Sven Joachim wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > So then to preserve the upstart configuration would you recommend
> > marking it as 'hold' so that apt-get won't consider the action in the
> > future? I think this is needed.
> >
> > apt-mark hold upstart
> >
> > I tested that in a VM and it seemed to
On 2013-11-07 18:33 +0100, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Here the difference is that "apt-get dist-upgrade" insists on pulling in
>> any removed essential packages, while "aptitude full-upgrade" leaves
>> those alone. Both approaches have their disadvantages, although I
>> consid
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Florian Lindner wrote:
> >> root@xxx:~# aptitude full-upgrade
> >> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> >> but apt-get
> >> root@xxx:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
> >> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> >> upstart
> >> The following N
On 2013-11-07 17:38 +0100, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Florian Lindner wrote:
>> root@xxx:~# aptitude full-upgrade
>> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
>> but apt-get
>> root@xxx:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
>> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>> upstart
>> The following NEW package
Florian Lindner wrote:
> I have a virtual server with a minimal debian wheezy image provided by the
> hoster.
Wheezy. Gotcha.
> Right after setup of the image:
>
> root@xxx:~# aptitude full-upgrade
> ...
> root@xxx:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
> ...
You don't show it. Did you update first? Pleas
Hello,
I have a virtual server with a minimal debian wheezy image provided by the
hoster.
Right after setup of the image:
root@xxx:~# aptitude full-upgrade
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0
6 matches
Mail list logo
