On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 02:34:55PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
[...]
> My version of mutt (1.5.17+20080114-1+b1) is newer than yours, so maybe
> this behavior was changed recently or the older manpage is less
> explicitly clear about it.
No, it's the same, I just didn't read so far. As Kevin a
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:12:17 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
[...]
> > If you do not explicitly "subscribe" (in ~/.muttrc) to a mailing list
> > then mutt will generate Mail-Followup-To headers for the list address
> > and for you
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 21:43:58 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:00:25PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >
> > > > > |___ Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed ___|
> > > >
> > > > Your Mai
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 21:43:58 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:00:25PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >
> > > > > |___ Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed ___|
> > > >
> > > > Your Mai
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 21:43:58 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:00:25PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> > > > |___ Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed ___|
> > >
> > > Your Mail-Followup-To header indicates that you want to be CC'ed. Is
> > > that tru
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:00:25PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > |___ Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed ___|
> >
> > Your Mail-Followup-To header indicates that you want to be CC'ed. Is
> > that true? [Sending this to you, but with M-F-T to the list.]
> >
> > Sven
> Hi
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 08:26:51AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-04-25 04:28 +0200, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> > and there is a tool to verify that there are not missing files from your
> > installed DEB files (i think its 'debverify'?? if anyone know, do tell)
>
> It's called `debsums', actual
Berni Elbourn wrote:
A good system in my world has the absolute minimum of files to do the
job properly. For a start there is by definition going to be less
potential for security holes...anyhooo try this:
# tasksel
Berni
Berni,
I like. That goes back a ways. That should do it
On 04/24/2008 07:29 PM, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Mumia W.. wrote the following on 04/24/2008 12:06 PM:
On 04/24/2008 11:40 AM, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
[...]
I don't know if I have a system that qualifies as a "good" system
right now! :-(
What do you mean when you say they don't have a "full"
Mumia W.. wrote:
On 04/24/2008 11:40 AM, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
[...]
I don't know if I have a system that qualifies as a "good" system
right now! :-(
What do you mean when you say they don't have a "full" set of packages?
How do you know that packages are missing?
How do you know which
On 2008-04-25 04:28 +0200, Kevin Mark wrote:
> and there is a tool to verify that there are not missing files from your
> installed DEB files (i think its 'debverify'?? if anyone know, do tell)
It's called `debsums', actually.
> |___ Unless I ask to be CCd, assume I am subscribed ___|
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:26:13AM -0500, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> I have four Debian systems and a couple of them seem to have gotten in
> the state that they don't have a full set of packages for some reason.
>
> Is there any way to do a refresh or reinstall of the system to make
Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
> >
> > I have four Debian systems and a couple of them seem to have gotten in
> > the state that they don't have a full set of packages for some reason.
> >
> > Is there any way to do a refresh or reinstall of the system to make
> >
Mumia W.. wrote the following on 04/24/2008 12:06 PM:
On 04/24/2008 11:40 AM, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
[...]
I don't know if I have a system that qualifies as a "good" system
right now! :-(
What do you mean when you say they don't have a "full" set of packages?
Things don't act the same on
On 04/24/2008 11:40 AM, Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
[...]
I don't know if I have a system that qualifies as a
"good" system right now! :-(
What do you mean when you say they don't have a "full" set of packages?
How do you know that packages are missing?
How do you know which packages are missi
Damon L. Chesser wrote the following on 04/24/2008
08:09 AM:
Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
I have four Debian systems and a couple of them seem to have gotten in
the state that they don't have a full set of packages for some reason.
Is there any way to do a refresh or reinstall of the sy
Dennis G. Wicks wrote:
Greetings;
I have four Debian systems and a couple of them seem to have gotten in
the state that they don't have a full set of packages for some reason.
Is there any way to do a refresh or reinstall of the system to make
sure everything is there? Short of an install fr
Greetings;
I have four Debian systems and a couple of them seem to
have gotten in the state that they don't have a full
set of packages for some reason.
Is there any way to do a refresh or reinstall of the
system to make sure everything is there? Short of an
install from the beginning that
18 matches
Mail list logo
