Hi David,
I am working on a library called GDCM. I am always looking for DICOM
know to break other readers. Could you please send me a copy of this
DICOM dataset ? From the top of my head mecon does not support RGB
DICOM but is robust to a couple of known DICOM bugs.
GDCM is a DICOM library re
2006/12/4, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > No one would use lossy compression on medical x-rays.
lossy jpeg conforms to the DICOM Standard
Before I had a working linux viewer, just wanted to look at images.
If you haven't to see series exams (aka MR, CT) display from ImageMagick
wor
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 00:00 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 16:05:04 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 12/03/06 13:00, John Hasler wrote:
> > > David Baron writes:
> > >> just maybe I could get jpegs out of this thing ...
> > >
> > > No one would use lossy compression on medi
On Monday 04 December 2006 00:05, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 12/03/06 13:00, John Hasler wrote:
> > David Baron writes:
> >> just maybe I could get jpegs out of this thing ...
> >
> > No one would use lossy compression on medical x-rays.
>
> But those little bits of noise make life so interesting!!!
On Sunday 03 December 2006 22:56, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 21:57 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> > So I tried off Sid medcon (command line converter) and xmedcon (with GUI
> > and viewer). Segmentation faults, probably in common library used by the
> > two programs. Will try some o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/06 19:07, John Hasler wrote:
> Miles writes:
>> As I recall, there were some juicy lawsuits a while back - before people
>> figured out they shouldn't use lossy compression on medical x-rays.
>
> It's appalling that anyone responsible for suc
Miles writes:
> As I recall, there were some juicy lawsuits a while back - before people
> figured out they shouldn't use lossy compression on medical x-rays.
It's appalling that anyone responsible for such things would ever think you
should.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
John Hasler wrote:
David Baron writes:
just maybe I could get jpegs out of this thing ...
No one would use lossy compression on medical x-rays.
As I recall, there were some juicy lawsuits a while back - before people
figured out they shouldn't use lossy compression on medical x-ray
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 16:05:04 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 12/03/06 13:00, John Hasler wrote:
> > David Baron writes:
> >> just maybe I could get jpegs out of this thing ...
> >
> > No one would use lossy compression on medical x-rays.
>
> But those little bits of noise make life so interest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/06 13:00, John Hasler wrote:
> David Baron writes:
>> just maybe I could get jpegs out of this thing ...
>
> No one would use lossy compression on medical x-rays.
But those little bits of noise make life so interesting!!!
- --
Ron Johnson,
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:57:12PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> On Sunday 03 December 2006 21:13, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > > It seems this format is called DICOM, and a google search finds
> > > several
> > > applications claiming to be "free". I haven't looked any closer to see
> > > if they actua
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 21:57 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> So I tried off Sid medcon (command line converter) and xmedcon (with GUI and
> viewer). Segmentation faults, probably in common library used by the two
> programs. Will try some of the stuff on google.
Report it as bugs, you can use the "re
David Baron writes:
> just maybe I could get jpegs out of this thing ...
No one would use lossy compression on medical x-rays.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 03 December 2006 21:13, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> > It seems this format is called DICOM, and a google search finds
> > several
> > applications claiming to be "free". I haven't looked any closer to see
> > if they actually are free software or simply gratis.
>
> Of course, I forgot the mos
> It seems this format is called DICOM, and a google search finds
> several
> applications claiming to be "free". I haven't looked any closer to see
> if they actually are free software or simply gratis.
Of course, I forgot the most obvious... a simple "apt-cache search
dicom" shows several packag
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 20:45 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> The commercial packages is called "Diadisk". The array is placed under or
> patient and it records the image. It is later connected to the computer to
> retrieve the X-ray. Like all good commercial packages, the storage formats
> are nicely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 08:45:27PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Film is being made obselete not only in the realm of light photography but
> X-rays as well. Remember that little wrapped up card one held behind your
> teeth and then returned to the goo
Film is being made obselete not only in the realm of light photography but
X-rays as well. Remember that little wrapped up card one held behind your
teeth and then returned to the good dentist. This now has an array and cable
direct tot he computer. Sold by Kodak and others who need some other b
18 matches
Mail list logo
