 2.2.x
> kernel ?
AFAIK, it's exactly the same. The problem is that the stock 2.2.17 kernel
included with potato doesn't have it; why, I don't know. Rather than re
-Mensaje original-
De: Robert Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Javier Sieben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Debian User
Fecha: Jueves, 14 de Diciembre de 2000 05:30 p.m.
Asunto: Re: I'm Confused with SBLive!
>I was able to download 2.2.17 kernel sources, where the emu10k1
-Mensaje original-
De: Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Fecha: Jueves, 14 de Diciembre de 2000 08:01 a.m.
Asunto: Re: I'm Confused with SBLive!
>I got the same card working. But I took the sources from, I think
>www.alsa-project.o
I was successful just downloading the oss emu10k1 source from
http://opensource.creative.com. As long as you have kernel-headers-2.2.17
installed, you just have to compile the module and it will work with the stock
2.2.17 potato kernel.
Just compile the module, make install, add 'alias sound emu1
>I tried to install the emu10k1 module from ALSA. Having any troubles with
>it, I deinstalled it. When I read that the final kernel (version 2.2.17)
>had these module in it, I download, compile and install it with the modules.
>But I can't use audio.
There is a debian package for kernel 2.2.18p
I was able to download 2.2.17 kernel sources, where the emu10k1 module was
present. I used kernel-package to compile my kernel (with emu10k1 module, no
other sound modules were needed). I use dpkg -i on my custom kernel .deb
pacakge and then ran modconf. Worked fine for me, though you only g
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:04:11PM -0300, Javier Sieben wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I tried to install the emu10k1 module from ALSA. Having any troubles with
> it, I deinstalled it. When I read that the final kernel (version 2.2.17)
> had these module in it, I download, compile and install it with the module
Hi!
I tried to install the emu10k1 module from ALSA. Having any troubles with
it, I deinstalled it. When I read that the final kernel (version 2.2.17)
had these module in it, I download, compile and install it with the modules.
But I can't use audio.
The kernel starts and don't install the module
12 matches
Mail list logo
