On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:50:43PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 14:50:00 -0400, dman wrote:
| > Hey, yeah, xfontsel is a pretty neat tool.
|
| > It would be nice if it showed which specific font it was displaying when
| > it says "20 matches".
|
| Try "gtkfontsel".
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 08:31:24PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
| dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > How do I do that? That is, how do I know if a font is scalable or
| > not? Should I just remove the 100dpi and 75dpi font directories, or
| > are some of them scalable?
|
| Any PFB (Postscript)
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do I do that? That is, how do I know if a font is scalable or
> not? Should I just remove the 100dpi and 75dpi font directories, or
> are some of them scalable?
Any PFB (Postscript) or TTF font is scalable. Stuff in the speedo
directory is too. Anything
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 05:10:55PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
| dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > So, did you learn why the lower res fonts look better? It seems
| > counter-intuitive to me.
|
| Because "resolution" for bitmap fonts under X has nothing to do with
| the real size of your scre
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, did you learn why the lower res fonts look better? It seems
> counter-intuitive to me.
Because "resolution" for bitmap fonts under X has nothing to do with
the real size of your screen, just with the size it was designed to be
shown at. A font labeled as 1
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 14:50:00 -0400, dman wrote:
> Hey, yeah, xfontsel is a pretty neat tool.
> It would be nice if it showed which specific font it was displaying when
> it says "20 matches".
Try "gtkfontsel". It does a similar job to xfontsel, but its interface is
quite a bit more friendly a
(Cc'd back to the list)
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 11:53:33AM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
|
| on Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 11:26:44PM -0400, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|
| > Ok, I know you're all tired of hearing about X font problems, but this
| > problem is a bit different and wasn't solved by a
on Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 11:26:44PM -0400, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ok, I know you're all tired of hearing about X font problems, but this
> problem is a bit different and wasn't solved by any of the recently
> posted solutions.
>
> Ok, I have a woody box (that got sid by accident severa
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 08:59:45PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
| on Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 11:26:44PM -0400, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
...
| > Then I got some messed up fonts in X
...
| Incidentally, the confirmational phase of my tweak may be of use. The
| xfontsel program will show you
on Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 11:26:44PM -0400, dman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Ok, I know you're all tired of hearing about X font problems, but this
> problem is a bit different and wasn't solved by any of the recently
> posted solutions.
>
> Ok, I have a woody box (that got sid by accident sever
Ok, I know you're all tired of hearing about X font problems, but this
problem is a bit different and wasn't solved by any of the recently
posted solutions.
Ok, I have a woody box (that got sid by accident several weeks ago).
I tried reordering the FontPath lines in the X config file. Then I
got
11 matches
Mail list logo
