Re: FW: Sound Blaster Live Support

2003-03-01 Thread Haim Ashkenazi
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 01:47, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:35:34PM -0500, Bob Paige wrote: > > Fortunately, when I upgraded from kernel 2.2.x to 2.4.20 (that is from > > 'testing'; I think 2.4.19 is in 'stable') it included the emu10K driver > > as a module, so it just worked. > >

Re: FW: Sound Blaster Live Support

2003-02-25 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:35:34PM -0500, Bob Paige wrote: > Fortunately, when I upgraded from kernel 2.2.x to 2.4.20 (that is from > 'testing'; I think 2.4.19 is in 'stable') it included the emu10K driver > as a module, so it just worked. It's also in the 2.4.18 (IIRC) kernel from woody, just n

Re: FW: Sound Blaster Live Support

2003-02-25 Thread Bob Paige
Administrator wrote: Sound support seems to be one of the less well documented areas for Linux in general and Debian in particular (go ahead, flame away and point me to the how-to's I missed!). I know I SHOULD be able to get a happy configuration with my Sound Blaster Live - but I'm not getting ve

FW: Sound Blaster Live Support

2003-02-25 Thread Administrator
Sound support seems to be one of the less well documented areas for Linux in general and Debian in particular (go ahead, flame away and point me to the how-to's I missed!). I know I SHOULD be able to get a happy configuration with my Sound Blaster Live - but I'm not getting very far. The frustrat