[Paul, please don't post in html]
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 06:42:38AM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On 02/13/2014 05:37 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> I just did the "init=/lib/systemd/systemd" on the linux command line as
> a oncer and noticed.
You snipped what I noticed.
> Now:
> root@ta
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 06:42 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 190488 Dec 31 12:54 systemd-journald
I at least would expect the f...ine journal. For Chris that much is
missing that I suspect he runs some kind of
transition-SysVinit-systemd-hybrid. This is something comparable
On 02/13/2014 05:37 AM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
I just did the "init=/lib/systemd/systemd" on the linux command line as
a oncer and noticed.
Now:
root@tal:~# ls -al /lib/systemd/
total 260
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jan 20 23:12 .
drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 12288
On Wednesday 12 February 2014 12:13:23 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> (emphasis and guessed spelling correction mine).
Scott - the original strikes me as being correct, and
oyur "correction" strikes me as being wrong.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
On 13/02/14 21:37, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:13:51PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2014-02-12 06:12 +0100, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> Does anyone knows who sells round tuits?
Yes. (disclaimer, I get a commission from them) - but my advice it to
buy the square ones a
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:13:51PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-02-12 06:12 +0100, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > I tried systemd - booted really fast, but it didn't honor any console
> > font settings I had. I groaned and reverted back realising, after seeing
> > quite a bit of discussion,
>
> [latinfo, are you subscribed to this list? If so we could stop CC'ing
> you]
No, i am not subscribed, but it is not a problem if you CC me. Thanks
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:50:33AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 17:55 -0800, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
>> > Normally in
On 2014-02-12 06:12 +0100, Chris Bannister wrote:
> I tried systemd - booted really fast, but it didn't honor any console
> font settings I had. I groaned and reverted back realising, after seeing
> quite a bit of discussion, that there was another setup to learn! In
> this case the learning would
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 04:50:49 PM Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf writes:
> > If we like it or dislike it, sysvinit / init scripts are dead.
>
> Sounds like a Bad News(TM).
Why bad news? SysV init's been dead through most of the rest of *nix-land
(Even most certified Unixen do
Ralf Mardorf writes:
> If we like it or dislike it, sysvinit / init scripts are dead.
Sounds like a Bad News(TM).
--
/\ ___Ubuntu: ancient
/___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_ African word
//--\| | \| | Integralista GNUslami
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:18 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> I think that Debian have a quite great percentage of tinkerers
> which will be able to produce lot of documents to replace an init system
> by another one. In fact, there already have some, which allowed me to
> give a try
Le 12.02.2014 12:48, James Allsopp a écrit :
Hi Scott,
Fair enough with this point; "a. The decision *was* made by Debian
developers, as it should be. Those
that do, get to make decisions about how they do 'it' - those that
use,
feel free to use elsewhere - or do their own fork instead of get
On 12/02/14 22:48, James Allsopp wrote:
> Hi Scott,
> Fair enough with this point; "a. The decision *was* made by Debian
> developers, as it should be. Those
> that do, get to make decisions about how they do 'it' - those that use,
> feel free to use elsewhere - or do their own fork instead of gett
[James, please don top post on this mailing list.]
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:48:37AM +, James Allsopp wrote:
> Is there a document that summarises what developers thought the pros and
> cons of each were? I've read LP's comments on systemd, but that hardly
> falls into the balanced camp.
A q
Hi Scott,
Fair enough with this point; "a. The decision *was* made by Debian
developers, as it should be. Those
that do, get to make decisions about how they do 'it' - those that use,
feel free to use elsewhere - or do their own fork instead of getting
others to do it for them."
Although I mention
On 12/02/14 20:27, James Allsopp wrote:
> Hi,
> After reading through all the pros and cons, it seems that there isn't a
> good replacement at all, so it would be better to wait. Admittedly I use
> OpenRC on my gentoo machine and it's fine. Systemd seems to violate too
> many Unix principles and Up
On 12/02/14 20:27, James Allsopp wrote:
> Hi,
> After reading through all the pros and cons, it seems that there isn't a
> good replacement at all, so it would be better to wait. Admittedly I use
> OpenRC on my gentoo machine and it's fine. Systemd seems to violate too
> many Unix principles and Up
Hi,
After reading through all the pros and cons, it seems that there isn't a
good replacement at all, so it would be better to wait. Admittedly I use
OpenRC on my gentoo machine and it's fine. Systemd seems to violate too
many Unix principles and Upstart has problems with the canonical copyright
li
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
>
> I tried systemd - booted really fast, but it didn't honor any console
> font settings I had. I groaned and reverted back realising, after seeing
> quite a bit of discussion, that there was another setup to learn! In
> this case the learn
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
>
> Let the flames begin...
Please no!
The -devel@ and -ctte@ lists already have some, most likely
non-Debian-using crazies, posting there so the d-u members who want to
"discuss" this should feel free to join the delirium there and
preserve
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:55:17PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 11 Feb 2014 at 23:45:45 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 00:24 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > Let the flames begin...
> >
> > I'm aware that it isn't off-topic, anyway, I strongly recommend to
> > discuss sy
On Tue 11 Feb 2014 at 23:45:45 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 00:24 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Let the flames begin...
>
> I'm aware that it isn't off-topic, anyway, I strongly recommend to
> discuss systemd at
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-communit
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 00:24 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Let the flames begin...
I'm aware that it isn't off-topic, anyway, I strongly recommend to
discuss systemd at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic .
Once a pros and cons systemd discussion develops its own
Let the flames begin...
- Forwarded message from Don Armstrong -
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:39:04 -0800
From: Don Armstrong
To: debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org
Subject: [CTTE #727708] Default init system for Debian
Mail-Followup-To: debian-c...@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.
24 matches
Mail list logo
