On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 09:42:55PM -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
>
> Foolish me: I'd been happily running ssh 1:2.2.0p1 on my Potato
> system, and then I upgraded to ssh 1:2.2.0p1-1.1. (I got both of
> those versions from "unstable".) Well, that newer version doesn't
> work on potato, because it r
> Foolish me: I'd been happily running ssh 1:2.2.0p1 on my Potato
> system, and then I upgraded to ssh 1:2.2.0p1-1.1. (I got both of
> those versions from "unstable".) Well, that newer version doesn't
> work on potato, because it requires a newer libc. I don't care to
> upgrade libc, and ssh is
Once upon a time, I heard Eric Hanchrow say
>
> Foolish me: I'd been happily running ssh 1:2.2.0p1 on my Potato
> system, and then I upgraded to ssh 1:2.2.0p1-1.1. (I got both of
> those versions from "unstable".) Well, that newer version doesn't
> work on potato, because it requires a newer li
Foolish me: I'd been happily running ssh 1:2.2.0p1 on my Potato
system, and then I upgraded to ssh 1:2.2.0p1-1.1. (I got both of
those versions from "unstable".) Well, that newer version doesn't
work on potato, because it requires a newer libc. I don't care to
upgrade libc, and ssh is now broke
4 matches
Mail list logo