Hi Andy
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 at 9:05 PM
> From: "Andy Smith"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: You know what? Not only Debian but Fedora 35 has libthai
> tooand more
>
>
> systemd and all of Fedora is open source. While
Hi Andy
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 2:22 AM
> From: "Andrew M.A. Cater"
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: You know what? Not only Debian but Fedora 35 has libthai
> tooand more
>
> Very grateful to Simon McVitie (smcv) for pointing
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:06:27PM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I ran some tests on almost all flavors of Fedora 35. They include:
>
> "Default" edition
>
> Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
>
> Network Installer
>
>
re listening to the very worst of the lunatic fringe. This
really is QAnon-level silliness.
systemd and all of Fedora is open source. While it's certainly not
impossible to actively embed back doors in open source software,
it's not a very good place to do so because it could be found b
Le 14/02/2022 à 13:23, Thomas Schmitt a écrit :
Hi,
Dan Ritter wrote:
You can point at the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, and the KGB.
How come nobody ever thinks of our german BND when it's about successful
conspiracy ?
Maybe because theirs are really successfull.
Hi,
Dan Ritter wrote:
> You can point at the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, and the KGB.
How come nobody ever thinks of our german BND when it's about successful
conspiracy ?
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
Stella Ashburne wrote:
>
> Introducing Khmer fonts, Thai fonts and libthai could be another way for the
> three-letter-agencies' spooks to spy on the Linux community. What do you
> think?
I think that when someone claims that there is a conspiracy that
is using a particular method, you need t
Hi guys
I ran some tests on almost all flavors of Fedora 35. They include:
"Default" edition
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
Network Installer
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
Fedora Spins such as
Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso
Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-
indicates that this is going to hit all Linux containers using
glibc >= 2.33. Fedora 35 is just the first casualty.
The upstream bug that's referenced there also provides a fix and that
has been integrated in the Podman that's in Debian Testing.
(I checked that there is no issue on De
On 07.11.21 23:24, Ulf Volmer wrote:
On 07.11.21 22:28, Ulf Volmer wrote:
On 06.11.21 01:46, Francois Gouget wrote:
So I'm trying to use a fedora Podman image on my Debian 11 machine but
for some reason DNS lookups do not seem to be working in the container
environment. Specifi
On 07.11.21 22:28, Ulf Volmer wrote:
On 06.11.21 01:46, Francois Gouget wrote:
So I'm trying to use a fedora Podman image on my Debian 11 machine but
for some reason DNS lookups do not seem to be working in the container
environment. Specifically:
$ podman run --rm -it fedora:latest
On 06.11.21 01:46, Francois Gouget wrote:
So I'm trying to use a fedora Podman image on my Debian 11 machine but
for some reason DNS lookups do not seem to be working in the container
environment. Specifically:
$ podman run --rm -it fedora:latest
# dnf install gzip
[...]
Fedora 35 - x
So I'm trying to use a fedora Podman image on my Debian 11 machine but
for some reason DNS lookups do not seem to be working in the container
environment. Specifically:
$ podman run --rm -it fedora:latest
# dnf install gzip
[...]
Fedora 35 - x86_64
On 2018-09-19 10:02 a.m., Frank McCormick wrote:
I installed Fedora 28 on a second partition sda6 on my hd yesterday.
It seemed to go well, but this morning when I booted into my
regular system Debian Sid and tried to install Grub into
the Debian partition sda5 it refused saying ext2 file
I installed Fedora 28 on a second partition sda6 on my hd yesterday.
It seemed to go well, but this morning when I booted into my
regular system Debian Sid and tried to install Grub into
the Debian partition sda5 it refused saying ext2 file systems
are not supported without blocklists. sda5
On Thu 22 Feb 2018 at 18:56:11 (+0100), Erwan David wrote:
> Le 02/22/18 à 18:07, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:15:43PM +, Indo Neh wrote:
> >>There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
> >>
Le 02/22/18 à 18:07, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:15:43PM +, Indo Neh wrote:
>>There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
>>Anaconda installer to recognize a drive as a GPT drive for the purposes of
>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 04:15:43PM +, Indo Neh wrote:
>There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
>Anaconda installer to recognize a drive as a GPT drive for the purposes of
>the Anaconda installer setting up the drive with a
There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
Anaconda installer to recognize a drive as a GPT drive for the purposes of
the Anaconda installer setting up the drive with a GPT partition table.
https://rhinstaller.github.io/anaconda/boot-options.html#inst-gpt
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:23:42AM +, Indo Neh wrote:
>
>Could this somehow be added to the Debian installer as this option is
>useful for anyone who wants to set up a drive on a BIOS-based system as a
>GPT drive without having to manually partition the drive after manually
>se
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:23:42AM +, Indo Neh wrote:
> Could this somehow be added to the Debian installer as this option is
> I didn't realise people would get so stuck on names, by the 2nd email it
> should have been obvious I meant this about Debian not Ubuntu.
In your 2nd email you we
There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
Anaconda installer to recognize a drive as a GPT drive for the purposes of
the Anaconda installer setting up the drive with a GPT partition table.
https://rhinstaller.github.io/anaconda/boot-options.html#inst-gpt
On November 6, 2017 7:12:37 PM EST, Richard Owlett wrote:
>Why isn't query by user of a derivative [Ununtu] ask parent distro
>[Debian] suggest a feature.
Because ubuntu has its own installer. Since an end user typically
doesn't know what parts of a derivative are straight from upstream and
wh
On Mon, 06 Nov 2017, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Why isn't query by user of a derivative [Ununtu] ask parent distro [Debian]
> suggest a feature.
Ubuntu uses Ubiquity. Debian does not.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
Cheop's Law: Nothing ever gets built on schedul
On 11/06/2017 03:26 PM, David Wright wrote:
(Copied to the OP.)
On Mon 06 Nov 2017 at 20:34:38 (+), Tom Furie wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:04:40PM +, Indo Neh wrote:
There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
Could this somehow be added t
(Copied to the OP.)
On Mon 06 Nov 2017 at 20:34:38 (+), Tom Furie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:04:40PM +, Indo Neh wrote:
> > There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
>
> > Could this somehow be added to Ubiquity as this
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:04:40PM +, Indo Neh wrote:
> There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
> Could this somehow be added to Ubiquity as this option is useful for anyone
Wasn't the reply you received yesterday sufficient? You'll
There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
Anaconda installer to recognize a drive as a GPT drive for the purposes of
the Anaconda installer setting up the drive with a GPT partition table.
https://rhinstaller.github.io/anaconda/boot-options.html#inst-gpt
Indo Neh wrote:
> There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
> Anaconda installer to recognize a drive as a GPT drive for the purposes of
> the Anaconda installer setting up the drive with a GPT partition table.
>
> https://rhinstalle
There is a boot option in Fedora 'inst.gpt' which forces the Fedora 26
Anaconda installer to recognize a drive as a GPT drive for the purposes of
the Anaconda installer setting up the drive with a GPT partition table.
https://rhinstaller.github.io/anaconda/boot-options.html#inst-gpt
On Tue, 14 May 2013, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 May 2013, Joel Roth wrote:
> >
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> This is borderling off-topic: I'm using qemu under Debian to
> >> try to run the latest Fedora 64-bit
Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Joel Roth wrote:
Hi list,
This is borderling off-topic: I'm using qemu under Debian to
try to run the latest Fedora 64-bit .iso.
qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -cdrom
Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso -m 512 linux.img
Fedora boots, the sp
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:17:02PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This is borderling off-topic: I'm using qemu under Debian to
> try to run the latest Fedora 64-bit .iso.
>
> qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -cdrom Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso -m
> 512 li
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
> >Hi list,
> >
> >This is borderling off-topic: I'm using qemu under Debian to
> >try to run the latest Fedora 64-bit .iso.
> >
> >qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -cdrom Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso -
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This is borderling off-topic: I'm using qemu under Debian to
> try to run the latest Fedora 64-bit .iso.
>
> qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -cdrom
> Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso -m 512 linux.img
>
> F
Joel Roth wrote:
>Hi list,
>
>This is borderling off-topic: I'm using qemu under Debian to
>try to run the latest Fedora 64-bit .iso.
>
>qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -cdrom Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso -m
>512 linux.img
>
>Fedora boots, the spinner-
I'm using VirtualBox to run other Linux distros and Windows by a Linux
install, if needed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1368483748.1616.2.camel@arch
Hi list,
This is borderling off-topic: I'm using qemu under Debian to
try to run the latest Fedora 64-bit .iso.
qemu-system-x86_64 --enable-kvm -cdrom Fedora-18-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso -m 512
linux.img
Fedora boots, the spinner-pointer runs, and eventually the
system hangs showing a mo
dy has an idea? :(
>
>Well, a good idea would be for you to post on some relevant list - try
>Fedora or Ubuntu.
>
>I doubt whether any debianites could give you an answer.
>
>
>>
>>
>>> I installed a Fedora 14 first, then an Ubuntu 10.04. I installed
On 16/04/11 13:23, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
nobody has an idea? :(
Well, a good idea would be for you to post on some relevant list - try
Fedora or Ubuntu.
I doubt whether any debianites could give you an answer.
Be Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:43:49 -0700 johhny_at_poland77 írta
I
nobody has an idea? :(
Be Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:43:49 -0700 johhny_at_poland77 írta
>I installed a Fedora 14 first, then an Ubuntu 10.04. I installed them using
>dm_crypt/aes256/lvm, so i used encrypted VolumeGroups. ok.
>
>At the end of the ubuntu install it said it ca
On 13 April 2011 23:43, johhny_at_poland77 wrote:
> I installed a Fedora 14 first, then an Ubuntu 10.04. I installed them using
> dm_crypt/aes256/lvm, so i used encrypted VolumeGroups. ok.
[snip]
> p.s.: i posted to Debian list too, because i don't think it's a
> Di
I installed a Fedora 14 first, then an Ubuntu 10.04. I installed them using
dm_crypt/aes256/lvm, so i used encrypted VolumeGroups. ok.
At the end of the ubuntu install it said it cannot install GRUB...ok
So i had to use SuperGRUBdisk to start Fedora&give out the command:
"grub-ins
On 13/07/10 01:58 AM, Tom H wrote:
>
> Quite frankly, I thought that this had been fixed (I read it on either
> the Debian or Ubuntu bug reporting system), but I came across this
> problem last year and the script was looking for initrds of the form
> "initrd.img-..." and therefore ignored "initra
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-07-13 07:45 +0200, H.S. wrote:
>
>> On 13/07/10 01:28 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes. The Fedora/RHEL initrd names are not recognized by Debian/Ubuntu's
>>> grub...
>
> It should work
On 2010-07-13 07:45 +0200, H.S. wrote:
> On 13/07/10 01:28 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Yes. The Fedora/RHEL initrd names are not recognized by Debian/Ubuntu's
>> grub...
It should work in os-prober 1.39.
> I see. Could you briefly explain why is that?
Because Fedor
t;> I have to put the correct stanza myself in /etc/grub.d/40_custom to get
>>> the correct grub entry which works:
>
>>>
>>> So there still appears to be some problem somewhere.
>>
>> Yes. The Fedora/RHEL initrd names are not recognized by Debian/Ubuntu&
On 2010-07-13 07:38 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but any system that you install _after_ Debian will not
>> automagically show up in the menu. You'll probably have to add it by
>> hand then.
I was talking about grub-legacy here.
> Any sy
t
>> the correct grub entry which works:
>>
>> So there still appears to be some problem somewhere.
>
> Yes. The Fedora/RHEL initrd names are not recognized by Debian/Ubuntu's
> grub...
I see. Could you briefly explain why is that?
--
Please reply to t
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> Yes, but any system that you install _after_ Debian will not
> automagically show up in the menu. You'll probably have to add it by
> hand then.
Any system that you install after Debian is added (in my experience)
or should be added to gru
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:37 AM, H.S. wrote:
> On 12/07/10 03:07 PM, H.S. wrote:
>>
>> Curiously though, update-grub is now detecting Fedora 13! It was not
>
> Well, I wrote that too soon.
>
> Here is what update-grub puts in /boot/grub
> /grub.cfg regard
On 12/07/10 03:07 PM, H.S. wrote:
>
> Curiously though, update-grub is now detecting Fedora 13! It was not
Well, I wrote that too soon.
Here is what update-grub puts in /boot/grub
/grub.cfg regarding the Fedora 13 installation:
###
men
On 07/12/2010 12:17 PM, H.S. wrote:
On a newly installed Debian Testing system, I installed Fedora 13 in a
partition but chose not to install the boot loaded since I wanted to use
Debian's boot loader for all OSes.
Now when I do update-grub in Debian, it detects all OSes installed in
the
grub-pc:
>>>>
>>>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=grub-pc
>>>
>>> s/grub-pc/os-prober/
>>>
>>> Foreign operating systems are (supposed to be) detected by os-prober, so
>>> if Fedora 13 does not show up, this
On 2010-07-12 20:21 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:03:47 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2010-07-12 19:41 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>>> Foreign operating systems are (supposed to be) detected by os-prober,
>>>> so if Fedora 13 do
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:03:47 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-07-12 19:41 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> Foreign operating systems are (supposed to be) detected by os-prober,
>>> so if Fedora 13 does not show up, this is a bug in os-prober.
>>
>> Mmm, I
ian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=grub-pc
>>
>> s/grub-pc/os-prober/
>>
>> Foreign operating systems are (supposed to be) detected by os-prober, so
>> if Fedora 13 does not show up, this is a bug in os-prober.
>
> Mmm, I don't even have that installed on
cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=grub-pc
>>
>> s/grub-pc/os-prober/
>>
>> Foreign operating systems are (supposed to be) detected by os-prober, so
>> if Fedora 13 does not show up, this is a bug in os-prober.
>
> Mmm, I don't even have that installed on my
> Foreign operating systems are (supposed to be) detected by os-prober, so
> if Fedora 13 does not show up, this is a bug in os-prober.
Ah, yes, that is what I was searching for, but I was looking for
probe-os and was a bit confused why I wasn't able to get the right
search res
prober/
>
> Foreign operating systems are (supposed to be) detected by os-prober, so
> if Fedora 13 does not show up, this is a bug in os-prober.
Mmm, I don't even have that installed on my system (lenny) :-?
Is it a required package for GRUB (legacy or 2) to detect the available
On 2010-07-12 19:09 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> Also, take a look into the bugs that have already filled for grub-pc:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=grub-pc
s/grub-pc/os-prober/
Foreign operating systems are (supposed to be) detected by os-prober, so
if Fedora 13
ot; command, it writes a bad entry for
> fedora13 or just writes nothing?
Nothing at all. It plain ignores F13. My manually entered lines in
/etc/grub.d/40_custom work though.
#######
menuentry "Fedora release 13 (on /dev/mapper/vg1-lv8)&qu
under the "/boot" partition, not sure if this condition fits in your
>> case.
>
> I have F13's kernel on a partition mounted as /boot2 (primary partition,
> not in LVM) in my Debian's fstab. However, update-grub works on all
> other OSes I have on my hard drive
On 12/07/10 12:15 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:17:53 -0400, H.S. wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> Now when I do update-grub in Debian, it detects all OSes installed in
>> the hard drives connected to the system, but does not detect Fedora 13.
>> I had to man
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:17:53 -0400, H.S. wrote:
(...)
> Now when I do update-grub in Debian, it detects all OSes installed in
> the hard drives connected to the system, but does not detect Fedora 13.
> I had to manually add the stanza lines for F13 to get its option in the
> gr
On a newly installed Debian Testing system, I installed Fedora 13 in a
partition but chose not to install the boot loaded since I wanted to use
Debian's boot loader for all OSes.
Now when I do update-grub in Debian, it detects all OSes installed in
the hard drives connected to the system
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 12:31:02PM +, James Allsopp wrote:
> Hi,
> I've a Fedora 12 system which I'm distinctly unimpressed by, and want to
> install Debian. It's currently set up with two 1 tb drives. These both
> have a 250 Mb boot partition and then the rest is
James Allsopp schreef:
Hi,
I've a Fedora 12 system which I'm distinctly unimpressed by, and want to
install Debian. It's currently set up with two 1 tb drives. These both
have a 250 Mb boot partition and then the rest is a RAID 1, hosting LVM
for the other partitions. Am I going
Hi,
I've a Fedora 12 system which I'm distinctly unimpressed by, and want to
install Debian. It's currently set up with two 1 tb drives. These both
have a 250 Mb boot partition and then the rest is a RAID 1, hosting LVM
for the other partitions. Am I going to have to back up all of
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:30:29 -0500
Michael Pobega wrote:
> Not to bring up an old thread (I'm bored here on the train, reading
> through my archives of d-u), but why do people feel the need to tell
> everyone when they are leaving?
It's probably likely that they never arrived in the first place.
John Hasler schreef:
I think that's a positive feature of the Debian BTS. People who are unable
or unwilling to figure out how to use either Reportbug or the pointy-clicky
Reportbug-ng are unlikely to file useful bug reports.
I disagree with you there. If somebody sees a random application cra
this is not constructive, not
> > at all as constructive as a complete bug report, but we could also try to do
> > something with these e-mails as far as we can.
> >
>
> Some people just don't know how to file a bug report. And to be
> honest, on Debian with no WWW bu
Dotan Cohen writes:
> So, have those items been added to this hyppothetical TODO list? Where is
> this list on the intercords?
In the Debian Bug Tracking System.
> Some people just don't know how to file a bug report. And to be honest,
> on Debian with no WWW bug reporting interface I just don't
bug reporting interface I just don't
file them. I file against Ubuntu, KDE, and, well, Fedora.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه-و-ي
А-Б-В-Г-Д-Е-Ё-Ж-З-И-Й-К-Л
Michael Pobega wrote:
> Not to bring up an old thread (I'm bored here on the train, reading
> through my archives of d-u), but why do people feel the need to tell
> everyone when they are leaving? I mean, if it was someone who's names I
> recognize from seeing often (Joey Hess and Celejar come to m
Michael Pobega schreef:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:22:08AM -0400, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
and ATI with the update. No need even to try it with
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:22:08AM -0400, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
> Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
> in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
> and ATI with the update. No need even to try it with my d
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
> I hardly find Debian a stable distro.
Using debian testing for about 6 years now on all my servers, PCs and
laptops, and constantly torturing my systems with packet
installs/uninstalls/manual configurations and all kind of fiddling
inside /etc/, I really don't ha
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi,
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
If you like Fedora then you will love CentOS, in my humble opinion
Fedora is no more than testing for Red Hat, while CentOS is Red Hat
Enterprise.
Umm, I think it would be more correct to compare Fedora with Debian SID
-- Fedora is testing
Hi,
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
If you like Fedora then you will love CentOS, in my humble opinion
Fedora is no more than testing for Red Hat, while CentOS is Red Hat
Enterprise.
Umm, I think it would be more correct to compare Fedora with Debian SID --
Fedora is testing ground and the baby of Red
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
and ATI with the update. No need even to try it with my dell or my
Aspireone. So byebye Debian.
I found on lenny many
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
> Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
> in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
> and ATI with the update. No need even to try it with my dell or my
> Aspireone. So byebye Debian.
othing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
> and ATI with the update.
What's the output of lspci on that box?
> I find hard fedora reporting a segfault, like
> lenny gave yestarday on networks-admin gui.
What specific tool is it? What were you trying to do? Is this issue
repr
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
> Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
> in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
> and ATI with the update. No need even to try it with my dell or my
> Aspireone. So byebye Debian.
The best to do with is mail was to put it to the trash-can.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo <
rodolfo.alca...@padep.org.bo> wrote:
> Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
> in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
> and ATI with the update. No need
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:22:08AM -0400, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
> Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
> in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
> and ATI with the update. No need even to try it with my d
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo said:
> So byebye Debian.
Around here we have a saying, "don't let the door hit you in the a$$
on the way out."
Means, "don't brag about it, just hurry up and go, for doG's sake!"
Cybe R. Wizard
--
Nice computers don't go down.
Larry Niven, Steven Barnes
> From: Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo [mailto:rodolfo.alca...@padep.org.bo]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 7:22 AM
> Subject: Fedora guy byebyes Debian
>
> Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi
work
> in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora w
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo escribió:
> Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
> in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
> and ATI with the update. No need even to try it with my dell or my
> Aspireone. So byebye Debian.
Well, a fun time (one week), sweating it up to make my ATI and Wifi work
in Lenny AMD64 but nothing. With old fedora wifi works from the live cd
and ATI with the update. No need even to try it with my dell or my
Aspireone. So byebye Debian.
I found on lenny many of the bugs and troubles found in
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
>
>>> Is there any short install guide (like http://www.fedorafaq.org/) you
>>> can suggest for a debian newbie?
>> Maybe http://www.debian-administration.org/
>
> Very fuzzy. You can read the former and be crystal clear into fedor
orking for you now?
Is there any short install guide (like http://www.fedorafaq.org/) you
can suggest for a debian newbie?
Maybe http://www.debian-administration.org/
Very fuzzy. You can read the former and be crystal clear into fedora in
10 minutes. Im sure Debian has something like that.
Bah,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 07:51:00AM -0400, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 15:53 -0600 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> > On 02/17/2009 03:00 PM, Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
> > > Is there any short install guide (like http://www.fedorafaq.org/) you
> > > can suggest for a
.debianhelp.org/.
No, man, too much detail, im yet into linux, this actual list is better
than both of them pages. Yet my suggestion its called "fedorafaq.org",
is both a faq and an install guide.
> Coming from Fedora,
> ... there is no runlevel (init x)
> ... servic
dorafaq.org/) you
> > can suggest for a debian newbie?
> Maybe http://www.debian-administration.org/
Very fuzzy. You can read the former and be crystal clear into fedora in
10 minutes. Im sure Debian has something like that.
Thanks, my best regards.
--
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/17/2009 03:58 PM, H.S. wrote:
>>
>> Other than this, you will find this list very helpful. Searching google
>> usually gives pretty good hits too.
>>
>> Coming from Fedora, it may be no useful to know that there is no
>> runlevel
On 2009-02-17 23:07 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 February 2009 21:58:20 H.S. wrote:
>> Coming from Fedora, it may be no useful to know that there is no
>> runlevel (init x) command in Debian as there is in Fedora. Most common
>> use for me of these commands was t
On 02/17/2009 03:58 PM, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo wrote:
Hi all,
my first day on the list, usually, I use fedora, since fedora 1 (today's
release is 10). Now, I'm trying Lenny. Downloaded netinst AMD64 but no
GUI. Now, installing fglrx.
Is there any short ins
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 21:58:20 H.S. wrote:
> Coming from Fedora, it may be no useful to know that there is no
> runlevel (init x) command in Debian as there is in Fedora. Most common
> use for me of these commands was to restart the gui. In debian, almost
> all such services ar
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
