On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:51:36AM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > ...(see this page,
> > http://www.zip.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html, for full info), etc,
> > ...
>
> Is anyone else having trouble accessing that page (unknown host)?
.au operates a three-level domain he
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:54:32AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:51:36AM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> > Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > > ...(see this page,
> > > http://www.zip.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html, for full info), etc,
> > > ...
> >
> > Is anyone else having troub
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:51:36AM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> > ...(see this page,
> > http://www.zip.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html, for full info), etc,
> > ...
>
> Is anyone else having trouble accessing that page (unknown host)?
Yeah, it's zip.com.au, not zip.au. (Australian domains are
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:38:34AM +1100, Russell Shaw wrote:
> tune2fs -j /dev/
> Can't remember if device should be unmounted (i'd try that first).
Not necissary.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:29:09PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
> tune2fs -j /dev/hdXX
What if my hard drive's SCSI? EXT3 can't possibly be IDE/MFM/RLL
exclusive, can it? 8:o)
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have be
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:23:27PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> > My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
> > work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within a
> > few minutes from ext2 on the command line.
>
> What do you use to convert?
As a courtesy
Once upon a time Daniel B. said...
> Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > ...(see this page,
> > http://www.zip.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html, for full info), etc,
> > ...
>
> Is anyone else having trouble accessing that page (unknown host)?
The host should be www.zip.com.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Daniel B. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030218 21:25]:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > ...
> > > My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
> > > work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within a
> > > few minutes from
At 10:51 AM 2/19/2003 -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> ...(see this page,
> http://www.zip.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html, for full info), etc,
> ...
Is anyone else having trouble accessing that page (unknown host)?
I didn't have any trouble last night when I sent it, but to
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> ...(see this page,
> http://www.zip.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html, for full info), etc,
> ...
Is anyone else having trouble accessing that page (unknown host)?
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 18:23, Daniel B. wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > ...
> > My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
> > work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within a
> > few minutes from ext2 on the command line.
>
> What do you use to convert
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 13:23, Daniel B. wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > ...
> > My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
> > work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within
> > a few minutes from ext2 on the command line.
>
> What do you use t
Daniel B. wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
...
My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within a
few minutes from ext2 on the command line.
What do you use to convert?
Daniel
tune2fs -j /dev/
Can't remem
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:23:27PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > ...
> > My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
> > work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within a
> > few minutes from ext2 on the command line.
>
> What do you u
* Daniel B. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030218 21:25]:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > ...
> > My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
> > work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within a
> > few minutes from ext2 on the command line.
>
> What do you use to conve
Paul Johnson wrote:
> ...
> My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
> work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within a
> few minutes from ext2 on the command line.
What do you use to convert?
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSU
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:19:22AM -0700, Al Davis wrote:
> The basic question ... Why choose one over the other? Technically, what is
> different?
My pick of ext3 was the fact that all the tools that work with ext2
work just as readily with ext3. I was also able to convert within a
few minute
Quoting Al Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am trying to understand them.
>
> The basic question ... Why choose one over the other? Technically, what is
> different?
>
> My benchmarks seem to show that Reiser is superior, but they may be flawed.
> What I see is that it is faster and uses space
I am trying to understand them.
The basic question ... Why choose one over the other? Technically, what is
different?
My benchmarks seem to show that Reiser is superior, but they may be flawed.
What I see is that it is faster and uses space more efficiently.
I get about a 4:1 difference fo
19 matches
Mail list logo
