Thanks!
On Παρ, 2012-01-13 at 07:22 +0100, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
> 2012-01-12 09:40, Panayiotis Karabassis skrev:
> > On 01/11/2012 10:41 PM, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
> > Thanks, I'll wait for 3.2. Meanwhile I read the battery status with the
> > "acpi" command. Linux as opposed to GNU Hurd, you me
2012-01-12 09:40, Panayiotis Karabassis skrev:
On 01/11/2012 10:41 PM, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
Thanks, I'll wait for 3.2. Meanwhile I read the battery status with the
"acpi" command. Linux as opposed to GNU Hurd, you mean?
I upgraded the packages gnome-shell and gnome-shell-common to the
versio
2012-01-12 09:40, Panayiotis Karabassis skrev:
On 01/11/2012 10:41 PM, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
2012-01-11 20:26, Panayiotis Karabassis skrev:
I am neither certain, nor do I have a solution, but if I had
considered this a major problem, I would have updated gnome-shell to
3.2 from unstable (and so
On 01/11/2012 10:41 PM, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
2012-01-11 20:26, Panayiotis Karabassis skrev:
The title is self-explanatory. This is a new installation of Wheezy.
Has anyone else observed this?
Yes, i see it too in a wheezy installation I installed this year.
The only related message I can
2012-01-11 20:26, Panayiotis Karabassis skrev:
The title is self-explanatory. This is a new installation of Wheezy.
Has anyone else observed this?
Yes, i see it too in a wheezy installation I installed this year.
The only related message I can find in the logs, is a complaint about
gnome-po
The title is self-explanatory. This is a new installation of Wheezy.
Has anyone else observed this?
The only related message I can find in the logs, is a complaint about
gnome-power-manager missing. Indeed the package with the same name
contains only a gnome-power-statistics binary.
Many tha
6 matches
Mail list logo
