On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 04:49:22AM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:39:57AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:02:33PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > > Should that (ip_conntrack_ftp) work for a non-NAT filter as well?
> > >
> > > Or is there some o
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 04:39:57AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:02:33PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > Should that (ip_conntrack_ftp) work for a non-NAT filter as well?
> >
> > Or is there some other trick for that?
>
> I don't imagine it would, but then again, I've n
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:02:33PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> Should that (ip_conntrack_ftp) work for a non-NAT filter as well?
>
> Or is there some other trick for that?
I don't imagine it would, but then again, I've never tried it so I
don't know firsthand. Care to try it and post the resu
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:10:35PM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
>
> Rob's suggestions did the trick! I didn't have ipt_nat_ftp and
> ipt_conntrack_ftp loaded.
Should that (ip_conntrack_ftp) work for a non-NAT filter as well?
Or is there some other trick for that?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To UNSUBS
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 06:11:04AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote..
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:55:55PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> > > I thought that it would be easy to make the switch on the client side,
> > > but I've run into problems. At first I thought it was my firewall that
> > > was stop
5 matches
Mail list logo