Kenneth Parker writes:
> I have a special issue: Using Gmail on a Phone or Tablet (I have
> both).
Both of those devices lack a proper keyboard. That makes them unsuitable
for composing anything but very short messages, and wholly unsuitable
for editing text.
> Seriously, how do others of you
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:17 AM, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> Seriously, how do others of you deal with navigating this Debian List on
> Android, while being a "Good Netizen"?
Personally I don't. A phone is a horrible tool for composing texts and
is nowhere near a replacement for a computer. Using an
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ric Moore wrote:
>
>
>
> Same reason some people top post. They just ignore the conventions.
>
I have a special issue: Using Gmail on a Phone or Tablet (I have both). I
have yet to find a Straightforward way to Snip lots of lines, using the
Android App. Als
On 09/13/2018 12:41 PM, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
Tixy wrote: "Sounds like the sort of thing the third party repository at
deb-multimedia.org does"
Why do they do that? Simply to order their repository ahead of the others?
Same reason some people top post. They just ignore the conventions.
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:32:57 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
Hello Dan,
>Basically, people who use deb-multimedia.org want someone to package up
>fresh versions of the kinds of tools that get updated frequently with
>new features, while mostly maintaining the stability that comes with
It's not that sim
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:41:39AM -0500, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
> Tixy wrote: "Sounds like the sort of thing the third party repository at
> deb-multimedia.org does"
>
> Why do they do that? Simply to order their repository ahead of the others?
> So why not just advise people to change sour
Tixy wrote: "Sounds like the sort of thing the third party repository at
deb-multimedia.org does"
Why do they do that? Simply to order their repository ahead of the others?
So why not just advise people to change sources.list? It seems like they don't
themselves make a statement on the subject
On 13/09/18 07:03, Tixy wrote:
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 19:54 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
At first, it sounded like the last `apt update` execution
occurred some time between “libbabl-dev” and “libbabl-0.1-0”
upgrade to version 0.1.56-1 on repositories side.
But “libbabl-0.1-0” seems somehow pic
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 19:54 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> At first, it sounded like the last `apt update` execution
> occurred some time between “libbabl-dev” and “libbabl-0.1-0”
> upgrade to version 0.1.56-1 on repositories side.
>
> But “libbabl-0.1-0” seems somehow picked from another
> repos
Bonjour Pétùr,
On 9/12/18 10:40 AM, Pétùr wrote:
> I can only find the 0.1-0 version:
Don't let yourself be fooled by the version number in the
package name (the part before the “/now”), and the real package
version number (the part between the “/now” and “amd64”). It is
a way to have various ve
Le 11/09/2018 à 20:09, Dan Ritter a écrit :
>
> and a check says that sid now has a version 0.1.56 of babl, so
> you should try installing that.
Hi,
I can only find the 0.1-0 version:
$ apt search libbabl
En train de trier... Fait
Recherche en texte intégral... Fait
libbabl-0.1-0/now 1:0.1.44-
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 07:12:19PM +0200, Pétùr wrote:
> Gimp does not start on debian sid and shows the message:
>
> ---
> BABL version too old!
>
> GIMP requires BABL version 0.1.56 or later.
> Installed BABL version is 0.1.44.
>
> Somehow you or your software packager managed
> to install GIM
Gimp does not start on debian sid and shows the message:
---
BABL version too old!
GIMP requires BABL version 0.1.56 or later.
Installed BABL version is 0.1.44.
Somehow you or your software packager managed
to install GIMP with an older BABL version.
Please upgrade to BABL version 0.1.56 or la
13 matches
Mail list logo
