Re: Fwd: Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-10 Thread Mike
MaD dUCK wrote: > set rant=on > > somebody please explain to me why this message, posted on 05 Mar 2001: > Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6]) > by sm3.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id f25KlGU16552 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 14

Re: Fwd: Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-09 Thread brian moore
(wonders why debian-user was copied on the reply, when I didn't post there... but what the hell, since you seem to think it's crucial for the whole world to see) On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 02:25:08PM -0500, MaD dUCK wrote: > also sprach brian moore (on Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:31:53AM -0800): > > Are

Re: Fwd: Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-09 Thread MaD dUCK
also sprach brian moore (on Fri, 09 Mar 2001 10:31:53AM -0800): > Are you [EMAIL PROTECTED] obviously not. > Temporary? No, the mail was sent to an address at rr.com, why would it > go to madduck.net? > > > the worst - i think i even received this message at one point. what's > > going on??? >

Fwd: Re: missing char-major-10-135

2001-03-09 Thread MaD dUCK
set rant=on somebody please explain to me why this message, posted on 05 Mar 2001: Received: from c241983-a.stcla1.sfba.home.com (HELO mickey.lan.aokiconsulting.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2001 20:15:36 - was handed off by murphy to a micro$oft server: