Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-07 Thread Pigeon
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 04:54:06PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote: > * Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021206 13:35]: > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:12:35AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote: > > > try > > > > > > ldd -v /path/to/executable > > > > > > To see what it's looking for and where. Then you can use > >

Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-06 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021206 13:35]: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:12:35AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote: > > try > > > > ldd -v /path/to/executable > > > > To see what it's looking for and where. Then you can use > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH to override its search path with a righteous one. > > Hey,

Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-06 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:12:35AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote: > try > > ldd -v /path/to/executable > > To see what it's looking for and where. Then you can use > LD_LIBRARY_PATH to override its search path with a righteous one. Hey, that is one neat command. Very useful to know that! OK. The o

Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-05 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Pigeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021205 08:00]: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:46:58AM +1100, John Griffiths wrote: > > Phoenix > Not so. It moans that it can't find a file - the C shared library, > which is sitting there in /usr/lib where it should be, and I think I'd > know if it was missing. It does

Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-05 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:46:58AM +1100, John Griffiths wrote: > Phoenix > > it's light, it's fast, it's *just* a browser, its moz/gecko based. > > only at 0.4 but even here in windows land it's what we've waited these long > years for Thanks. I downloaded it, and followed the installation inst

Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-03 Thread John Griffiths
Phoenix it's light, it's fast, it's *just* a browser, its moz/gecko based. only at 0.4 but even here in windows land it's what we've waited these long years for t 08:08 PM 12/3/02 +, Pigeon wrote: >On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:59:11AM -0500, Travis Crump wrote: >> Oki DZ wrote: >> > On Sun, De

Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-03 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:59:11AM -0500, Travis Crump wrote: > Oki DZ wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 03:24:11AM +, Pigeon wrote: > > > >>But I've got this infuriating circular problem. It wants to link with > >>the libraries libjs.a and libjsj.a. What source package are these provided > >

Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-02 Thread Travis Crump
Oki DZ wrote: On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 03:24:11AM +, Pigeon wrote: But I've got this infuriating circular problem. It wants to link with the libraries libjs.a and libjsj.a. What source package are these provided by? Mozilla. Can I figure out how to get it to build them before it wants to link

Re: Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-12-02 Thread Oki DZ
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 03:24:11AM +, Pigeon wrote: > But I've got this infuriating circular problem. It wants to link with > the libraries libjs.a and libjsj.a. What source package are these provided > by? Mozilla. Can I figure out how to get it to build them before it > wants to link with the

Help configuring old mozilla compile

2002-11-30 Thread Pigeon
Hi, I am trying to compile the slink version of mozilla, because the binary .deb version I have installed has several peculiar bugs: eg when you type an address into the URL bar, you can't make it go to that site, it just ignores it; also, an error dialog "Actions not found: BtnUp, BtnDown" keeps