[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Currently it's still microsoft, mainly because of games,
Non-issue. http://www.transgaming.com/ I'm a *serious* Vice City
junkie, and I don't have any consoles and I don't do Windows.
> but I am sure this will change sometime in the future when Linux
> gets a little
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My reccomendation is to download the kernel-source-* package
>> that corresponds to the kernel you run now. Use the configuration
>> for your currently running kernel (since you know it works).
>> After going through the process a few times, you will b
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:39:30PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>It's perfectly possible to
> >>install 2.6 even on the current stable, albeit with a few backports
> >
> >of
> >
> >>things like module-init-tools and e2fsprogs
> >
> >
> >I am too much of a newbie to at
On Sunday 21 March 2004 02:39, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>It's perfectly possible to
> >>install 2.6 even on the current stable, albeit with a few backports
> >
> > of
> >
> >>things like module-init-tools and e2fsprogs
> >
> > I am too much of a newbie to attempt such a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 11:46:08PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Better than any other OS on the market. You might have to work for
>> parts of it, but jeeze, what other distribution of anything supports
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's perfectly possible to
install 2.6 even on the current stable, albeit with a few backports
of
things like module-init-tools and e2fsprogs
I am too much of a newbie to attempt such a thing. I was raised on
BASIC, on the Timex-Sinclair, C64, TI-994A, then moved to Uni
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 01:21:13AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. More insight is very welcome, so keep them
> coming.
>
> So far what I think I am going to do is wait for SuSE 9.1 and the new
> release of Debian (which I presume will both use the 2.6 Kernel) and
> re-c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 1. In the newest version, how good is the hardware support?
Better than any other OS on the market. You might have to work for
parts of it, but jeeze, what other distribution of anything supports
13 architectures? How m
On 2004-03-19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned:
[snip]
> But what about LCD support (how easily can I adjust refresh rate etc.?
> I am not afraid to do it by hand, as long as it will let me).
I googled on my LCD monitor's model and found that someone had posted
some helpful modelines. I used those s
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 05:02:06PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >It seems with SuSE and redhat (which I played with for a week or two),
> >my major issues are ALWAYS hardware. Which I doubt is earth
> >shattering.
> >
> >2. Boot loader --> I am pretty sure I read on their
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No good reason why, but I am considering switching from SuSE 8.2 to
Debian.
Knowledge and skill-wise, I probably am still in the "newbie"
category, but I can do a heck of a lot more than I could at first.
Some questions for those of you who use Debian:
1. In the newest v
No good reason why, but I am considering switching from SuSE 8.2 to
Debian.
Knowledge and skill-wise, I probably am still in the "newbie"
category, but I can do a heck of a lot more than I could at first.
Some questions for those of you who use Debian:
1. In the newest version, how good is the
12 matches
Mail list logo
