On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 10:47:15AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> terryc wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Now, if you really want low cost per page, mono, look at a good dot
>
> Did you really mean to use that word? I dunno what language you
> intended, but in slangy Spanish "'mano" is short for "hermano",
>
terryc wrote:
[snip]
Now, if you really want low cost per page, mono, look at a good dot
Did you really mean to use that word? I dunno what language you
intended, but in slangy Spanish "'mano" is short for "hermano",
or brother. But "mono" is pejorative.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,3
On 31 Jul, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [snip]
>
> Sorry for joining this OT thread.
>
> Don't get misled by the subject; this has nothing to do with
> mathematics:
>
> 1) stddev's only apply, if temperatures would vary statistically and
> wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/31/07 11:08, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> [snip]
>>> Because people (even, apparently, smart people like you) seem to fixate on
>>> that "average" number and think that "because that's the average, that's
>>> what the temperature is supposed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/07 12:25, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:40:11AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 07/11/07 18:44, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:31:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/10/07 22:21, R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[snip]
>> Because people (even, apparently, smart people like you) seem to fixate on
>> that "average" number and think that "because that's the average, that's
>> what the temperature is supposed to be", weather sites should *not* post
>> average,
On Jul 11, 2007, at 4:24 AM, ispmarin wrote:
Is there a range in laser toner's price?
Yes, it varies widely from printer to printer, and depending on
whether the cartridge is all-new or recycled. Toner cartridges range
from $45 to over $200.
I usually find recycled cartridges pretty rel
On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/10/07 22:07, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Oddly enough, this moisture problem has even cause people to develop
specific units whose only purpose is to remove moisture from the air.
They are called dehumidifiers.
Why remove the humidity and l
On Jul 10, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:22:09PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
You don't find that the toner cakes and settles? I've had that in
humid
weather. It required lots of shaking and I still didn't get the spec
number of pages out of th
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:40:11AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 07/11/07 18:44, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:31:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> On 07/10/07 22:21, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I thought you established that it doesn't get hot in Canada.
>> Well,
On 07/11/07 18:44, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:31:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/10/07 22:21, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I thought you established that it doesn't get hot in Canada.
Well, I'm almost in canada and it's 104F (40C) here today with 106F (41C)
t
> Isn't it the Texans that love 40C weather
> and say "Oh, but its a _dry_ heat" ?
Doug
That's the mantra of the cactus-leagers :-)
I am a Texan transplanted to Arizona
a little over 25 years ago
--
Stanley C. Kitching
Human Being
Phoenix, Arizona
== Posted
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:31:29PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 07/10/07 22:21, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> I thought you established that it doesn't get hot in Canada.
Well, I'm almost in canada and it's 104F (40C) here today with 106F (41C)
tomorrow
and saturday. But, as was already said, a
Sooo...
If I live in a very wet and hot weather in half of the year, and a
very dry and somewhat cold weather in the other half, like São
Carlos, Brasil, there is no printer for me? ;-)
Inkjets are cheap to buy here, but original replacement cartridges are
very expensive. Third parties cartrigdes
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:36:43PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:15:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > >Oddly enough, this moisture problem has even cause people to develop
> > >specific units whose only purpose is to remove moisture from the air.
> > >They are c
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:15:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >Oddly enough, this moisture problem has even cause people to develop
> >specific units whose only purpose is to remove moisture from the air.
> >They are called dehumidifiers.
>
> Why remove the humidity and leave the heat? Doesn't
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:59:25PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Well, no, because here in the US we have air conditioners. I
> understand that up in the Great White North it rarely gets above 10C
> and so you've only heard rumors of such things, but they do a great
> job of, among other thi
On 07/10/07 22:21, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:15:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/10/07 22:07, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:59:25PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Well, no, because here in the US we have air conditioners. I
understand that up
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:15:49PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 07/10/07 22:07, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:59:25PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >>Well, no, because here in the US we have air conditioners. I
> >>understand that up in the Great White North it rare
On 07/10/07 22:07, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:59:25PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Well, no, because here in the US we have air conditioners. I
understand that up in the Great White North it rarely gets above 10C
and so you've only heard rumors of such things, but they
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:59:25PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Well, no, because here in the US we have air conditioners. I
> understand that up in the Great White North it rarely gets above 10C
> and so you've only heard rumors of such things, but they do a great
> job of, among other th
On 07/10/07 20:22, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 03:57:31PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
That's why I went for an inexpensive color laser printer. It cost
US$350, but there's no ink to dry up and nozzles to clog.
You don't find that the toner cakes and settles? I've had
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:22:09PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 03:57:31PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > That's why I went for an inexpensive color laser printer. It cost
> > US$350, but there's no ink to dry up and nozzles to clog.
> >
>
> You don't find that
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 03:57:31PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> That's why I went for an inexpensive color laser printer. It cost
> US$350, but there's no ink to dry up and nozzles to clog.
>
You don't find that the toner cakes and settles? I've had that in humid
weather. It required lots of
On 07/10/07 13:06, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Jul 9, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
If you're looking for an inexpensive printer you can pick up tomorrow
at your local
Staples, some of the most recent HP's are surprisingly cheap to run.
The new $99 C4280 (an All-in-One, so also a sc
On Jul 10, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Mike McCarty wrote:
Hmm. I have s DeskJet 895C which has been sitting up for over a year
with cartridges in it. I plugged it in, started it up, and it prints
just fine. It had a couple of clogged nozzles, but after printing
three test pages, they cleared up.
That'
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Jul 9, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
If you're looking for an inexpensive printer you can pick up tomorrow
at your local
Staples, some of the most recent HP's are surprisingly cheap to run.
The new $99 C4280 (an All-in-One, so also a scanner) takes a $3
On Jul 9, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Andrew Malcolmson wrote:
If you're looking for an inexpensive printer you can pick up
tomorrow at your local
Staples, some of the most recent HP's are surprisingly cheap to run.
The new $99 C4280 (an All-in-One, so also a scanner) takes a $30
add on large
black
On Jul 9, 2007, at 8:12 PM, terryc wrote:
If you want a cheap cents per page laser, then you really need to
go back to something based on the Canon SX engine, like a HP
Laserjet II, Gestetner, etc, etc. with so many machine using the
same toner cartridge, the cost of tower per page was the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ispmarin wrote:
> I am looking for a printer with very low per page cost (catridges,
> tonners etc) and not very expensive to buy. I dont care if it is laser
> or deskjet. Performance is not a issue (it can be slow), and the
> quality of the page dont
Agreed, dot matrix is probably cheaper than ink cartidges, depends on
your area probably though. I just wanted to add that if you try hard
enough you can get a printer 2nd hand (maybe for free) so just look
for cheap inks/ribbons.
Printers: avoid newer printers where the inks have a lot of
electr
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 05:36:09PM -, ispmarin wrote:
> Hello all at Debian User.
>
> I am looking for a printer with very low per page cost (catridges,
> tonners etc) and not very expensive to buy. I dont care if it is laser
> or deskjet. Performance is not a issue (it can be slow), and the
>
Your cost per page really depends on how many pages, in total you are going to
print.
Inkjets are relatively expensive per page, unless you get yumcha ink at exceedingly good prices. ever noticed how you can buy a inkjet printer for less that the costof the refills?
If you want a cheap cents
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 05:36:09PM -, ispmarin wrote:
> Hello all at Debian User.
>
> I am looking for a printer with very low per page cost (catridges,
> tonners etc) and not very expensive to buy. I dont care if it is laser
> or deskjet. Performance is not a issue (it can be slow), and the
>
ispmarin wrote:
Hello all at Debian User.
I am looking for a printer with very low per page cost (catridges,
tonners etc) and not very expensive to buy. I dont care if it is laser
or deskjet. Performance is not a issue (it can be slow), and the
quality of the page dont need to be high (I will pr
On 07/09/07 12:59, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 05:36:09PM -, ispmarin wrote:
Hello all at Debian User.
I am looking for a printer with very low per page cost (catridges,
tonners etc) and not very expensive to buy. I dont care if it is laser
or deskjet. Performance is n
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 05:36:09PM -, ispmarin wrote:
> Hello all at Debian User.
>
> I am looking for a printer with very low per page cost (catridges,
> tonners etc) and not very expensive to buy. I dont care if it is laser
> or deskjet. Performance is not a issue (it can be slow), and the
>
Hello all at Debian User.
I am looking for a printer with very low per page cost (catridges,
tonners etc) and not very expensive to buy. I dont care if it is laser
or deskjet. Performance is not a issue (it can be slow), and the
quality of the page dont need to be high (I will print mainly texts
a
38 matches
Mail list logo
