On Ma, 29 iun 21, 22:41:10, Gareth Evans wrote:
>
> Even if I had made use of upgrade rather than dist-upgrade, presumably
> a dist-upgrade would have been indicated here (by the existence of
> packages kept back) and the same position would have resulted - ie.
> having to wait for a potentiall
On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 22:41:10 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote:
> On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 17:11, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade
On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 22:41, Gareth Evans wrote:
> On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 17:11, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was un
On Tue 29 Jun 2021, at 17:11, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was unconstrained,
> > > and so shim-signed could be removed becaus
On Tue 29 Jun 2021 at 08:29:22 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was unconstrained,
> > and so shim-signed could be removed because it was no longer being
> > held onto as a Depends or Recomm
On Lu, 28 iun 21, 09:46:17, David Wright wrote:
>
> But your evening run of apt-get -y dist-upgrade was unconstrained,
> and so shim-signed could be removed because it was no longer being
> held onto as a Depends or Recommends.
Except that `apt-get dist-upgrade` doesn't do that (`autoremove`
On Sun 27 Jun 2021 at 05:31:05 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote:
> On Tue 22 Jun 2021, at 19:13, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 08:59:13 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote:
> > > A recent dist-upgrade on Buster (in a scripted cron job run at 01:00
> > > daily) failed due to apt-listbugs compla
On Tue 22 Jun 2021, at 19:13, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 08:59:13 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote:
> > A recent dist-upgrade on Buster (in a scripted cron job run at 01:00 daily)
> > failed due to apt-listbugs complaining about the boot-breaking bug in
> > shim-signed, and pinning v
On Tue 22 Jun 2021 at 08:59:13 (+0100), Gareth Evans wrote:
> A recent dist-upgrade on Buster (in a scripted cron job run at 01:00 daily)
> failed due to apt-listbugs complaining about the boot-breaking bug in
> shim-signed, and pinning v1.33 in the process.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
9 matches
Mail list logo
