On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 02:33, M. Kirchhoff wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've spent the last two days scouring Google and the Debian-User archives in
> search of help with fonts under X (specifically, XFree86 4.2 and Fluxbox 0.1.7-3
> under Woody). In my search, I discovered that there is a lack of consist
Op za 14-06-2003, om 02:33 schreef M. Kirchhoff:
> Hi All,
>
> I've spent the last two days scouring Google and the Debian-User archives in
> search of help with fonts under X (specifically, XFree86 4.2 and Fluxbox 0.1.7-3
> under Woody). In my search, I discovered that there is a lack of consist
Hi,
I don't disagree with some of your points, or your feelings about the
font situation. I do remark that with many voluntary initiatives
(Gnome, KDE, WindowMaker, etc.) for desktops, I'm not surprised that
they don't all use one common scheme for fonts, and other aspects.
There is no one "GNU/
M. Kirchhoff wrote:
> If it's true that font servers aren't really necessary, then
> what is the easiest way to get good looking fonts simply using
> the XFree86 config files?
Because of a reinstall I went through it recently again. Some of
the main points are (I think):
- true, you don't need a
Hi All,
I've spent the last two days scouring Google and the Debian-User archives in
search of help with fonts under X (specifically, XFree86 4.2 and Fluxbox 0.1.7-3
under Woody). In my search, I discovered that there is a lack of consistent,
up-to-date information. For example, the XFree86 Font
5 matches
Mail list logo
