Reco (12020-12-21):
> You're right. Xorg is a server, any window manager on top of it is
> merely an X client (a special one, but an interchangeable client).
> Wayland is not a server, it's a set of protocols. An implementation of
> these protocols inherently provides a set of functions that are pr
El mar., 22 dic. 2020 14:07, Greg Wooledge escribió:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:12:28PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > Last I read wayland had serious accessibility problems. How does fvwm
> > work with screen readers and similar accessibility items and is fvwm
> > going the way of xWindows?
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:12:28PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Last I read wayland had serious accessibility problems. How does fvwm
> work with screen readers and similar accessibility items and is fvwm
> going the way of xWindows?
I have no experience with screen readers, and very little know
bian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Future of X, fvwm and wayland
> Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:33:57 + (UTC)
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:12:05PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > Makes you wonder how long it [X.org] wil
Hi.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:33:39PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:12:05PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > > Makes you wonder how long it [X.org] will be around; I guess a fair while
> > > though.
> >
> > I can't see why it'd need to be around for very long,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:12:05PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Makes you wonder how long it [X.org] will be around; I guess a fair while
> > though.
>
> I can't see why it'd need to be around for very long, given that it can
> be replaced by Wayland + Xwayland. So Xorg is only useful to the
Stefan Monnier (12020-12-21):
> I can't see why it'd need to be around for very long, given that it can
> be replaced by Wayland + Xwayland. So Xorg is only useful to the extent
> that it supports hardware that Wayland doesn't.
Quoting
https://wayland.freedesktop.org/docs/html/ch05.html#sect-X11-
> Makes you wonder how long it will be around; I guess a fair while
> though.
> [1] https://www.theregister.com/2020/10/30/x_server_lead_maintainer_declares/
I can't see why it'd need to be around for very long, given that it can
be replaced by Wayland + Xwayland. So Xorg is only useful to the ex
Sorry, quoting got messed up on my last email, fixed version below (I
hope)...
On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 08:15 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 06:32:20PM +0100, Kamil Jońca wrote:
[...]
> > As an user of FVWM (desktop box) and xfce (laptop) I feel little
> > lost.
> > In particul
On Mon, 2020-12-21 at 08:15 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 06:32:20PM +0100, Kamil Jońca wrote:
[...]
> As an user of FVWM (desktop box) and xfce (laptop) I feel little
> lost.
> In particular it is not clear to me if it will be possible to use
> FVWM /
> xfce on top (X)Waylan
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 06:32:20PM +0100, Kamil Jońca wrote:
> It seems, that main graphical UI base will be Wayland instead of X
> Window.
> If I understand correctly Wayland has no separate window manager
> process.
I think this is incorrect. There's still a window manager. You just
don't get
It seems, that main graphical UI base will be Wayland instead of X
Window.
If I understand correctly Wayland has no separate window manager
process.
As an user of FVWM (desktop box) and xfce (laptop) I feel little lost.
In particular it is not clear to me if it will be possible to use FVWM /
xfce
12 matches
Mail list logo
