On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:11:08PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 20:11:08 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Desktop Performance Issue
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
> From: Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 05:34:3
hi ya bruce
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Bruce Sass wrote:
> bms:~# hdparm -iv /dev/hda
>
> /dev/hda:
> multcount= 0 (off)
good and bad
> IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit)
good and bad
> unmaskirq= 0 (off)
turn it on ( -u1 )
> using_dma= 0 (off)
definitely turn it on ( -d 1
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How did you determine the appropriate values for all of the
> other settings you made besides the DMA setting? (Or, where
> did you come across this information for these settings
> (besides the man page obviously))?
lots o digging/reading or see b
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 15:25, Bruce Sass wrote:
> [snip]
> > I think it is the chips which don't do DMA.
> > circa 1990 hardware
>
> Wow, that's what? A 486/20 w/ all ISA slots and a 100MB HDD???
486DX2-25, 64M RAM, all ISA(PNP), 850M + 30G HDD
running KDE
Hello Alvin,
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > >>/dev/hda:
> > > >> setting using_dma to 1 (on)
> > > >> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
> > > >> using_dma= 0 (off)
> > > >
> > > > Do it as root
> >
> > of course
> >
> > > sometimes .. you have to make s
I found an article at O'Reilly network that covers hdparm. After reading
it and using their suggestions I came accross this combo. When I have
time I might tweak around and see if I can dial it in more but for now
this works for me. The article is at
http://linux.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/272
Michael
How did you determine the appropriate values for all of the
other settings you made besides the DMA setting? (Or, where
did you come across this information for these settings
(besides the man page obviously))?
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:17:31PM -0700, Michael wrote:
> You guys hooked me up. I en
How did you determine the appropriate values for all of the
other settings you made besides the DMA setting? (Or, where
did you come across this information for these settings
(besides the man page obviously))?
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:17:31PM -0700, Michael wrote:
> You guys hooked me up. I en
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 05:34:38PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>># hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda
>>
>>/dev/hda:
>> setting using_dma to 1 (on)
>> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
>> using_dma= 0 (off)
>
> Do it as root
Yes, that's what the # means
--
.
On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 15:25, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > >>From: "Bruce Sass"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
> I think it is the chips which don't do DMA.
> circa 1990 hardware
Wow, that's what? A 486/20 w/ all ISA
hi ya bruce
> > >>/dev/hda:
> > >> setting using_dma to 1 (on)
> > >> HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
> > >> using_dma= 0 (off)
> > >
> > > Do it as root
>
> of course
>
> > sometimes .. you have to make sure that the chips and
> > the drive supports DMA ...
>
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Alvin Oga wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >>From: "Bruce Sass"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ...
> >>> /sbin/hdparm -d 1 /dev/hd[abc]
> >>>
> >>> Works like a treat!
> >>
> >># hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda
> >>
> >>/dev/hda:
> >> set
hi ya
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>From: "Bruce Sass"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
>>> /sbin/hdparm -d 1 /dev/hd[abc]
>>>
>>> Works like a treat!
>>
>># hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda
>>
>>/dev/hda:
>> setting using_dma to 1 (on)
>> HDIO_SET_DMA failed:
-Original Message-
>From: "Bruce Sass"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: 27/12/02 23:15:06
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: "xio"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Desktop Performance Issue
&
You guys hooked me up. I entered the following hdparm command:
hdparm -X34 -d1 -u1 -m16 -c3 /dev/hda
Not only are problems resolved but system in general runs much quicker
and is more responsive. Hdparm is now running at startup!! Thanks all for
you help with this one. Wish I'd of asked a long ti
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, xio wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Probably not needed. Try running hdparm to enable DMA.
>
> I agree. First thing after a Debian install I always put the following
> line into /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh:
>
> /sbin/hdparm -d 1 /dev/hd[abc]
>
> Works like a treat!
# hdparm -
Frank Gevaerts wrote:
Probably not needed. Try running hdparm to enable DMA.
I agree. First thing after a Debian install I always put the following
line into /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh:
/sbin/hdparm -d 1 /dev/hd[abc]
Works like a treat!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 12:57:05PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> He said he's using xmms, which has always done much better here than
> mpg123. I'd have to guess offhand, without knowing more of his
> circumstances, that the problem is likely to be DMA related. Many of
> Debian's stock kernels
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:57:05 -0500, "Stephen Gran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> This one time, at band camp, Mark L. Kahnt said:
> > On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 11:55, Jeff wrote:
> > > Michael Evaniuck, 2002-Dec-27 09:40 -0700:
> > > > If I run am running Debian and attempt to run multiple applications a
This one time, at band camp, Mark L. Kahnt said:
> On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 11:55, Jeff wrote:
> > Michael Evaniuck, 2002-Dec-27 09:40 -0700:
> > > If I run am running Debian and attempt to run multiple applications at
> > > the same time performance degrades a lot. For example if I am playing an
> >
On Fri, 2002-12-27 at 11:55, Jeff wrote:
> Michael Evaniuck, 2002-Dec-27 09:40 -0700:
> > I have been running Debian intermitantly since 2.2 was out. There is
> > nothing I would like more to standardize on this distro but there is one
> > issue I can not seem to get over. Hopefully one of you good
Michael Evaniuck, 2002-Dec-27 09:40 -0700:
> I have been running Debian intermitantly since 2.2 was out. There is
> nothing I would like more to standardize on this distro but there is one
> issue I can not seem to get over. Hopefully one of you good people can
> assist me on this.
>
> If I run am
I have been running Debian intermitantly since 2.2 was out. There is
nothing I would like more to standardize on this distro but there is one
issue I can not seem to get over. Hopefully one of you good people can
assist me on this.
If I run am running Debian and attempt to run multiple application
23 matches
Mail list logo
